Since the beginning of the spring, the two sides of the strait officially interpret each other's goodwill. In February, Xia Liyan, vice chairman of the Kuomintang of Mainland China, met with Song Tao, the director of the Mainland Government State Council.Person in the middle of the person ".Later, the Democratic Progressive Party also announced that it has always encouraged and supported health and orderly cross -strait exchanges. The mainland "as long as he is willing to respect Taiwan's free and democratic constitutional system, Song Tao is welcome to come to Taiwan at any time."If the official cross -strait officials really follow this path to develop benign interaction, the peaceful relationship framework can be expected.

However, whether this is a dream or an opportunity for Bing Rong, you have to go and watch.At present, the DPP, which is ruling, has more than 50 % of the votes, basically about 40 %. If it is not the mainland policy of Taiwan's policy, can it be separated from the public opinion of Taiwan society?How can it prove that "hope is officially official, and hope to be in Taiwan"?If mainland officials do not review the suppression and rigidity of the past policies, they may be too much due to the policy, which will cause cross -strait confrontation.

The official proposal of the mainland advocates the united front, and the goal is to unite all the objects that can be united; and the DPP, which has transformed through Taiwan independence, has gradually emphasized that the sovereignty of the Republic of China sovereignty independence and Taiwan's independent exposition.Or "use in the Taiwan body" is different from the traditional "legal Taiwan independence".This so -called "substantial independence" is inlaid with each other with "Taiwan's Taiwanization", which is not easy to separate.

Re -examining the changes in cross -strait policies of Li Denghui, Chen Shui -bian and Tsai Ing -wen, almost all of which have undergone "broken changes". The main reasons are to deal with the suppression of Taiwan's policy from the mainland.Miscellane on both sides of the strait.For example, Lee Teng -hui has repeatedly announced a China to formulate a national unified program and set up a national unified committee.

Chen Shui -bian has proposed the four differences, cross -strait integration theory and the future construction of the future."Watching it", in the end, Chen Yi's initiative to fight against Taiwan's name and Taiwan's name.Now Tsai Ing -wen has begun to advocate the status quo. The land party approved the unfinished answer sheet. In the end, Cai proposed that the neighboring countries on the other side and the across strait were not affiliated with each other.

Lee Teng -hui proposes a special relationship with the country and the country, and and Chen Shui -bian's proposal one of the country's theory, which causes the Taiwan Strait to confront the Taiwan Strait.Today, whether Tsai Ing -wen claims that the cross -strait is not affiliated with each other, or the vice president Lai Qingde advocates pragmatic Taiwan independence, Taiwan is not part of China, or the Democratic Progressive Party can locate cross -strait relations with the new two countries, one China, one, and one country.The discussion and cross -strait routes have not really transformed and adjusted, and the deadlock between the two sides of the strait may fall into a vicious circle.

When Taiwan's leaders propose a cross -strait discussion, not only cannot obtain the goodwill response of the land and effectively resolve the deadlock, but is strengthened to strengthen the suppression. Eventually, it adopts more radical discussions for countermeasures, and stimulate cross -strait confrontation.This kind of stimulus response interactive mode of "suppression and countermeasures" has fallen into the path dependence, and urgently needs innovation and open policy thinking to break the deadlock.

If the cross -strait governments can create a similar consensus on the 1992, such as "a family on both sides of the strait", "the same belong to the Chinese nation", "a Chinese", the same text and the same type, etc., become the basis of dialogue, or can become transactional, functional, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionality, functionalityThe foundation of the dialogue of economic issues can also become a customs clearance of local exchanges, the DPP's dialogue and exchanges between the DPP and the Communist Party think tank. With the expansion of social exchanges between cross -strait and reduce hostility and search consensus, it is conducive to establishing a framework for peaceful and stable relations on cross -strait.The recurrence of the project format may be based on the resumption of the direct flight point, and the two parties did not establish a consensus based on the 1992 consensus.

Once the cross -strait high -level political issues are involved in political and military, the 1992 consensus can be regarded as a political basis, such as military mutual trust mechanisms and peace agreements.In other words, the 1992 consensus can be applied to high -level political issues; as for functionality, transactional, and economic issues, the prerequisite for application may be more loose and accepted by both parties.In this way, the cross -strait enters a gradual, healthy, equal, and stable communication before further condensing high -level cross -strait consensus.