Current affairs perspective
After the talks between the heads of China and the United States in Osaka at the end of June, according to the news released by the two parties, the negotiations were restarted this time. The China did not seem to make a concession. Instead, Trump promised to suspend new tariffs and agree that the negotiation would be equal and mutually beneficial.The author believes that this is a concession in the United States.
However, there are also different opinions that Trump's concessions are greater than substantial; some say that Trump's concessions can regret it at any time, not counting, and there is a point that it is the Chinese side that really gives.
The reason is that before the recent round of negotiations, the United States has raised tariffs on US $ 200 billion in US -US transmission products to 25%. It has not been revoked during this talk.Is it equivalent to the concession of China?
My opinion on this is exactly the opposite.First of all, the United States' increase in taxes is not just the Chinese side's loss, but in fact the United States itself is damaged.
Why do you say that?Because the other party is required to cancel a large amount of tax increases, there is generally there must be exchanges.And this is exactly the mdash; MDASH; he beats you with a tariff stick, isn't he just wanting you to shout pain and talk about conditions?
China does not mention the 200 billion US dollars to increase taxes, which means that there is no intention to concession.If you don't care about this, the focus of the re -talk is not here. If you don't cancel the tax increase, you look at the attitude of doing your own.Cancel, no face, no cancellation, this tax is uncomfortable.In fact, the United States has begun to rebound.
More importantly, I originally thought that a trump card had been played, but after being hit, the other party did not move, but it was difficult to ride a tiger.There is also the more terrifying $ 325 billion, saying that it is to fight but dare not fight.Of course, the main reason for not adding is internal pressure.But in this way, Trump is the most proud and the biggest negotiation chip in the United States. Isn't it abolished?
If there are no such tariffs on their hands, where will the balance between China and the United States be tilted with the balance between China and the United States?So don't believe it, the negotiations returned to the right track, or that Trump promised that the negotiations would be equal and reciprocal, and it may not be deceiving.Because he really has no stick to fight.
What really can't do, I'm afraid it is the sentence that Trump said when he was full of confidence: the trade agreement between China and the United States should not be equal.
Of course, there are still many people who insist that Trump has not made a substantial concession.However, the news later was that there were US members of the United States not thinking so.They even criticized the president's concession.
For the two things proposed by China on the grounds of fairness, treat Chinese students fairly, and treat Chinese companies (almost specially referred to Huawei) fairly, Trump also seems to have made some concessions at the Xi special meeting.
At a press conference after the talks, Trump said he would agree to sell products and services to Huawei.He said that the high -tech products produced by American companies are unique in the world, and American companies should not be responsible for what Huawei does.And he will continue to ban the United States from using Huawei products.
Although Trump did not remove Huawei from the entity list, he was obviously looking for a speech for the relaxation of Huawei's ban.This naturally aroused the rebound of parliamentarians who originally supported him.
Among them, the strongest criticism for Trump is Senator Rubio.He pushed a special point that if Trump made a concession on the issue of sanctions against Huawei, it would be a disaster mistake.
He also vowed that if the president changed his position for Huawei, the senators would pass a new prohibition bill.He expects the two hospitals to overthrow the president's veto with sufficient majority tickets.This means that parliamentarians will force the president to perform a ban.
Whether Ruby can represent the majority of Congress, the author does not discuss it here.However, many members of the United States have determined that Trump has made concessions and is catastrophic.This must be a fact.
So who did the first talks between the Sino -US dollar?It should be said that it is relatively clear.
However, I don't think that relaxing the ban on Huawei will be disastrous.Because even if it is not relaxed, Huawei will not fall, and the United States will not have 5G technology because of this.Relaxing, Huawei's life will be better, but what?Will it really bring disaster to the so -called national security in the United States?
Rubio's anger, in my opinion, made the wrong place.What he should worry about is that once Trump has no tariff stick (or the stick is finished), how should the next trade negotiation be talked about?
Don't forget that the 10%of the remaining 10%is the key to the victory.Otherwise, the negotiations will not fall into a deadlock.This is definitely more important than the national security that members talk about.
Author is engaged in the information technology industry
