Source: Taiwan Industry and Commerce Times
Industrial and Commercial Society
U.S. President Biden led the cabinet members to the two hospitals on February 7 to publish the new year's national information.The Republican Public MPs who listened to it, because of dissatisfaction with many policies, interrupted the speech process from time to time.Sitting on the top right of Biden, the new Republican House Speaker McCarthy, the expressionless limb language is enough to explain everything.Nevertheless, at this moment when the two parties competitive competition, there are still rare scenes that have applauded the audience regardless of the party, and it was when Biden talked about "medical insurance" and "medical subsidies".
First of all, the number of deaths of the crown disease is more than 1.12 million. It is a ironic for the American democratic politics and capitalist society in the United States.Destiny because of "looking down on the disease", the most small ethnic groups (African and Latin) in Metropolitan City, as well as the life and health of the women's ethnic groups.A major warning.
Secondly, the most important significance of Biden this time, in addition to indirect expression of re -election, also tried to seek the largest number of conventions on the issue of political and economic and social issues.Only cross -party medical care policies can make the Republican members of the Republican be applauded.After the epidemic, the medical care policy related to life and health is undoubtedly an important political asset of Biden.
Finally, the two parties have different views on whether the upper limit of US Treasury bonds can be raised in time.In view of the House of Representatives' fundraising, supervision review, and even the final dynamic appropriation of federal government budgets, it has difficulty in replacement. Even if it is president, "in front of money" is also heroic.In other words, adjusting the priority of federal budget may be the prerequisite for resolving political differences between the two parties, and "medical insurance" and "medical subsidies" have become the common language of the two parties in the court.
The budget of the US federal government is divided into "mandator" and "discretionary".The latter can be reduced year by year and can be increased; the former has the payment of interest on national debt, and the so -called "enablement".Among them, the payment of national debt interest is a problem of medium and long term; the expenditure of "should enjoy rights and interests" has an instant political effect.
In order to fight for the support of voters, the two parties are determined to be together; national health and care for the elderly have become the expenditure of "enjoying rights and interests."The two most significant social legislation in American history- "medical insurance" and "medical subsidy" (all formulated in 1965), of which medical insurance belongs to "enjoying rights and interests", for the federal subsidy plan set up for the elderly group,It is enough to cover half of the medical care expenditure for the elderly, which costs nearly $ 600 billion each year; medical subsidies are "social benefits" because they can expand to "affordable medical and health insurance law" without insurance, and they are not insurance.Government, jointly subsidized to poor ethnic groups.
Looking back at 2011, the first batch of infant tide and 78 million ethnic groups after World War II need more and better medical care.Reason for Affordable Care Act.In the past 12 years, this entire generation of ethnic groups have successively become elders over 65 years old.As more and more voters are eligible, coupled with the lack of "public" options, most of them are through the operation of private insurance companies and medical institutions. On the one hand, hospitals and doctors are guaranteed to receive diagnosis and treatment costs, and the other.In terms of legal setting, the upper limit of payment is only a small part of medical insurance expenditure.Therefore, the surge in federal budget expenditures has reached 20%of the US GDP, becoming an unavoidable result, and a historical communities that the two parties must jointly undertake.
In the past, a Jiazi, after different medical care reforms in the United States, also proposed different countermeasures for the Democratic Party and Republican Party.Patients receiving subsidies must be affordable by the government as required by the government. For the diagnosis and treatment costs of hospitals and doctors, the upper limit of the number of hospitals in the hospitalization of patients is controlled to inhibit the abuse of medical resources.Under the medical insurance system, a medical institution of "interest, no public": First, the care cost of care costs is relatively low, care for the end -stage patients, or the elderly care institutions and tranquility institutions.Second, in the state where the Republican party has long -term main administration, the hospital is began to obtain the target hospital through public bidding.
No matter what kind of system design, it involves insurance companies, medical institutions, doctors and nursing staff, patients, and family members; and the increasingly expensive medical commercial insurance costs, and "Before the company does not contract the public,"Some diseases" "will launch more and more American people to introduce the existing medical care system.Therefore, the limited resources of the federal government and the state government are noted in the medical care of the relevant individuals, organizations, and groups of relevant individuals, organizations, and groups.The two parties have obvious differences in government thinking.Guoqing Counseling is just a wind direction ball with policy claims. Political negotiation must be restarted. "Medical Insurance" and "Medical Subsidies" are relatively easy to achieve consensus and mutual benefit.Essence
