Early North to read
Fuzhou youth Zhao Yuyi rescued the violent woman who kicked the violence in the conflict and was criminally detained for 14 days.Sima Guang smashed the cylinder in the Northern Song Dynasty, would it be fined if he encountered today's law?These two things, the former is a hot news that has recently detonated the Internet of China, and the latter is a popular publicity painting on the wall of Xiamen community.
The common theme of the two is: the cost of seeing righteousness.
With the strong attention of public opinion, the fate of the 22 -year -old young man Zhao Yu appeared a big turn yesterday.The Jin'an District Procuratorate concluded that Zhao Yu was a legitimate defense, but exceeded the need to limit the act of stopping illegal violations. In order to promote the righteousness of the society and encourage righteousness, he decided not to prosecute.Li, who was kicked by Zhao Yu, was monitored and lived on February 19 for his suspected crime of illegal invasion.
At this time, the Zhao Yu family had been frightened for more than 50 days, and the family was almost in trouble.According to Zhao's complaint, the incident originated on the evening of December 28 last year. He accompanied his wife at home and heard a woman who was in the upstairs. She went downstairs to see that the woman's neighbor's house was kicked open.Neighbors, fisting her right hand.Zhao Yu stepped forward and pulled Li Mou, and suffered from Li Mou. Zhao knocked down Li, and Li Mou held his fingers. Zhao Yu kicked Li's belly.Unexpectedly, three days later, Li took a bite and alarmed that Zhao Yu injured him. After being identified as a second -level disability, the police detained Zhao Yu for suspected intentional injury. Therefore, Zhao Yu missed the moment when his child was born.And Li's violent plot, Ms. Zou, who was almost killed, also confirmed in the media.
This rape attempted to play mahjong, seeing righteousness is a topic of fourteen days. Since Zhao Yu a few days ago (17th), he publicly shouted unjustly through social media, and complained that he might have to compensate 600,000 yuan (RMB 120,000).Instantly, many netizens were filled with indignation, and some female netizens believed that the matter could not be silent. If he did not support Zhao Yu, he would have encountered a mob on his own, and no one would dare to help.What makes many people particularly angry is that when Li, who claimed to be a second -level disability, accepted the media in the media, claimed that they had played mahjong here, and it seemed that life was not affected.
In front of the public, the Fuzhou Jin'an Branch, which was initially applied for the arrest of Zhao Yu with intentional injury, was not approved by the Procuratorate, and transferred him to the procuratorate on the 20th. One day later, the Procuratorate quickly made the decision of the aforementioned non -prosecution.Yu finally relieved.
However, in the eyes of the Chinese public, there are still many doubts about this case to be unveiled.
Zhao Yu may still face the risk of civil claims, because from the qualitative perspective of the procuratorate, Zhao Yu is considered to be too defensive, which means that the prosecutor is not sure that he is not guilty. He may think that his crime is mild, considering social effects, etc.The reason is decided not to prosecute.In other words, Zhao Yu was completely innocent. This layer was unknown, so Zhao Yu might be left by Li Yu's civil claim.
In addition, whether Li was attempted to rape, there was no saying so far, only to indicate that he beaten Ms. Zou and suspected of illegal invasion of residence.
The legal issues pay attention to the applicability of the legal provisions, and it is not necessarily consistent with the axioms in the public's mind. It is particularly taboo in law. For example, the movement of fighting against mobs exceeds the degree of stopping its behavior.Suspicious suspicion of privacy.However, according to the general common sense, this is not a very complicated case. Why did the Fuzhou police not investigate Li as early as possible, but they were sentenced to 14 days to punish Zhao Yu. After that, he was transferred to the procuratorate?Is the threshold for legitimate defense too high in China's criminal law?Police and prosecutors have different opinions. Does it reflect that the police's law enforcement standards are not grasped insufficient?Why should justice be stretched through public opinion?
Just as the Zhao Yu case was full of noise, netizens broke the news that Sima Guang's fined law propaganda paintings appeared in Xiamen, which not only associated the Zhao Yu case, but also felt that such publicity could not make people feel the power of the law positively.Instead, it highlights its rigidity and almost rudeness.
The difficulty of seeing righteousness is difficult to protect people's confidence in reality, institutional level and specific implementation links, which affects people's confidence.
In response to the case of Zhao Yu, there are still many voices asking: He was squatted for 14 days when he was detained?Many sharp comments have also been released. For example, the law cannot demand that every defender is Huang Feihong, and LSquo, LSquo; and calling on the Zhao Yu case to improve and improve the legal system.In fact, the example of seeing righteousness is not uncommon in the Chinese media. If it can really promote Zhao Yu's case from the righteousness of the case to the institutional justice, it is the true encouragement of seeing the righteousness.It is not more powerful than justice to persuade the world to do good deeds.
