After the Chinese Supreme Court decided to build the people's court's case library, it caused the public to worry about whether the referee's book network would be replaced and the judicial public turn.In this regard, the Supreme Court stated that the case library and the referee document network is a relationship that supplements and complement each other, and it is not to open the same level with the Kuudai.com.
According to the People's Daily, the person in charge of the relevant departments of the Supreme Court solicited the reporter on Friday (December 22) to solicit the case of the case of the people's court case library.
The China Magistrate Book Network is a unified referee document open platform established by the Supreme Court in 2013, and it is also one of the three major platforms of judicial disclosure.However, the number of online documents has fallen year by year since 2020, from 19.2 million in 2020 to 14.9 million in 2021, 10.4 million in 2022, and only 5.11 million pieces from 2023.
The person in charge of the Supreme Court responded to this that since 2021, the work of optimizing the disclosure mechanism of the referee has been carried out, but it has never "stopped" the document online.In order to solve the problems of inconvenient use, inaccurate retrieval, and different standards of the referee document network, the Supreme Court decided to build the "People's Court Case Library" in July 2023.
The person in charge pointed out that compared with the public way of "uploading things and simply accumulation" before, the case library will include the authority of the reference demonstration value of the case and the approval of the Supreme Court and approved by the Supreme Court.Cases will become the "upgraded version" of referee documents in terms of application and efficiency in the future.
For the disclosure of the referee documents, the person in charge responded that the referee document network that is currently disclosed will continue to play a role. At the same time, the standards of referee documents also need to be optimized and the mechanism must be standardized.
The person in charge said that the next step will be combined with online openness and offline inquiries to protect the public in accordance with the law.At the same time, people's courts at all levels will still publish referee documents on the referee documents on a regular basis, and will also more carefully coordinate and consider the relationship between meeting the right to meet the right of public knowledge, supervision and protection of data, information security, and personal privacy.
The person in charge also said that after the case library is completed, the public will also be opened to the public including experts, scholars, lawyers, and parties.
