Within 14 hours of the beginning of the evening of Tuesday (October 18), North Korea bombarded the "buffer zone" of the East and West Sea Maritime Maritime Maritime, and fired more than 350 shells in the front and back three rounds.South Korea had a serious warning to North Korea's dense provocation, informing the move that it would seriously endanger the peace and stability of the Korean Peninsula to the international community.
South Korea ’s joint staff headquarters said that North Korea launched about 100 shells in the western waters at 10 pm on Tuesday evening on Tuesday, and then launched about 150 from the Eastern Sea from the Eastern Sea at 23:00Favorite shells.The shells fell on the north side of the northern boundary line on the maritime buffer area of the South Korean military agreement in the north side of the northern front of the Korean North Korea.
At 12:30 noon on Wednesday, North Korea launched more than 100 cannonballs from the area along the Yellow Hainan Road and counties to the western waters.The cannon shells also fall in a buffer north of the northern boundary (NLL).
The Korean Army pointed out that North Korea's act of launching artillery shells to the buffer blatantly violated the 1999 military agreement signed in 2018. North Korea's continuous provocation seriously endangered the peace and stability of the Korean Peninsula to the international community.Under the close cooperation system of South Korea and the United States, the Korean Army strictly tracks and monitor the movement of North Korea, and strengthens the response.
Analysis pointed out that North Korea ’s military demonstration is a" military exercise "launched by South Korea on the 17th and the shells of artillery shells conducted in Tieyuan County, Jiangyuan.
The General Staff of the North Korean Army condemned on the 15th: "The enemy (South Korea) made military provocations this morning, and fired more than 10 aircraft guns again, so we issued a instructions for threat warning shooting."
Scholar: North Korea deliberately provoked the induction of South Korea to abolish military agreements
Liang Maojin, the principal of the North Korean Institute of Korea, pointed out that South Korea and Mei are conducting shooting training south south of the Korean "buffer" on the Korean and North Korean land of Tieyuan, Jiangyuan Road.Announce the abolition of the agreement.This is to push all the responsibilities to the agreement to South Korea, and use this as an excuse for strategic provocations such as the 7th nuclear test.
South Korea ’s Central Daily quoted senior officials of the ruling party to report that the recent one -conclusion of North Korea’ s successive force, Yin Xiyue government agreed that it would not take the lead in abolishing the 1999 military agreement.
The official said that if South Korea announced the abolition of the 1999 military agreements, North Korea is likely to make military provocation in a more serious way.
Professor Jin Dongzhang, a professor at the University of North Korea, said that in order to manage the crisis and avoid conflict, it is necessary to maintain the 1999 military agreement.
Originally, experts generally believe that considering that the Chinese government is holding the 20th National Congress, North Korea should not be provoked, but the actual situation is unexpected.
Robert Manning, a senior researcher at Stin Sheng Center in the United States, told VOA in the United States that North Korea's shelling is to cause a "false crisis" to express his anger in South Korea and the United States.At the same time, Pyongyang may also show dissatisfaction with China. China may be pressured by North Korea for the seventh nuclear test during the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China.
Another analysis believes that North Korea looks at the face of China and does not dare to launch missiles to avoid stimulating China.
As the Korean army's "military exercise" will continue until the 28th, the Korean military believes that North Korea may have launched provocations again and is strengthening the response.
