Trump and Harris held a debate. Harris's performance beyond the expectations that people set for her, and the debate skills were excellent.Harris grabbed Trump in the debate, and he seemed to be like a big bear, and he was very passive to enter the trap she set.
For example, the border policy is the weakness of Harris. When Trump attacked her, Harris referred to supporters to leave Trump's rally.Trump really made a plan and left the border issue to explain his "biggest and most incredible rally."When Trump missed the opportunity to make Harris's weakness, he was furious by Harris.Republicans are frustrated by Trump's debate.
The two hosts of the US Broadcasting Corporation obviously favored Harris in the debate and checked and corrected Trump four times, but did not correct Harris once.This is obviously a three -to -one debate.The host's favorable parties in the debate have violations of professional ethics and leave a boring page for the Broadcasting Corporation.In fact, Trump and Harris both talked about the wrong figures and violated the facts. Trump's lies were more, and Harris also had lies.
Bayon's debate with Trump led Biden to withdraw from the election.Trump's debate with Harris loses on the surface, but far from Waterloo.Historical data shows that it is unlikely that any debate will determine the results of the presidential election (except Bayeng).Gallop's survey data pointed out that from 1988 to 2004, the average change in the support rate of candidates caused by 13 presidential candidates' debate was only 1 percentage point.People are very concerned about the debate of the presidential candidate, but the debate is rarely decisive because everyone has clearly claimed the policies of various candidates.Both candidates have their own basic disk and have decided to vote for whom.
After the debate between Trump and Harris, both issued a statement claiming that they had defeated their opponents.However, according to a fast public opinion survey of the United States Cable Television News Network, about six tenth debate observer believes that Harris's performance is better than Trump, and about four -tenths say that Trump's performance is betterEssence
Although Harris performed well, this debate did not seem to change most of the most voters, because 82%of people showed that the debate did not affect their choices for the president. Only 4%said they were watching watching.After changing the idea.The report issued by the Pew Research Center on September 9 claimed that Harris and Trump had 49%of their support among registered voters.The error amplitude of polls was 1.3%.The debate does not determine the winning or defeat of the campaign, but economic issues determine voters' votes.Various polls show that the economy is still the most concerned issue this year.This must be compared with Trump and Harris's economic policy proposition.
Harris claims that the Bayeng government rescued the US economy.The fact is that most American people believe that the inflation of Biden's ruling period has made the situation of most Americans worse than before the epidemic.Trump's tax cuts and relaxation controls have promoted economic growth, leading to tightening the labor market and rising wages. Although there is a Sino -US trade war, it has not led to inflation.In the first three years of Trump's governance, the ratio of federal expenditure accounted for an average of 20.5%of the GDP, while the ratio of Biden's governing was 25.8%.This is the main reason why the American people have not recognized Biden Economics so far.Trump's governance has laid the foundation for its economic policy proposition.
Harris economic policy proposal continues Biden Economics, but it is more radical than Biden, reflecting the characteristics of left -wing populist.Harris supports the highest capital profit tax rate to 33%, which will expand the startup cost of small enterprises to $ 50,000 (about S $ 64,900), restore the expanded child tax credits, and set the construction of 300Thousands of new housing goals, and provide tax discounts for the first home buyers, including US $ 25,000 down payment assistance, prohibit enterprises from raising the price of groceries, and propose to levy the minimum tax rate for billionaires and increase the stock repurchase tax three times.EssenceThe focus of Harris's economic policy is to combat the rich and give ordinary people more benefits.
"Trump Economics" is more reliable than him
The promise of Harris left -wing populism can capture the support of the people at the bottom, but it will expand government expenditure and promote US debt.A rapid analysis of the Federal Budget Commission found that these plans will increase the federal budget deficit in the next 10 years to $ 1.7 trillion.At present, US debt has reached 35 trillion US dollars, and it is irresponsible to continue to increase US Treasury bonds according to Harris' practice.Countries such as Venezuela and Argentina who have experienced left -wing populism have proved their commitment to lack financial support, and can only bring disaster to the country.
$ 35 trillion of government bonds must be based on the continuous growth of the US economy and based on creating wealth."Trump Economics" is reliable. His tax cuts and relaxation control thinking are proved to be based on the creation of wealth, not based on the distribution of wealth.By the end of President Obama, the US economy has achieved employment growth for 76 consecutive months, and this trend has continued until President Trump's term.In 2019, the unemployment rate in the United States fell to 3.5%of the lowest level in 50 years.The low unemployment rate lasts until February 2020. The crown disease outbreak.
Harris economic policy advocates common sense of economics, and the introduction of laws that combat price fraud to curb prices is ridiculous.Economics theory demonstrates the consequences of the highest price or lowest limit. The former will lead to excessive supply, and the latter will lead to supply.The lowest limit for food prices. The consequences are that the goods appear under the shortage of goods.The appearance of the black market is a supplement to the supply of goods, but it has disrupted the entire market. To crack down on the black market, the government has to pay management costs.
The price of American grocery products has risen, which has both the problem of interrupting the supply chain, as well as the problem of currency water release of the US Federal Reserve.Harris prescribed the wrong prescription on economic issues, which can only prove that the US economy under her rule will lose their growth momentum.Choosing the president who created wealth, or the president who chooses to allocate wealth depends on the votes of the American people.
The author is a commentator in Shanghai, China
