Ji Yan Chunqiu
Following Cao Xuetao, president of Nankai University and academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, was accused of fraud, a letter from the former dean of the School of Life Sciences and the president of the Capital Medical University reported that a letter of the fraud from three academic big coffee papers was recently disclosed by the media, which caused itPublic opinion was uproar.An academic counterfeit storm seems to be inevitable.
The three academic authorities reported by Rao Yi are Li Hongliang, Dean of Wuhan University Basic Medical College, doctoral tutor, academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Pei Gang, doctoral tutor of the Institute of Biochemical Cell of the Shanghai Institute of Life Sciences, and the Academic Institute of Shanghai Institute of Pharmaceutical Research from the Chinese Academy of Sciences.Geng Meiyu.Among them, Geng Meiyu is the first main researcher in China to treat Alzheimer's GV971. This drug is considered to fill the world gap.
Rao Yi suggested in the letter of Li Jinghai, director of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (hereinafter referred to as the Fund Commission) to the National Natural Science Foundation of China that the Fund Commission should investigate Li Hongliang for 17 years.Published papers, Figure 3. Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5 of this paper cannot be real. Only fraud can be generated; Geng Meiyu's article as a communication author claims that the drug GV971 that it invented can treat mice through intestinal flora to treat mice.Alzheimer's disease, this article is impossible without fraud.
It is worth noting that in the letter, Rao Yi also accused the Fund Commission of recently requested a letter of investigation by the Capital Medical University to investigate Rao Yi's papers many years ago.Old articles, well -known counterfeiters Fang Zhouzi and others have made it clear that Rao Yi's laboratory has nothing to do. The fund issuing a letter requesting to investigate the matter is not only inappropriate, but it also shows that some people have no conscience.
Rao Yi asked the Fund Commission to change the evil and do what he should do, not the accomplice of the Chinese academic incompetence. Please ask your committee to do some good things and wash shame for the Chinese scientific community.
Rao Yi, 57, is a well -known returnee scholar. He graduated from Shanghai Medical College in his early years. He has been a doctor of neuroscience philosophy at the University of California, San Francisco.The university anatomy and the Department of neurological biology teach and lead the independent laboratory. Since 2004, he has served as professor of neuroshiners at the School of Medicine of Northwestern University and Deputy Director of the Institute of neuroscience in Northwestern University.In 2007, Rao Yi returned to the country to develop. He successively served as the dean of the School of Life Sciences of Peking University and the director of the Peking University Division. He served as the president of the Capital Medical University in June this year.
Rao Yi is known for his dare to speak in the Chinese academic community. He once pointed out that a good study in China is not as important as the relationship with officials and experts they appreciated, and offended some officialdom and academic people.In 2011, Rao Yi, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, announced that he would no longer participate in the academician candidates, which caused the outside world to pay attention to the disadvantages of the Chinese academic community.
Today, Rao Yi bombarded the China National Natural Science Foundation of China, which was in charge of scientific research, and reported the real names of the three academic people's dissertations for fraud. In addition, Cao Xuetao, who was the president of Nankai University, was also disclosed by foreign scholars to disclose the dissertation for fraud.The wind of fraud in the Chinese academic community again appeared in the public view.
But exposing fraud does not necessarily cause actual counterfeiting.Although Chinese officials have successively introduced a series of opinions and rules for strengthening scientific research integrity in recent years, scholars who have been punished by academic fraud, especially big coffee scholars, are still very rare.
On the contrary, people who are actively engaged in academic leave often have difficulties and are even stink.The most famous academic counterfeiter in China is Fang Zhouzi. He has set off a fake case that has attracted widespread attention from public opinion, and was attacked by Xiao Chuanguo.Known as a fake fighter.
However, Fang Zhouzi himself has also been accused of being suspected of academic inconsistency or even cheating money. Some of his extreme remarks and support for genetically modified food have made him attacked.Tragedy.
Regarding Rao Yi's report, the National Natural Science Foundation of China has stated that it is currently investigating and verifying the matter.Geng Meiyu's Shanghai Institute of Medicine, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, responded that Geng Meiyu's relevant papers do not have academic fraud. The Drug Institute will actively cooperate with third -party authoritative departments to check and continue to do related research work such as GV971.
There is no doubt that Rao Yi's report triggered an earthquake in the Chinese academic community.However, academic counterfeiting requires not only sufficient professional evidence, but also to break through certain relationships and interest chains.How far can Chinese academic fakes go, it is still difficult to evaluate.
