Shi Zhiyu
The United States has accused Huawei in China that may provide the CCP's invasion of the communication systems of various countries. Huawei believes that Ziyu is unblocked, because Huawei has never settled the back door, and the Chinese government has never asked Huawei to engage in intelligence work. It is simply not knowing what the United States and its allies are in Luo Zhi.
The logic of Huawei's allegations and refutation is exactly the same as that of the United States accusing China threatening the freedom of HNA China.Washington has accused China of the islands and reef construction in the South China Sea that threatened the Gonghai. Beijing refuted that the South China Sea has never had the problem of freedom of navigation. Only the US warships are martial arts and bumped.
The same logic behind the two things is to describe the increasing ability of China to have the ability to grow through the imagination and mobilization of civilized conflicts to describe the potential threats of criminals of the difference in civilization.
The common logic of civilized conflict has a clear trajectory to find.According to this logic, China has built a military function is an island and reef, which is enough to destroy the freedom of navigation. This is not related to the Chinese government. This record is not related, because China is not a liberal country and does not use power checks and balances.System, so it is not trusted.Unable to check and balance, is the biggest political taboos of a liberal country. There are only two solutions: sent warships to intimidate China not to overcome thunder ponds or transform the Chinese government.
The logic of accusing Huawei as a national security threat in various countries is that Huawei, as a Chinese company, must be ordered to be in the Chinese government. This has nothing to do with whether the Chinese government has the idea, records, and planning of the Chinese government to give the Huawei order.Because if so, since there is no system of balance, it will not only be stopped, but it will not even know.The point is that you cannot check and balance, not the intention.Therefore, there are only two solutions to organize cross -country forces to block Huawei or transform the Chinese political system.
There is no fixed answer whether China is an alien civilization, but it depends on the United States to understand the relationship between the current world. The most important of which are of course liberalism and realism.The latter is the standard for their own interests when they are in politics.The common features of the two are universal imagination, and the so -called universal is that everyone should learn, can learn, and must learn.
Liberalism is universal, and it cannot accept the actions, thoughts, and systems that do not match liberalism.Therefore, at a critical moment, as soon as the liberal Sword of the Sword of Liberalism comes out, European and American countries often cannot resist such political correctness, but must return to the team.struggle.This is because after hundreds of years of political and religious and ideological struggles, liberalism has constituted the core of contemporary European and American Christian religious states.If some government does not attach to this agenda of political correctness, it will lose legitimacy in its own country.
However, after all, countries have their own advantages.Under the context of the religion of liberal Christians in various countries, realism plays a role in both aspects.First, attach importance to national interests, which leads to the cost of education in non -Christian and non -liberal countries, and even embarrassed each other, causing the imagination of the civilized fault to fail.The two world wars are not mainly followed the differences in the organization of civilization. Although all countries have their own civilized conflict imagination, it is impossible to integrate at all.
The second is that realism urges countries to face the world situation that universal civilization cannot achieve overnight. Therefore, it advocates to replace confrontation with exchanges and educate to ease intervention.The United States forced everyone to choose.
Civilization is not conflicting, because civilization is a process of communication and learning, and it is a degree problem.However, once it is believed that civilization must be universal, and the differences in civilization have become a threat, so forcing everyone to conduct self -defense intervention for self -defense in the fear of the civilization fault.
In accordance with this, China has become the goal of civilized conflict, or the source of threats and fear, not its own policy or institutional decision.There must be an actor who holds a universal civilization first to turn the concept of China into a alien outside the universal civilization relationship network.
There is no mission of universal civilization in Chinese history. Even the romantic ideas of the Datong world are never a guidelines for action.Although the ancient dynasties had no shortage of expansion, there was a habit that must be imposed on people, but this is different from institutional or value transformation, and even often wants to use material temptation to exchange for surface etiquette to avoid value conflict.
Only under the idea of universal civilization, it will quote the relationship between the universal civilization to mobilize people's hearts, find a alien -shaped, and launch a civilized conflict.This can be manifested as two situations in practice.First of all, the Crusaders who set their own universal civilization. In order to transform, educate, and destroy alien civilization, select objects, and launch an offense.For example, the United States in the 21st century wants to transform the political culture and system of the Middle East, or for example, Trump wants China to carry out structural reforms to de -nationalization.The goal (China) in this situation is passive, and at best, it is not convinced to take resistance.
Secondly, he believed that he was threatened by different civilization and adopted self -defense.The establishment of 5G in China and Huawei brings such fear.Originally thought that China could not be a climate, or that it could be educated and transformed with a comprehensive relationship with China. When things were contrary to their wishes, a script of civilized conflict was opened.Civilized conflict Swordsman sacrificed, almost overnight, sweeping the two houses of the United States, the Republican and Democratic Party, the Red Army and the Blue Army in the academic circles. Who is fighting for?
Once European and American countries are wrapped in the most fundamental civilization community of liberalism, community awareness has increased sharply, and hostile morale has risen. No matter how the Chinese government or Huawei adjusts, it must not be able to eliminate fear.As a result, all things related to China have become the Chinese government's planning and motivation in the eyes of Europe and the United States, and its ultimate goal can only be understood as to overthrow the world order of liberalism.The only turn of China ’s fierceness is to wait through strength operations and patience, waiting for realism to recover.
The author is a professor at the political department of Taiwan University
There is no mission of universal civilization in Chinese history. Even the romantic ideas of the Datong world are never a guidelines for action.Although the ancient dynasties had no shortage of expansion, there was a habit that must be imposed on people, but this is different from institutional or value transformation, and even often wants to use material temptation to exchange for surface etiquette to avoid value conflict.
