Han Yonghong: Re -constructing Sino -US relations should be

Early North to read

Earlier this month, just on the same day of the US President Trump this month, the 25%tariffs on some Chinese goods were imposed on the same day (10th).Chinese policy with progress should be.

The above articles written by Kelly Magsamen, chief assistant to Asia -Pacific's Asia -Pacific Assistant Ministry of Defense Kelly Magsamen and the think tank US Progressive Center, MLANIE HART, proposed that the meaningful Sino -US relations to the United States, in the final analysisIn the end, it is promoted by the degree and health level of Americans.

What do you say?The authors list a series of standards in doubt, including: Does Americans and their offspring have a future?Can the United States continue to dominate scientific research and higher education?Can the national infrastructure run?Is there a good immigration mechanism to ensure that the economy is sustainable?Can the democratic construction in the United States maintain function and toughness?

To sum up, the United States first needs to take care of its own family, instead of initiating a trade war that damages Americans than to gain money; it is necessary to start national measures to revitalize national competitiveness to ensure that Americans are more clever strategies to ensure that AmericansBeing able to win in the new century competition, instead of launching the Cold War or suspending all cooperation with China.

What the two authors did not say more directly that in the face of China's severe challenges, the United States also had to find out the reasons and answers from itself.

As the Trump administration's offense on China is becoming stronger, comments that reflect the questioning and reflection of American knowledge elites like above are emerging more.The data also supports the questioning of the academic community. The survey report issued by researchers in Yale and other universities in March this year pointed out that the increase in tariffs in 2018 caused the US economy to lose $ 7.8 billion.Although this is only equivalent to 0.04%of the US GDP, these costs are mainly affected by American consumers.Today, as the hope of the termination of the trade war becomes slim, more people are asking for it. Is this good for Americans?

This is not to say that the American Intellectual Elite does not agree with Trump's criticism of Chinese intellectual property protection, industrial policy, economic system, and online spy status.Cathed Chinese challenges.

Edward Alden, a senior researcher at the International Trade, wrote this week that Trump's direction has been reversed this week. China is (the United States). Trump has exacerbated this trouble.

Ertiden has been a reporter for many years and is unable to adapt to the academic community: Why did Americans fall into the global economy?In -depth analysis of why the US economic and trade policies in the past 40 years have not helped ordinary Americans adapt to the challenges brought by globalization. He has witnessed the increasingly ugly struggle of anti -globalization in the United States.One of the topics was also sent Trump into the White House.

The elites close to Alden's positions do not oppose that targeted trade sanctions to force China to change part of their actions, but they emphasize that the United States should use the rules of the WTO and cooperate with allies to achieve its goals.They pointed out that the United States can defeat the Soviet Union in the Cold War that never rely on unilateralism but the opposite.Today, the United States also needs to continue to play a leading role and strengthen international construction such as the WTO. In particular, it is necessary to increase investment in domestic education and scientific research to assist American workers in transformation.Alden warned that the threat of global trade on the employment rate of the United States is just one aspect. In the era of subversive economy, in the next 10 years, driverless technology may easily replace the rice bowl of 3 million U.S. truck drivers.

These remarks implies one meaning: the great country cannot do it well and play a role, and it will bring calamity to itself and the world.This is not the United States. Among them, many people see that the deepening of the United States' trade war in China is becoming more and more capable.

Recently, some people have chewed the prediction of the trend of Sino -US relations in the trend of Sino -US relations again in the recent deterioration of Sino -US relations.Harvard professor, Harvard professor, who was famous for warning China Mercerous to defend the trap of Xiddid, often mentioned Mr. Li's wisdom.

Li Guangyao pointed out during his lifetime that China and the United States are inevitable to compete, but conflicts are not inevitable, because China is not a former Soviet Union and has no intention of changing the world.Ellison pointed out that when the economic balance is obviously inclined to China, if the United States cannot make effective responses, the current situation of Sino -US relations and international politics cannot be maintained.

It is true that China is rising, but the United States has not weakened as a whole. No one expected that there are still the United States, which is quite powerful and falling into the fear of China.Strongly uncomfortable to China's rise.For big powers such as China and the United States, to form a bilateral relations that benefit people and self -interest, the way out is that everyone maintains rationality and do its own affairs. China has emphasized this. Will the U.S. government listen to the voices of their own elites?