/> The Fox Business Channel broadcast the anchor Cuixi Middot; Reagan (left) and the anchor of China International TV, Liu Xin, were paying great attention from the outside world.(Photo by Lin Zerui)

The Chinese -American anchor's Circular Debate yesterday and the Qi Harvesting Field. The interviewed experts believed that Liu Xin accurately promoted China's official position, and Cuixi Middot; Reagan showed a mild gesture and harvested the reputation.Some look for the same spirit of common deposits.

Wang Jiangyu, an associate professor at the National University of Singapore's National University of Law, was commented during an interview with Lianhe Morning Post that the two had previously confronted each other on their respective programs and social media, which seemed aggressive; but yesterday's conversation was carried out in a relatively polite and fair atmosphere.

Wang Jiangyu believes that Liu Xin made a concise and accurate explanation of China's official position, with a mild attitude and reasonable expression, and strong expression ability. This is the most needed image in the international community in China.Reagan followed the principles of occupational principles, and did not bully or set up a trap for Liu Xin, and also harvested his reputation through this debate.

He believes that this reflects the two different cultures and models in a peaceful and friendly dialogue as possible, so as to seek common ground while deposit differences, and provide a good example for the Sino -US trade -in trade war.

Cheng Xiaohe, an associate professor of the Department of International Political Science of Renmin University of China, said in an interview that the debate of lip guns and swords is likely to solidify or incite nationalist emotions. Discussions about who to win afterwards may also exacerbate the hostility between China and the United States.

Expressions are more like interviews

Therefore, he believes that Liu Xin and Reagan's performance yesterday reduced the negative effects of the relative to Sino -US relations.He believes that the debate is more like an interview, and an interview is difficult to divide the winners and losers.

After the show yesterday, Liu Xin accepted the news interview from China Central Television to further show her friendly gesture to Reagan.When asked, if Reagan came to China, he wanted to take her most. Liu Xin said: I want to take her to a country in China.

She also said: I think (Reagan) and I may be friends at all, and I think this is the best result.

Aesthetic scholars want Reagan to debate again

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said at a regular press conference yesterday and said in the evaluation of the debate: This should not be a debate, or a conversation between the two hosts.He said that in the current situation of Sino -US relations, he is happy to see people from all walks of life in China and the United States in context, honesty, and rational dialogue.

However, Liu Xin and Reagan's politeness also has no shortage of doubts.After Reagan's dialogue with Liu Xin yesterday, Reagan invited Michael Pillsbury to commented on the spot.Bai Bangrui said that Liu Xin performed elegant and kindly, and was also prepared to explain his key arguments.

However, he said that this is one of the issues that US President Trump and the US trade negotiation team faced in the past year: China has performed well, but he denies almost all accusations;The 150 -page long agreement, but the Chinese side later retreated, so that the negotiations are now deadlocked.

Bai Bangrui believes that it is necessary to continue to apply greater pressure and recommend that Reagan conducts a second round of debate to discuss the disputed subsidy topic of Chinese state -owned enterprises.