Han Yonghong: The two TV female anchors Wen and the elegant China and the United State

Early North to read

Trish Regan, a star host of the Fox Fox Business Channel, who has received much attention, argued by Liu Xin, the host of China Global Television Network (CGTN), and the Chinese official media.

At this time when the Sino -US trade war and the Cold War of Science and Technology were constantly upgraded, the beauty of this beauty host attracted a lot of attention, but many people lost their expectations.17 minutes of cross -ocean interviews.

In terms of the quality of the debate, the content of the two presented was flat. Reagan's question really could not talk about a powerful challenge. Instead, it seemed to provide Liu Xin with a platform to explain China's position to the American audience.I do n’t know if both women instinctively avoid showing sturdy in front of the camera, or because Liu Xin sets up the prerequisite that must not be scolded., Basically, there are no additional questions.

Of course, there are still faint confrontation. The most exciting thing is that the invisible tricks are invisible.When Introduction, Reagan said that her remarks only represent herself, and the introduction of Liu Xin was part of the Communist Party of China. She stated that through Liu Xin's speech, everyone can know how the CCP thinks about trade issues and how to think about the United States.

Later, Liu Xin, who appeared on the scene, did not fall into the trap. She immediately corrected the police officer, and she said solemnly regardless of Ligan's speech.The Chinese Communist Party spoke, I just represent myself, a news person working in CGTN.

This round of preparation has ended within a few seconds, but it has become the most substantial confrontation of this debate, and it has laid Liu Xin’s aura mdash; mdash;Part of CCTV, but just an ordinary media person, suddenly flattened the status of the two.

For audiences who know the situation in China, the next debate will be relatively lacking.Reagan has set up several fields, including trade negotiations, China's theft of American intellectual property rights, China's developing countries, and China's economic model. Nothing is Liu Xin unable to fight.

Many people have noticed that Liu Xin admits that China has the existence of intellectual property infringement, piracy, and even stealing commercial secrets, but she explains that China has consensus to protect intellectual property rights. The United States also has such judicial lawsuits.Theft, or Chinese theft, or the Chinese are theft.

As for the question of what national capitalism and the Chinese economic system, Liu Xin delayed it for a while before receiving the recruitment.Her answer was socialism with Chinese characteristics. In the end, the two ended their talks in the unanimous consensus and harmonious atmosphere that the economy should be more open.

Inventory afterwards, both of them did not persuade each other in terms of the fuse of this debate that stole American intellectual property rights.But if the winning or losing, neither of them defeated each other, but both of them won.

For Liu Xin and her side, they can state their own opinions in the conservative American news Taichung, especially letting ordinary Americans see Chinese official media reporters confident, sincere, reasonable, and able to speak.Merchants are not promoting machines with green noodles and no independent thinking ability. This is a big harvest.Liu Xin brought the propaganda effect this time, no less than that of the Chinese propaganda department invested huge sums of money on the US media.

Similarly, from the perspective of Reagan, although the interviewer can have the sharpness and the show seems plain, but let go of the aggressive posture, show the demeanor of different sounds, and add points to the professional image of the American media.

Perhaps, Liu Xin and Reagan both knew that the opponents who had confronted each other this time were not the other party, but the thousands of domestic audiences in China.And attitude.In short, both of them are fighting for the battle of people.The win -win losses of the two will not bring any differences to the Sino -US trade negotiations at all, but they can improve their image. Both of them do their best.

In any case, the Chinese government will definitely publicize Liu Xin to win an analysis of unsatisfactory wins.

First of all, everyone should have not raised this debate to the national level; secondly, in May, the U.S. trade negotiations in junior high school in May completely ruptured, and the United States began to impose tariffs. As the strangling of Huawei is increasingly compact, the Chinese eliteThe layer has seen the grim of the huge pressure and problems. It is no longer a trade war between China and the United States, but the battle for science and technology and the future.

For China, in the face of the risk of being trapped in the fierce international wrestling, it is not to manipulate nationalism or adopt spiritual victory. The Chinese -American debate with no smell of gunpowder is a specific need for reality.The highly anxious all walks of life a little relieved.