The eleventh round of trade negotiations in China and the United States not only did not reach any agreement, but the Trump administration imposed a 25%tariff on US $ 200 billion in goods. Some mainland scholars believed that this was a failure negotiation, and Sino -US relations were accelerating degradation.The United States also believes that it is not important to reach an agreement, because China and the United States are simply a strategic contest, and future cooperation will become more and more difficult.

The Washington Post has analyzed three endings of the Sino -US trade war. One is that Trump gets a good transaction, the other is bad transactions, and the third is that there are no transactions. The two options are not good for the United States, even for even the United States, evenIt is a defeat.The so -called good transaction is fully in line with the requirements of the United States.Poor transactions still exist in tariffs, and US companies have failed to enter the Chinese market well.The worst is that there are no agreements. What follows is the comprehensive trade war. The two countries continue to increase tariffs and trade barriers, and may even spread to other parts of the world. The economic consequences are extremely serious.

Shi Yinhong: The concessions are too fast to cause harsh conditions in the United States

When Yin Hong, a professor of the State Council and a professor at the School of International Relations of the Renmin University of China, was interviewed by this newspaper, he also believed that Sino -US relations were still accelerating. He said that the differences in the negotiations in this round.It was almost time to lead to the increasingly demanding and extensive conditions in the United States, and eventually led to the slow failure of Sino -US trade negotiations.

Voice of America quoted the view that the head of the US Think Tank Strategy and International Research Center (CSIS) China Research Project, Scott Kennedy, stated that even if an agreement was reached, it would not hinder the Trump administration's expansion of high -tech investment and export restrictions.And fierce competition with China in Asia and elsewhere.The article believes that the United States now regards China as the main strategic threat to the United States's global leading position, and has even changed its contact with China in diplomatic and military.Aaron Friedberg, a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University, said at the House of Representatives last week that development such as US -China relations will become more and more difficult to cooperate between the United States and China.