Turning in the Time Language
Once upon a time, the party's struggle to stop on the coast of the Ocean was the slogan of the United States' foreign policy to maintain the two parties.The hustle and bustle of the US House of Representatives impeached the presidential hearing not only ended the tradition, but also showed that diplomacy has become an important battlefield for the struggle between the two parties.
Trump claims that his diplomatic route is the United States priority, and Tongwumen shows that this is Trump's personal political interests first.Generally speaking, the United States of Trump, who is born in a businessman, is mainly based on economic accounts. In addition to the Sino -US trade war, the biggest complaint of the Trump administration is that the free world allies always take advantage of the United States.Protection, while making a lot of exports to the United States to earn Americans' money.
From the perspective of political philosophy, Trump's economic account did represent his populist grassroots.It is difficult for the U.S. low -education white groups to understand the great benefits brought by the United States (Pax Americana) under the United States after the Second World War. Especially Washington as the world police, the geopolitics brought about by the unique control of the international situation.Interests and unparalleled soft power influences around the world.Trump is a foreign country's concern, which has caused the elites to worry about Washington's international influence on Washington's loss of international influence.
Trump can only be regarded as the foreign policy of economic accounts, which may accelerate the evolution of geopolitics in Northeast Asia.This is Washington recently demanded that Japan and South Korea have increased their financial expenditures for the two countries' garrison.Regarding the actual occupation of Japan after World War II, how many rooms to pay off in Tokyo regardless of the time, Washington's asking price for Seoul has attracted a lot of rebounds.
First, the US Defense Minister Esper publicly stated that South Korea was a wealthy country and may and should pay more funds to help offset defense costs.According to the latest Economist Weekly, the US negotiating represents the lion's opening, requiring the annual fee that South Korea to bear the US garrison, from the current 890 million US dollars to $ 5 billion, an increase of more than four times.This is not yet the cost of South Korea, which has been increasing in Washington's demand in recent years.Such a sky -high price could not be accepted by the South Korea's opposition, resulting in the breakdown of the negotiations.
The Trump administration's next actions, such as the South Korean Korean Daily quoted Washington diplomatic, said that if the negotiations have not progressed, the U.S. military will prepare to remove a brigade from the peninsula.Ironically, according to the US CNN report, the US Senate's hearing has confirmed that because of the annual expenditure in South Korea, the US military is half cheaper than that of South Korea than in the United States.
In other words, the withdrawal of the US military in South Korea will only increase the US military expenditure.More importantly, such as many elites in the United States worrying, such an economic account will bring serious political consequences.
Sure enough, the Washington Post immediately pointed out that while the negotiations between the South Korean and US military expenses broke down, Seoul signed a cooperation agreement with Beijing. In addition to establishing a military hotline, it would also strengthen other military exchanges.The Washington Post describes this development as the most dramatic evidence of Trump's foreign policy in East Asia.Economists also believe that this Korean -Chinese agreement has great symbolic significance.
The New York Times reported that while the military expenditure was going to be Shoul, the Trump administration also pressured South Korea to restore Japan and South Korea's intelligence cooperation plan and was rejected by the South Korean government that unless Japan canceled the trade embargo against South Korea, South Korea would terminate Washington 2016 in 2016Director's Japan -South Korean intelligence cooperation agreement.Japan's trade embargo on South Korea is to retaliate against the Supreme Court of South Korea to determine that Japanese companies must make financial compensation on the crimes of colonially forced South Korean workers in the colonial era.Such a report that Washington is unrealistic to restrict China's approach to restrict China with the South Korean and Japanese axis.
In my opinion, under the climate of troubles around Xinjiang to Hong Kong and other places, this symbolic development of South Korea -China relations is indeed an important diplomatic achievement of the Chinese government.The next question is, will Beijing make a substantial security promise to South Korea?Such security promises will significantly change the geopolitical layout of Northeast Asia, and have a significant relationship with China's long -term interests.
The future unification of the Korean Peninsula is led by South Korea, which is an irreversible trend.Beijing's heart disease is worried whether the Korean people in the country will cause South Korea's territorial demands.Especially after the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea, many middle and upper -level Korean cadres resigned from South Korea.However, according to various reports, most of the new generations of Chinese Korean people have been completely Chinese, and they no longer speak Korean.This is actually the natural result of the highest education of the Korean ethnic groups in Chinese ethnic groups. It also reminds Beijing that it is half the effort to implement national identity like Xinjiang and Hong Kong with high pressure.
The author is engaged in scientific research in North America
