Wang Jun: The intervention of the US judicial institution on the enrollment scandal of colleges and universities just shows that the error correction mechanism is also working.Looking at China, there is a longer way to go.

Recently, American universities have revealed enrollment scandals. Some celebrities use money for their children to buy opportunities for their children to enter American universities. Among them, there are both Ivy League schools like Yale and world -class universities such as Stanford.Needless to say, this news is impact once media disclosure.

At present, the US Department of Justice has launched a legal procedure for up to 50 suspects. Next, the relevant person has been subject to legal sanctions. The universities involved have taken action to dismiss relevant parties and cooperate with the prosecutor's investigation.It is conceivable that with the advancement of legal procedures, more people, especially those who accept bribes in schools, are responsible for this scandal.

There is no doubt that admission talents in universities need a fair program. If you use money to solve the problem of going to school, then the last line of defense of the enrollment work will be completely destroyed, and the university will no longer become universities. It is similar to the black market:As long as you pay, you can get the items and services you want, and Black means that it is not visible, and not anyone can enter the market. It requires a considerable threshold. Sometimes the parties have to set the agreement on the offensive and defensive alliance.The above logic is not only suitable for the United States, other places, including China, but also established.

The problem of enrollment from American universities, we naturally think of the situation of enrollment of Chinese universities.Although the shady in the enrollment of Chinese universities is rarely disclosed by the media, and few colleges and universities are held accountable for enrollment issues, this does not mean that there are fewer problems in enrollment in Chinese universities than in the United States.The fact is that there are more enrollment issues in Chinese universities. Not only are there a lot of tricks, but they are very secretive. It is little known to the public.This is because the Chinese bureaucratic system is concealed, the ugly thinking sets of thinking, the logic of small events and small things, which has caused all the chaos in the enrollment of Chinese universities to be fully exposed, and then it cannot be effective.Governance.

As far as the content of the media is currently disclosed, the originator of the American university's enrollment scandal is those rich parents. They bought the opportunity to enter school for their children through bribery.In China, the protagonist of the enrollment scandal is often some powerful people. They may not need to pay, and universities can present the degree they want.Imagine such a typical situation: because of the needs of official careers, officials urgently need a doctoral hat, and because of the needs of large cakes, colleges and universities want a piece of land, two or two shots are closed.As long as officials hinted, colleges and universities were willing to be up.

According to Chinese media reports, Shen Peiping, former deputy governor of Yunnan Province at Beijing Normal University, became a professor of the school in just five months after receiving a doctorate degree.The public will not know.It is puzzling that after the incident, the school was busy deleting the relevant records. So far, it has not given the public a statement, and no one is responsible for this matter, as if everything has never happened.From this incident, we can roughly understand the realistic scene in enrollment and title evaluation of Chinese universities.

People will not forget that just a few years ago, Cai Rongsheng, the former director of the Admissions and Employment Division of Renmin University of China, had more than 23.3 million bribes.According to media reports, Cai Li used the school's independent enrollment policies to bonuse the prices for admission. For example, for students with poor grades, as long as they spend 500,000 to 800,000 yuan, they can be reduced by more than 200 points through artistic specialty students.People's Congress.During his tenure, a total of 44 students helped, and the average helped student bribed Cai's amount of more than 500,000 yuan.

Although not anyone can get the help of Cai, the problem is that there are no windy walls in the world, and the moment of things will always come.

The above are all problems in Chinese universities due to personal accidents.In fact, there are still systematic stubbornness in the enrollment of Chinese universities. Because they have not been resolved for a long time, people seem to only hear it.

Looking back on the history of Chinese universities, it can be noted that the enrollment work of colleges and universities has changed from the early national unified proposition test papers to multiple test papers, especially in some Chinese economically developed regions or provinces with more college resources.Instead of using the national test paper, it is a proposition on its own. This is for other regions. For example, candidates who use the national unified test paper to convert the results and set up obstacles.Universities are facilitating some local students.

It stands to reason that students who enrolled in the same year in colleges and universities are appropriate to use the same admission test papers, but the facts of China are that the students who enrolled in the same year have achieved a variety of grades.Factors, such as sports specialty, Sanhao students, and various scientific competitions, they have won awards, and even national components are different, they will have the benefits of extra points.

There are too many extra points and excessive bonus items that need to be considered in enrollment work, which will inevitably lead to various counterfeit behaviors. Black box operations are almost unavoidable. For exampleIt is the same), or try to impersonate ethnic minorities and so on.Although China's competent education department in China has begun to clean up the college entrance examination bonus project in recent years, so far, it has not given the public a timetable for solving problems. In particular, how to ensure the openness, transparency and fairness of colleges and universities require a policy and system.The guarantee.

At present, the vast majority of Chinese universities are public and need financial investment to operate. Therefore, there seems to be a reason for local colleges and universities to admit more local students during enrollment. For example, candidates' parents are local taxpayers.However, China's national key universities, also known as universities in charge of the Ministry of Education, also prefer local students when enrollment.

According to the Chinese media, compared with the beginning of reform and opening up, the proportion of students from prestigious schools, such as Peking University, Tsinghua University, etc., has a lot lower from students from developed areas.Since the recruitment of enrollment, a prominent change in the student structure.Regarding the imbalance of students at the macro level, that is, regional discrimination, has different explanations and claims, and some even conflict with each other.

However, in any case, Chinese education management authorities and universities, especially those prestigious schools that are expected, have not given the society a convincing or logical statement, that is, how to reflect the fairness and fairness in enrollment.When Chinese candidates encounter admission discrimination, the parties seem to have nowhere to seek legal aid, or go to relevant departments to complain.

It should be pointed out that the above mentioned above is only one of the corners of the acceleration of Chinese colleges and universities.All unconventional things in the enrollment of Chinese universities, trample on fairness and fairness, are either because they are too common and do not blame the public, or because the public cannot know because it is too concealed.You know, in China, when someone pointed out the problems of relevant departments, these departments often do not actively solve the problem, but to solve the problem first.This may be the crux of many problems in China that has not been solved for a long time.

In the end, whether a system and system are reasonable and running normally, whether there is a fast and effective error correction mechanism after a problem.As we all know, American universities, especially those universities with a long history of running schools, have a high degree of reputation worldwide.The emergence of the scandal is actually not terrible. What is afraid of is that such a thing refuses to correct it, and it will appear again in the future.The intervention of U.S. judicial institutions is exactly that the error correction mechanism is also working.There are reasons to believe that the future enrollment process will be more fair in the future of American universities that experience the scandal, and if we look at China, we have a longer way to go.

(Note: The author is an independent scholar. This article only represents the author's personal point of view.