The market -oriented newspapers under the People's Daily of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China issued social reviews on the 25th to analyze the Chinese policy speech delivered by the US Vice President Pence, saying that Pence's speech and qualitatively bounced on China.Very similar.However, there are some new ideas, that is, Pence has expressed a relatively positive attitude towards improving US -China relations, emphasizing that the United States is not going to decompose with China.
Social reviews proposed that these new statements made Pence's speech on Thursday that was different from last year's speech.Li Haidong, a scholar in China, interpreted that last year's Peters speech was suspected of being a declaration of the New Cold War, but his new speech was milder, and he seemed to be expressed in contact with China.
Social comment believes that the United States has expressed diversity and variability in the past, so it is necessary to continue to observe how the United States will go on the issue of China.
The following is the original comment of the Global Times:
Social Comment: The old tone of the words of Pence's speech and a little change
Vice President Pence delivered a new Chinese policy speech on Thursday, US time.Our initial impression was: his description and qualitative old bomb of China, similar to last year's speech.However, he expressed a relatively positive attitude towards improving US -China relations, emphasizing that the United States would not be decoupled with China, and hoped that relations between the two countries had a better future.
This speech repeatedly repeated the Chinese attack on China. For example, once again, it was deducted from China to theft of American intellectual property rights, militaryization of the South China Sea, religious oppression, pressure on American companies and film and television industries, hats that destroyed the freedom of speech in the United States, etc.EssenceIn addition, it slandered to discredit China on issues of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Xinjiang and interfered in China's internal affairs.
The main line of the speech is to sing a praise for the current policy of the United States, emphasizing how wise and great the tough policy for China.This is also the focus of last year's speech.Last year, the United States faced a mid -term election. On October 4, Pence delivered a clear intention to speak for the Republican tickets for the Republican Party. This time, his speech naturally served the presidential election next year.
The new intention of Pence's speech on Thursday was that the latter part of the speech released a positive attitude to reaching a trade agreement with China and improving relations.He said that the United States did not want to decompose with China, emphasizing the personal friendship between the leaders of the United States and China, and expressed his hope that the US -China relations will bring more well -being to the people of the two countries and reach a better relationship and future.
Pence said that the United States will not allow various challenges to block the development of US -China relations. He emphasized that President Trump has a positive attitude towards the United States and China to reach a trade agreement and will continue to make economic and cultural exchanges with China.He also said that the two countries will continue to cooperate on the Korean Peninsula without nuclearization and the Middle East issue, and believe that this correct relationship is critical to the two countries.
These new statements make Pence's speech on Thursday different from last year's speech.This is probably the common impression of most people.Li Haidong, a scholar in China, interpreted the first time that Pence's speech last year was suspected of being a declaration of the New Cold War, but his new speech was gentle, and it seemed to have the meaning of expressed contact with China.
However, we must see that Pence's personal attitude towards China has a deep brand of Cold War. This speech also fully reflects his serious prejudice against China.He denied that China established a political system in accordance with its national conditions. Although it said that the United States did not want to decide with China, it was at the same time that China was isolating from the world.He used very fierce language on attacks on Chinese human rights, economic policies, national defense, etc., so that people were confused about whether he expressed his willingness to improve the relationship with China.
The United States' statement to China has shown diversity and variability in the past, not only serving their long -term strategy to China, but also in short -term operations.Therefore, Washington will continue to observe how to go on the issue of China.
We believe that Sino -US relations and the continuous upgrading of the trade war have caused damage to both the interests of the two countries. China is not that the United States can overwhelm the tough policy. This reality has been fully proven in the past year and a half.Political elites in the United States need to face up to the limitations of suppression of China, and make improving Sino -US relations in the direction of truly ease.Burns said that he hoped that China would not only implement the improvement of Sino -US relations, but we think this should be given to Washington itself.
Yes, China's political system is different from the United States, and the transformation of China in politics is destined to be unreasonable.However, China and the United States have sufficient conditions for peaceful coexistence, win -win cooperation, and extensive practical possibilities.Different civilizations should be able to get along in the 21st century. Our world should be rich and diverse. This principle is the most universal, and it is also a real friend of time.
We hope that the United States will not refuse to make a truly meaningful great attempt with China and countries around the world to contribute to the United States' power and wisdom to create peace in the 21st century.
