Author: Chen Yixin

The U.S. -China trade war has been upgraded to the scientific and technological war, and it has also been burned to the TV female anchor of both parties. Trix Middot, the female anchor of Fos Finance Network; Reagan and China CCTV's Global TV Female Anchor Liu Xin (transliteration) eachReagan also set up a book against Liu Xin, ready to debate against the US -China trade war.When the trade war developed into the battle of the female television anchor in the United States and China, it showed that the confrontation between the two sides might be rising up.

From the mutual snacks of the two female anchors, it seems that although the leaders of the United States and China still reserved whether the U.S. -China trade war has become a situation, the female anchor of the TV station on both sides could not help but get the first to make it difficult.

Reagan said in her show last week that there is no choice in the United States, only a trade war with China.Liu Xin directly named Reagan, saying that Lagan was the spokesperson of Trump.

Liu Xin said in an exaggerated tone: She depicted the United States as a real victim, which means that the previous US government was deceived by a strange China to some extent.She was very sure that the United States would be killed, so indignant, her eyes almost spit.

Faced with Liu Xin's challenge, Reagan was certainly unwilling to show weaknesses. It took 11 minutes to fight against him, and invited the other party to debate on Twitter.Liu Xin responded: I heard it!I will find you again soon.But I don't want to play games that throw mud, if this is what you want.From oral confrontation to the development of both parties to prepare for debate, it immediately attracted the attention of all parties.If the debate becomes a bureau, its political meaning will be far beyond the general debate, and it will not have the symbolic significance of the debate between the people of the two countries, and even develop into a dispute over American patriotic VS. Chinese nationalism.If Beijing agrees with this debate, it may show ... intentionally raising confrontation and continuing to fight the trade war with the United States.

If the debate erupts a fierce spark, not only the battle between the United States and China will not stop, but the two sides may take a big step towards the conflict of civilization.The Policy Planning Division under the U.S. State Department is planning to further develop conflicts from strategic competitors, amendments, and ideological enemies into conflicts between different civilizations and races.Therefore, if this debate is held, it may be negotiated to provide favorable discussions for the conflict of civilization of the US State Department.

From this perspective, the wars of the two female anchors are considerable.Once the US -China confrontation rises, Taiwan's situation may not be as favorable as Tsai Ing -wen imagine.A few days ago, the United States agreed to rename the North American Affairs Coordination Committee as the Taiwan American Affairs Commission. Li Dawei, Secretary -General of the National Security Council, also visited Washington to meet with the US National Security Consultant Polton, which fully showed that the relationship between Taiwan and the United States was improving.Some media revealed that Li Dawei was paving the way for Cai Yingwen to visit Huafu.In this case, it shows that Trump will play Taiwan to challenge Beijing and even show off with China.

In order to kill a blood path in the party's primary election and won the re -election in 2020, Tsai Ing -wen has long been interested in his speech to visit Washington in Congress.It is just that the two major are difficult to be small. The mainland will not do it to the United States, but it will focus on Taiwan. It seems that the people of Taiwan are preparing to take the move!

(The author is a lecture professor at the Department of Political Science of China Cultural University)