The Hong Kong Consumer Council recently named the famous water bromate content of the famous bottle of water brand farmers in Mainland China, the well -known bottled water brand farmer, and the company issued a lawyer's letter and request to apologize by the company., And this test sample category has an accidental apology.The incident caused a heated discussion among the netizens in Lu and Hong Kong's "bullying" of mainland enterprises.
This turmoil originated from the 30 -loading water sample test report published on Monday (July 15) of the Hong Kong Consumer Council, which is divided into two categories: distilled water and pure water, and natural mineral water.The samples of Shanquan are included in the natural mineral water category, and the potential carcinoma (bromate) per liter of 3 micrograms per liter of liters of 3 micrograms meets the EU standard limit.
When the reporter asked at the press conference whether this reflected the safety of the bottled water, Huang Fengxian, Director of the Consumer Council, responded that the test results of the samples of Nongfu Mountain Spring were "unbridled" and could still drink it safely, but it was said that it was relatedTest results are a good reference for merchants to continuously improve their products.
Nongfu Spring Spring sent a lawyer letter to the Hong Kong Consumer Council the next day (July 16), criticizing the test report to make an unsteady evaluation, and appointed a lawyer to the Consumer Council for clarification and apology.The incident immediately rushed to the hot search list of mainland China.
After a few days, the Hong Kong Consumer Council issued a statement on Thursday (July 18) that after meeting with Nongfu Spring, they learned that the products were not "natural mineral water", but "drinking natural water".After the scoring is re -rated, the sample detects 3 micrograms of bromate per liter, which is within the range of the "drinking water" criteria, which can be consumed safely.The Consumer Council was "sorry" caused by the difference between the sample classification of this test sample.
This storm has caused great controversy in the network of Lugang.Many mainland netizens left messages to support Nongfu Spring, saying "Don't judge the highest standards, we have our standards."Many Hong Kong netizens scolded Nongfu Spring's behavior "bullying".
Jiang Yuhuan, a member of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Election Commission, expressed respect for the decision of the Hong Kong Consumer Council. It is believed that the association is to understand more information and the amendment of the background.
Chen Weiqiang, a lecturer Chen Weiqiang, a lecturer in Hong Kong University of Technology, pointed out that the Hong Kong Consumer Council divided the bottled water into two categories, one was "distilled water and pure water", and the other was "natural mineral water".Nongfu Spring is classified as the latter.However, Nongfu Spring quoted the standards of mainland China, saying that its own products are natural water/natural spring water, and should not be evaluated at the standard of mineral water.Because the definitions of the two parties are different, the conclusions are naturally different, and it is difficult to say who is right and wrong.
Chen Weiqiang believes that the Hong Kong Consumer Council may not be wrong in the incident, but in the end, he chose to apologize and indeed give people a sense of "kneeling low", and the behavior of Nongfu Spring is inevitable to give people a sense of wealth.
He said that the Consumer Council is a legal institution in Hong Kong and has published different product testing reports for many years, prompting the industry to improve its quality and has its credibility.The Consumer Council should continue to play the role of supervision enterprises in the future, but be fully prepared.
