Huaweis attack on the United States is reasonable,

Ming Pao News Agency

In the face of the Chinese telecommunications equipment giant, which has always been low -key in the United States, Huawei, which has always responded to low -key response, launched a great counterattack this year. First, the founder Ren Zhengfei accepted a number of foreign media interviews and denied that the product opened the back door for the Chinese government to engage in spy activities, saying that there would never be any any any of them would make any any any of the government.During the Barcelona World Mobile Communications Conference in Barcelona in Spain last month, Huawei senior officials countered the US charges at the meeting at the meeting.The ban on Huawei was unconstitutional, and at the same time sued the Canadian border authorities to the vice chairman of Huawei and CFO Meng Wanzhou before arrested, infringing on their personal rights.Huawei has a series of operations, and the result of unknown ultimate victory and defeat, but to recover justice through the US -Canada judicial procedures, it is reasonable and beneficial, which helps the world to clearly smear and slander and strive for international recognition.

Different from the nature of ZTE

US allegations lack of evidence

Last year, in the 2019 National Defense Authorization Law adopted by the U.S. Congress, the US government agreed to the US government's identification of national security risks, and government agencies were prohibited from purchasing Huawei equipment.Later, the United States also used various opportunities to pressure them to other countries, demanding that Huawei excluded from the list of 5G network contractors.On December 1st last year, at the request of the United States, the Canadian police arrested Meng Wanzhou, who transferred in Vancouver, and caught Sino -Canada relations into the freezing point, and the U.S. Department of Justice also sued the court for 23 crimes in Huawei.

It is worth noting that since the occurrence of Huawei crisis, the Chinese government, which has endured humiliation in the ZTE crisis, has been high -profile condemnation, and has reached revenge on Canada.Instead, Huawei is low -key, but it is constantly making public relations in the international public relations and expressed their willingness to take action to relieve the security concerns from various countries.Since this year, with the upgrading of various suppression of the United States, Huawei's attitude has begun to become hard.During the World Mobile Communications Conference last month, Huawei's rotating chairman Guo Ping wrote in the Financial Times that the United States' main motivation to suppress Huawei is two: First, after Huawei is afraid of the market, the United States cannot surveillance and collect intelligence through Huawei system; twoI am afraid that the United States will be behind in the 5G field.Subsequently, Meng Wanzhou's lawyer team and Huawei have adopted legal actions in the United States and Canada to sue the US -Canada government.At the press conference of Shenzhen Headquarters, Huawei accused the US government suspected of invading Huawei's servers to steal emails and source codes suspected of invading Huawei.The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs immediately supported Huawei's actions and understandable.

It is generally believed that the Chinese government's attitude towards the Huawei incident and the ZTE incident is very different, or because ZTE did violate the company's previous reconciliation agreement with the US government, and the evidence was conclusive and there was no doubt that it could only be confession.The United States' allegations of the safety risk of Huawei products have not been evidenced by so far. As for the US sanctions on Iran, it also belongs to the US domestic law and is not authorized by the United Nations.

For Huawei's high -profile counterattack, public opinion quoted the previous case of Russia's anti -virus software Kabasky's similar lawsuits against the US government that as long as the court acknowledged that the government's ban was a preventive rather than punitive, Huawei would lose the lawsuit.As the US Congress and the government have signed the National Defense Authorization Law, it is difficult for Huawei to prove to the court that there is no hidden concern for their products.The lawsuit may further enhance the global attention to Huawei's allegations, but it will strengthen the stereotype of Huawei's closely related to the Chinese government, which will have a negative impact on its market promotion.

The cracks of the United States and the allies have been born

The best defense is offensive

However, the above -mentioned public opinion ignored some important facts, that is, as the United States suppressed Huawei's means becoming more and more embarrassing, the words of words were becoming more and more horizontal.The longer this drooling war continued, the more famous Huawei's reputation, as if free advertising, and even led to the expansion of the differences between the United States and the European allies.The attitude of Germany and Italy has been swaying. A few weeks later in the UK, the final statement will become the vane of the development of the situation.

More importantly, Trump, which has been reported by major events, is about to sign a presidential order for Huawei equipment to from entering the United States.Whether it will be a card involving interest relationships between Washington and Beijing.

The best defense is offensive. Huawei's seemingly high -profile counterattack this time is actually for defense, in order to maintain the market that has been working hard for many years around the world.Huawei's counterclaims of the U.S. government seem to be high -profile and tough, but one is based on US laws, and the other is that the prosecution place is in the United States. At least in the posture, confidence in the US political and judicial system is still reasonable and favorable.

The construction of 5G technology and the Internet of Things will provide a strong momentum of economic growth in the future. Based on the cost -effectiveness and quality of Huawei's products, except for its competitors, the telecommunications industry of various countries may not want to see that it is excluded from 5G construction.EssenceJust as Huawei founder and president Ren Zhengfei said in an interview with the BBC recently that the United States cannot destroy us.The world needs Huawei because we are more advanced.Even if they persuade more countries not to use Huawei for the time being, we just narrow the scale.Huawei ’s recent anti -defending move, whether it can win in the second, is also difficult to return to the US market, but connecting the United States’ unfair competition in global network monitoring and protectionism, can be described as the key to the United States' key to hit the United States.Essence