Source: Zhongshi News Network
Author: Su Yonglin
Civil balloon in mainland China has entered the United States and was shot down by the US military with missiles. The reason behind it has become a mystery of different opinions.Some people say that this is the expected results of the United States that it is difficult for the United States to get Blingken to visit China and deliberately use a balloon to stir the yellow. Some people say that this is the consensus of the United States and China that cannot reach a key issue.Lower the steps; some people say that this is the confrontation of US -China relations to confrontation and conflict that cannot be reconciled.
No matter how the parties interpret it, at least one thing can be determined, that is, the balloon incident makes the United States and China "small things big"."The big things are fried", which may become the first black swan in 2023.Although the incident has not yet ended, compared to the basic attitudes and treatment methods of the US -Mandan officials, politics, and the people on the issue, including the response of the Cai Government's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, many intriguing details can be found.
First of all, the tone of the issue is the low -key and high -profile Chinese side.Beijing responded to the "regret" of an apology in the first response of the balloon crisis.You know, the first time the United States bombed the Chinese embassy in Yugoslavia, the United States also used this word to respond to the Chinese side, but later changed to "Apologize" under the strong protest and countermeasures in Beijing.When the United States shot down the balloon, Beijing responded in the form of "the Ministry of Foreign Affairs" instead of "a spokesman answer" and adopted the word "force attack".The condemnation language only mentioned that the United States has "violated international practice" and has not risen to infringe sovereignty or violates the level of international law.
In contrast, in the calling Ministry of the U.S. Secretary of State Brosky and Wang Yi, director of the Central Foreign Affairs Office of the Mainland Government, the United States has accused Beijing of "irresponsible behavior" and "violating US sovereignty and international law."At the same time, the US Defense Secretary Austin's statement after shooting down the Chinese balloon also emphasized that the legal operation of the United States showed that President Biden and the Guoan team have always effectively effectively afforded the "Chinese infringement of US sovereignty".It can be seen that on the eve of Brinkin's original visit to China, the balloon crisis ordered the US Congress and right public opinion to ask Brinken to cancel the visit and the tough voices of China completely broke out.The Chinese balloon fell to the scope of the airspace and then shot down, obviously it was seized.
From this inference, the call between Brinken and Wang Yi should be the decision to tell the Chinese side in advance in advance, which also gives birth to the so -called "US excessive reaction" in the subsequent statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense in the Beijing Ministry of Foreign AffairsTune.In other words, rather than a witness to this balloon is the United States and China ’s evil and even the century confrontation, it is better to say that this balloon confirms that the highest -level crisis communication pipeline of the United States and China is still unblocked, and it is not impossible for both sides to construct a" guardrail ".If compared with the US House of Representatives McCarthy's "No Plan to visit Taiwan", it can also be seen that the Bayeng government intervenes.
Just as the Taiwan Strait crisis after Perosi visited Taiwan last August last year, the "balloon crisis" still needed at least two months to digest. I believe that the time for the Dialogue of Blingken to visit China and the US -China Finance and Economics high -level dialogue will be postponed to 3.After the Two of the Council of the month.At this time, if the Cai government can show stable cross -strait words and deeds, it is expected to alleviate regional tensions.Interestingly, this statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs rarely changed back to the "Mainland Government Government" used by the Kuomintang period, instead of the "Chinese government" that means "one middle and one" that means "one middle and one".Is there a sound outside the string?It depends on the next performance of the Cai government.
