Zhu Ying
Recently, China and the United States have been on Tan Desai and the World Health Organization (WHO).On April 7, Trump critically criticized WHO three times a day with China as the center and provided errors on the issue of coronary virus epidemic.He tweeted earlier: WHO really messed up.
On April 8th, the People's Daily responded quickly and pointed out that some people had slandered and slandered the WHO's organizations. This kind of demolition of human life and safety was no less harmful than the epidemic itself.On the same day, Zhao Lijian, a spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said that China will continue to support WHO's work as always, and support WHO to continue to play a leading role in global anti -epidemic cooperation.
First of all, is WHO's response to the crown disease epidemic?On March 3rd, the French think tank in the French think tank (Institut Montaigne) issued the first evaluation report on the crisis of the WHO's crown disease.The report pointed out that the Director -General of the WHO Tan Desai in this crisis with obvious tendency to blindly trust the information provided by China, which is one of the reasons why other countries responded to the timely crisis.The report sorted out the timetable for the outbreak of the crown disease, and the unsuitable response made by the WHO at various stages.
There are at least four time points that WHO is most questioned: First, why do you ignore the epidemic warning from Taiwan on December 31, 2019?On the same day, Taiwan sent an electronic mail to the WHO to warn the virus capable people.At present, the WHO has denied that it is claimed that the email issued by Taiwan is not mentioned.
On April 11, Minister of Health and Welfare, Chen Shizhong, explained that if Taiwan was explicitly explicit, it was called misleading information.The letter clearly states that local media and health authorities have said that there are seven cases of isolation treatment. WHO is the Organizer who speaks the layman. Isolate the treatment is not a warning message. What is the situation is a warning message.On January 14th, the WHO issued a post: The preliminary investigation of the Chinese authorities was found to have clear evidence.
Second, do people pass on January 21 delay the release?On January 20th, after the Chinese official regulating virus can be passed on, the WHO changed its mouth on January 21 that it might continue to be passed on.Third, on January 30, the global public health emergency was delayed; from January 22 to 23, WHO held an emergency meeting to discuss whether the epidemic was listed as an international concern for public health.It was not until the 30th of the WHO that the WHO acknowledged the outbreak and announced the global public health emergency.However, Tan Desai insisted that he did not recommend restricting trade and personnel.
Fourth, on February 3rd, Tan Detai called for not to restrict tourism in China.At the meeting of the Executive Committee of the World Health Organization on February 3, when representatives of various countries were concerned about the epidemic, China criticized countries' trade and tourism restrictions on China's trade and tourism.The National Health Organization ’s press release on February 3 was the title of unnecessary intervention measures on international travel and trade.In the press release, Tan Dezai said that the epidemic was controlled.
These four time points are summarized as one point: Is the WHO's response to the epidemic because of China?On March 26th, the Japanese Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Makotaro said that many people shouted that the WHO was renamed the China Health Organization, which was called CHO from WHO.
Zhang Wenhong, director of the Department of Infectious Department of Shanghai Huashan Hospital, pointed out at the April 8th to participate in the Anti -Coronal Virus Epidemic Virus Video Forum hosted by the Asian Association on April 8 that according to the original mathematical model prediction, Shanghai with a population of 30 million people can reach up to 80 in a certain diagnosis case.Ten thousand.In fact, there are only 400 diagnosis patients in Shanghai, and the outbreak is controlled within two weeks.We believe that the key to fighting coronal virus is time, diagnosis and treatment early, isolation and early, and at the same time, tracking is thorough.
That is to say, is the WHO's lagging reaction, and is it obvious that the preparation time for countries to miss the resistance of the resistance of various countries?It is recognized in the world.At the end of March, the team of Academician Zhong Nanshan in China issued research results that the epidemic in mainland China reached its peak on February 28. If measures are taken five days as early as possible, the number of infections will be more than two -thirds less than it is now.
Is it possible to take measures in five days as a measure on January 23?If five or 10 days ago, what will happen?If China takes measures earlier, WHO also announces the earliest public health emergencies in China earlier. Is the crown disease in the world a big difference today?
Secondly, will China and the United States be paralyzed by the WST?On April 8th, Tan Desai returned to Trump and said: Please do not politically.Regarding Tan Desai's response, Trump counterattacked that WHO was centered on China, saying that everything was good, no one preached, and kept the border open.On April 9th, Tan Dezai posted in Twitter that in the past 100 days, our unwavering commitment was to serve people around the world fairly, objectively, and neutral.
Trump's accusation of WHO has a social foundation in the United States and in the words of several Republican eagles in the United States, the anger of the people is burning.On April 6th, Rick Scott, a member of the US Senate Land and Security Committee, said that Congress must investigate the prevalence of WHO in response to crown diseases.What is the money of American taxpayers?
According to data from the Caesar Family Foundation, the US taxpayer donated $ 513 million to WHO in 2017, with $ 341 million in 2019.Todd Young, chairman of the US Senate's Foreign Relations Multilateral Institutional Group Committee, went to Tan Dezai and asked him to attend the hearing to explain the external doubts.On April 7th, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the British House of Commons issued a report to directly criticize the WHO to deal with improper treatment of the epidemic. It is recommended to establish the G20 for Public Health.
On April 8th, French President Macron called Tan Dezai and expressed his support for the WHO. France refused to see the WHO's political wrestling between China and the United States.UN Secretary -General Gutres also defended the WHO.Tan Desai is from African countries and is supported by African countries.Moussa Faki Mahamat, chairman of the African Union Committee, said on Twitter that the African Union fully supports World Guard and Tan Dezai.
On April 14th, Trump announced that he would review the serious improper management and concealment of the World Health Organization in the response to the crown disease. During the review, he suspended the provision of funds to the WHO.On the same day, Republican Senator Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) and six other Republican members jointly wrote a letter to Tan Dezai to ask the WHO for information about the crown disease.
At present, a Canadian netizens have launched a request for the world's largest network petition platform to resign. As of April 13, more than 910,000 people have been supported.The United States is responsible for how Tan Desai's result is that how China defended Tan Desai has become a focus of the global crown disease.
The author is a professor of economics at Shanghai Normal University Business School
At present, a Canadian netizens have launched a request for the world's largest network petition platform to resign. As of April 13, more than 910,000 people have been supported.The United States is responsible for how Tan Desai's result is that how China defended Tan Desai has become a focus of the global crown disease.
