On September 1, a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Wang Wenbin presided over a regular press conference.
Some reporters asked questions that since Japan launched nuclear pollution water, Japanese officials have repeatedly claimed that there is a scientific basis for discharge sea and completely transparent.China is the only country that opposes Japan's sea and demands that China has revoked import restrictions.What are the comments of the spokesman about this?
Wang Wenbin said that the Japanese remarks are completely upside down black and white, confusing audiovisual.
Wang Wenbin pointed out that if the Japanese respect for science, Why should the scope of evaluation of the international atomic energy agency strictly limited and exclude other possible disposal plans outside the sea?Why should the radioactive elements be designed as a harmless mascot image, and the Fukushima nuclear pollution water is also mixed with the normal operation drainage of nuclear power plants across the world?If the Japanese party respects science, why is the nuclear pollution water being strongly questioned by the international community, causing universal indignation?Why do not several countries have publicly supported the Japanese rowing operations so far?In fact, those countries that verbally support Japan are exactly the country with the largest number of imported Japanese aquatic products.If Japan respects science, why are up to 40 % of the people in Japan opposed to the sea?Why do more than 80 % of the Japanese people expressed concerns and dissatisfaction about this?
Chinese competent authorities take emergency measures for Japanese aquatic products in their place of origin, which is a legitimate need to maintain food safety and public health.For regions including South Korea, Russia, Malaysia, Thailand, etc., there have also been corresponding preventive measures. Is it possible for Japan to pass on the risk of nuclear pollution to the world, and other countries cannot take emergency protection measures to maintain marine environment and people's health.?How can the world make this reason?
Wang Wenbin pointed out that the currently disclosed Fukushima nuclear pollution water monitoring data are only provided by Japanese unilateral.The official website of the International Atomic Energy Institution also clearly labeled the Fukushima nuclear pollution water column. The data and data were provided by the Tokyo Electric Power Corporation in Japan.When the monitoring mechanism is absent, it should be used as the Japanese side of the supervisor, but it is the only testor of its only nuclear pollution water data. This test is scientific, transparent, and credible.
Wang Wenbin said that Japanese side claims that China is the only country that opposes Fukushima nuclear pollution water, which is purely ignored the facts and reversed right and wrong.Maintenance of human health.On this issue, Japan needs not to face which country, but the entire international community .What Japan should do is not to be wronged as the victim's face, but to review and reflect as the victim.
Wang Wenbin emphasized that we advise the Japanese side to face the concerns of neighboring countries and the international community, and immediately stop passing the risk of nuclear pollution to the world. Do not stand on the opposite side of the entire international community, otherwise we will assume long -term morality and legal responsibilities.
Source: Beijing Daily Client