Zheng Weibin
In response to the President of Mainland China ... the Taiwan -two Taiwan plan proposed, Taiwan leader Tsai Ing -wen recently held the National Security Conference to issue a big battle against the battle, and proposed seven guidance programs.But take a closer look at these seven programs. It is more about restricting the exchanges between inside personnel and the mainland of Taiwan, not the two systems of Taiwan's Taiwan plan.This is a loser's acupoint plan. I am afraid that it is useless to introduce more programs.
At present, the two -system Taiwan plan in mainland China has not been released.What is the difference between one country and two systems in Hong Kong, and how to achieve negotiation with insiders in Taiwan is unknown.Tsai Ing -wen was so anxious to introduce the counter -program, and the cow was not right.What's more, nowadays, this is a way that is completely fixed and self -limited. I am afraid that it is not conducive to the future of Taiwan.This method has been doing what Taiwanese political parties have been doing in recent years.Not only the Democratic Progressive Party, but also the Kuomintang.In terms of cross -strait relations, it has not been able to break through, which is one of the reasons why Taiwan's space is getting narrow.
Take the peace agreement proposed by Kuomintang Chairman Wu Dunyi not long ago as an example.Any reaction?First, the peace agreement is not as effective as the mainland at this time.Second, not only the lack of core consensus between the two sides of the strait on this issue, but also because of Taiwan's internal lack of consensus.Similar issues can only be empty, and it is difficult to solve any problems.It is not possible to apply the right medicine. This is a common problem for the Taiwanese party.
In the inappropriate time, the disagreement on cross -strait discussions are not substantially effective except for the empty consumption inside Taiwan's internal consumption and triggering the saliva war between political parties.At the same time, this also reflects the changes in the Taiwanese political parties in the mainland's policy, lacks normal understanding, or cannot throw accurate issues due to other concerns.
What important changes have taken place in the mainland's Taiwan policy over the years?I used to resort to the 1992 consensus, but now it has turned to two systems.The major changes in these are the confirmation of the first China, which is no longer blurred; clarifying the relationship between Beijing and Taipei is the relationship between the central and local governments; the ultimate future of the two sides of the strait is unity.In the past, the Kuomintang used the forms of one middle school as a discussion to try to equal bilateral relations. At the same time, to some extent, it also implied unified options.
Although in 2016, Hong Xiuzhu, who had been a candidate for the Kuomintang Presidential election, had proposed a statement of progress in the same table, but the result was due to the internal restraint and the internal environment of Taiwan, which eventually led to the forced to refund the election.The discussion of the same table in the same table also returned to the orbit of each table in the first middle school.
Why is the same table in the same table more improved than the various tables in one middle school?The reason is that the former definitely belongs to the same middle school on both sides of the strait, and this middle is based on consensus and recognizes each other, and its direction is that the two sides of the strait will inevitably be unified in the future.For Taiwan, the key China consensus can be negotiated on both sides to determine.The latter is not the same. Although they all recognize the middle school, the connotation expresses its own expressions that it is unknown whether the two sides can reach a consensus in the future.Once you are unknown in the future, it may cause the two sides of the strait to be in a state of separation and unity.This is why Beijing is not assured of some Kuomintang.Although it is not Taiwan independence, it may go to Hua Du.
Generally speaking, although the each of the one -China table is large in cross -strait and lack of substantial dialogue, it helps to promote the development of cross -strait relations.Continue to talk about each other, and to obtain consensus on the core issues, obviously not to say.The limitations of each table in the first one are obvious.
Therefore, the mainland maintains high pressure and clarifies the relationship between the two sides of the strait and does not leave any independent possibilities for Taiwan, which is inevitable.This is not only related to the DPP, but also has been related to Taiwan independence, but also cannot keep up with the times of cross -strait relations.Such a result is naturally between the two sides of the strait. It is possible to create a basic treaty as a relatively equal identity, and gradually realize the peaceful unity of cross -strait, and eventually gradually become impossible.
Over the years, Taiwan has been consuming its own strength and limiting self -development space, which will inevitably only lead the mainland to ignore Taiwan's ideas and impose its plan to Taiwan.If Taiwan has the ability to counter, there is still room for turning.However, since the beginning of the self -study at the beginning of the year, although Tsai Ing -wen and the DPP have continued to increase the risk of cross -strait opposition, what they can rely on is only to use the US -Japanese media to call for the establishment of Japanese security relations or request foreign military forces to be inTaiwan was assisted when encountering mainland attacks.Is this really effective?
If there is no consensus within Taiwan in the future and the pressure of the mainland, there will only be more opportunities to miss Taiwan.At this moment, the two -system Taiwan plan in the mainland has not yet been introduced. How to obtain more public recognition of Taiwan's public in Taiwan and two systems and two systems in Hong Kong is a prerequisite for the success of the two systems of Taiwan in mainland China.This also means that Taiwanese political parties still have space.
For example, in the future of Taiwan's 23 million Taiwanese people, although it is very politically correct, it seems that it is tantamount to giving Taiwan an independent option.For Taiwan, it is more like a small loss.Facing the increasing volume of the mainland, Taiwan needs to be flexible.To establish a consensus within Taiwan before the cross -strait can further have consensus.The 1992 consensus has disappeared. If there is no new consensus, there will be only a break on both sides of the strait.
The author is Beijing Freelance
