"Zhanzhong Jiuzi" has been convicted, causing international concern. Some Western politicians, human rights organizations, and media have accused the rights of harm to the peaceful assembly of Hong Kong people.The Chief Executive Lin Zhengyue immediately refuted, pointing out that it was a fallacy that harmed the reputation of the rule of law in Hong Kong.It is not surprising that the emergence of such comments in the world is not surprising. In fact, some Western politicians and media have always evaluated the legal sanctions of Hong Kong to violate those who occupy the law and riots. These comments not only harm the image of the rule of law in Hong Kong, affect foreign countries' perception of Hong Kong, but also escort such illegal activities in disguise to strengthen the intention of some people to challenge the law.Although the government must face up to and reduce the adverse effects of these comments. The public also responds to the focus of the incident calibration to avoid misleading by one -sided comments with political prejudice. These comments have a previous design that believes that the purpose of the occupation movement is to fight for democratic demands. The government proposes prosecutors for political retaliation, suppress freedom of speech and the right to peaceful assembly. The court's decision is a step of political suppression. The damage to the public at the ignorance of the action Such Western comments only pay attention to freedom and human rights, but they do not consider acting in violation of laws, harm public interests, and deprive others of human rights.The judge's verdict has clearly stated that it takes a long time to occupy the pavement and hinder traffic, and even the ambulance must bypass it to excessively deprive others of the basic rights of using the road.The judge quoted the jurisprudence of Hong Kong and the United Kingdom, saying that citizens could not affect their rights by the proportion of citizens. The above media did not mention it when reporting. In fact, the major Western media has supported it at the beginning of the occupation campaign and sympathized one -sidedly. So far, the illegal nature of action and the impact on the social economy, people's livelihood and public order are gently brought. As for the process, in the processThe violent impact is described as the consequences of the police "suppressing", and even the subsequent Mong Kok riots were beautified into the "fish and egg revolution".Even a few days before the Golden Bell area was officially launched, the "Citizen Square" incident has occurred. Dragon and Taoism conflicts broke out during the middle of the middle. This is not completely "peace".arrive. The British and American governments suppress the demonstration Super Hong Kong As for the examination only after a few years, the number of people arrested by the authorities in the incident and collecting evidence to collect evidence, but it shows that the authorities are cautious. On the other hand, Britain had a riots in multiple regions in 2011 and arrested more than 2,000 people. Among them, more than 1,000 were prosecuted, and the courts of various places started for 24 hours."Quick decision", Western media never scolded.If the Hong Kong court also comes to this set, it will definitely attract different reactions. The U.S. police and the judicial department also dealt with the "Occupy Wall Street" operation with severe means. At that time, the demonstrators occupied the Brooklyn Bridge in New York. The New York police immediately arrested more than 700 people.There are freedom and human rights that disrupt public security illegal. No country ruled by law will allow demonstrators to occupy the city center and main roads for a long time, paralyzing operations, and affecting people's lives.Western politicians and media treat rally operations in different places with dual standards.
