Source: Zhongshi News Network
Author: Hong Qichang
In 1993, the 30th anniversary of the Wang Gu of Singapore.Looking back at the past, we must first realize that the international environment and cross -strait situations will not remain unchanged, and they will continue to change. Looking forward to the future, we should keep in mind that Wang Gu talks about this historical fact, cherish and grasp its spiritual heritage, and promote the time and time together.The movement plan is not nostalgic for the "1992 Consensus" in a specific space -time environment.
A cross -strait talks 30 years ago have its international environment and cross -strait conditions, including the collapse of Berlin Walls, the Warsaw Convention and the disintegration of the Soviet Union.Confidence also boosted the willingness of China's contact with the non -communist world.In addition, at that time, the results of Taiwan's economic transformation were significant. Mainland China also reiterated that he insisted on the reform and opening up of reform and opening up during the "1992 South Tour" in Deng Xiaoping. Beijing decided to build a "socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics."Drive the rapid development of cross -strait economic and trade relations.
Under that time and space environment, the cross -strait governments recognize the needs of the current situation. Leaders on both sides of the strait also showed wisdom and height.The issue of transactional issues of power participation, so there are 92 Hong Kong talks and the historical facts of the 93 Wang Gu's talks.
After 30 years of talks between Wang Gu, the international environment and cross -strait conditions were very different from the time.In the international environment, the current US -China strategic relations have changed, and the United States has abandoned the US -China strategic partnership under the policy structure of the ENGAGEMENT (English) policy structure, which has transformed into a strategic competition relationship between the United States and China.In international politics, cross -strait relations are not just issues of "how to locate each other's political relations" on the Taiwan Strait, but the strategic competition pattern of the United States and China and cross -strait relations under the Indo -Pacific strategic structure.In other words, the development of cross -strait relations and the main issues of Taiwan is the key variables of how to maintain the peace and stability of the Indo -Pacific regional situation, how to arrange the global industrial supply chain layout strategy, and how to adhere to the value of freedom and democracy and lifestyle.It is a topic that the international community is highly concerned and involved.
In terms of cross -strait conditions, the results of the polls of the Meilimao Electronics News recently showed that 77%of the interviewed people believe that no matter which party is in power in Taiwan, if the government on both sides of the strait can maintain dialogue and negotiation is "benefits greater than the disadvantages";Even the green interviewees are nearly 60 % proportional to support this view.However, since the "1992 Consensus" was included in Xi Five and was defined by Beijing as "the same one of the same Chinese and the same and the unification of the two sides of the strait", the "One Middle School" has no room for "each table", and the "Taiwan future" option has no Taiwan.In the space of public opinion, the vast majority of Taiwanese people cannot accept such a meaning. The so -called "consensus" has lost the value of mutual understanding and the fuzzy strategy.
In addition, the improvement of China's comprehensive national strength and the combat effectiveness of the PLA, Beijing's strong intensity of Taiwan ’s diplomacy, economy and trade, and military pressure has been stronger than in the past. With the popularization of the media of the public, panic spreading is faster.The road to the mind is more difficult.Under this condition, although the transactional communication mechanism of the two sessions is still operating, the recurrence of high -level official talks between the two sessions is indeed difficult.
But because of severe and critical moments, we even realize the importance of reconstruction of mutual trust and dialogue.Chairman Gu Zhenfu, the Haiji Association, pointed out in his memories: "Instead of using the" Consensus "to express the results of the Hong Kong conference in 1992, it is better to use the" UNDERSTANDING) or "ACCORD) to change.Can be close to the facts. "From the perspective of the first person at the historical scene, today people commemorate Wang Gu's talks, and should be remembered that behind this historical facts, the two sides of the strait are willing to understand, understand each other, be willing to echo, echo and echo, andThe spiritual heritage of each other.
The core historical heritage of Hong Kong talks and Wang Gu's talks is to put on hold on high political issues.The "1992 Consensus" and its meaning belong to high political issues, because it involves the positioning of cross -strait political relations and the strategic competition pattern of the United States and China, it is difficult for us to look forward to solving relevant disputes during the short period.Wang Gu's talks about the subsequent intergovernmental dialogue between the two sides of the strait, because the negotiations of high political issues were not involved, the two sessions of the sea base and the Maritime Association could be promoted. The three -way direct flights and economic and trade investment cooperation on both sides of the strait, and then signed the ECFA and 23 agreements.This is the result of hard -won and Lesica's livelihood, and both sides should maintain them together.
More importantly, the foundation of these negotiations, exchanges, dialogues, and negotiations is to establish mutual understanding, recognize the pragmatic principles that exist in political reality and do not deny each other;, Serving the people and society on both sides of the strait, and enhance the basic beliefs and spirituality of the well -being of the people on both sides of the strait.
On the 30th anniversary of Wang Gu's talks, there is no controversy in consensus, grasping the "Guwang spirit" of "willing to understand each other" and "willing to echo each other", or a better way to remember advanced.It is expected that the two parties are willing to take the common goal of accumulating goodwill, mutual trust and communication, and orderly promoting the exchanges between local, the two sessions, the two sessions, and even higher -level officials between the government.Due to lack of dialogue, it misjudge potential risks; replace confrontation with more understanding and tolerance, and use more dialogue and cooperation to fight for regional peaceful development.
