Source: Ming Pao
Ming Pao Society Review
The Chief Executive Li Jiachao responded to reviewing the anti -epidemic initiative and agreed to summarize the experience, but did not agree to set up an independent investigation committee.Each government may face major public health incidents. The crown disease epidemic will not be the last new type of popular virus explosion in Hong Kong. Of course, it is also a review.This is two different things to look back at the overall review from a higher and wider perspective, and it is two different things, and the levels are completely different.From the beginning of the virus testing and trace of virus in the early stages of resistance, to the outbreak of the fifth wave of epidemic, the cause and consequences of the cause of the hospital, and the division of public and private medical systems, etc., many problems are worthy of in -depth review.The good governance needs to be public and transparent, and the anti -epidemic is different. The most important way is to open up the public and leave a detailed report.A number of government expert consultants support independent reviews, and the government should be good.
Wars review as a strain
Review after the war as the future
Yuan Guoyong, a government expert consultant Yuan Guoyong earlier to imitate the practice of SARS in 2003, set up a committee to review the gains and losses of anti -epidemic experience, and prepare for the extensive outbreak of epidemics in the future.The proposal is supported by the consultant of at least 5 government experts. Kong Fan is described as a member of Kong Fan, who can prevent members of the Science of Diseases. Review is necessary. Especially in the winter, Hong Kong will face crown diseases and influenza clamps.External service service can be seen in the next winter; Liu Zexing, another government expert consultant and dean of the University of Hong Kong Medical College, also believes that Hong Kong needs to independently review the crown disease epidemic, including good or bad places, specific methods, specific methods.And covering the range and can be discussed from long.
Li Jiachao took the initiative to mention the problem of resistance to the epidemic, and agreed to summarize the experience in order to effectively respond to different threats in the future.The epidemic has been raging for 3 years, and the local governments have handled the epidemic according to their own actual situation. There is no recognized optimal or standard plan. Compared with some European and American countries, Hong Kong's anti -epidemic results are good.The deployment and promotion of the economic development of Hong Kong are the two goals of the government now. One words are "looking forward"; 3. After the current government takes office, it has continuously summarized anti -epidemic experience and improvement measures, such as establishing a new command architecture.All departments have also incorporated a useful plan into the constantization of guidelines. In short, the summary of experience has been done, and there is no need to review independently. 4. The epidemic is unpredictable.It is necessary to be fast, implement, and implement the results. "
The strategy of responding to the crown disease in various places is different. Excessive simplified cross -ground is not suitable. It does not mean that it cannot refer to the lens. More importantly, every place should reflect on its own anti -epidemic experience, summarize gains and losses, seek self -progress, comprehensively comprehensivelyThe in -depth "post -match review" is to look forward and hope that the future will be better.In Hong Kong for more than 3 years, after experiencing different stages, in the face of too many major battles, there will always be some new problems in each battle. Officials need to continuously review and revise "tactics", rectify command and combat systems.The "continuous review" in this kind of war aims to deal with the situation of the battlefield, only fight for the day and night, and "review" after the war. Looking at the overall situation, it is actually two different things. The former cannot replace the latter, and the two should not be confused.
Officials in war are often things.The War of Resistance Against the Epidemia moved to the end, and an independent review investigation was launched. The purpose was to stand in a higher and wider position to look back at the overall situation from a more calm and sober perspective.Anti -epidemic is like marching, fast decision -making, and accurate implementation, which is a problem at the strain level. However, summing up anti -epidemic experience should not only stop there.Anti -epidemic decision -making is not only fast, but also accurate.Looking back at the entire war of resistance, decision -making is not in place, it is not uncommon; bureaucratic machines are stuck everywhere, and logistical support is insufficient. It is also quite common. After the game, the biggest purpose of reviewing is not to turn over the old account for a department or an official, but to find it, but to find it, but to find it, but to find it, but to find it, but to find it, but to find it, it is to find it, but to find it, but to find it, but to find it, but to find it, but to find it, you can find it.Why are these problems, whether there are some structural factors or blind spots in it, how to avoid repeating the same mistakes in the future.
The fifth wave of the epidemic exploded early last year. In just a few months, nearly 10,000 people died.The situation is shocking.After nearly a year, the public still has a lot of questions.Omicron virus first appeared in November 2021. The WHO quickly pointed out that the virus strain was very spread. The Hong Kong government also emphasized that there was closely follow -up prevention.The epidemic is heer, the citizens lack support, and the hotline seems to be unable to get through. The government is caught off guard. Where is the problem?A large number of elderly people died in the hospital. What experience and lessons are worthy of summary and leave it to future generations?When the public medical system is not the load, how should the private medical system provide more support?I believe many people want independent reviews to provide some revelation and answers.
Review the more transparent, the better the better
Reserve records in written reports
The fifth wave of epidemic is the most chaotic period, and it is necessary to review the place after the game.In addition, during the entire war of resistance, the changes in virus testing, case tracking, and rigid needle to external defense input policy, many places are worthy of review.The epidemic had won the lives of 10,000 people this time, far more than 299 people when SARS. At that time, the SAR government was willing to investigate independently. There was no reason to do it now.The more open and transparent and better the anti -epidemic review. If the government believes that the Legislative Council has set up an independent investigation committee to call witnesses by a near -class court hearing. It is not a suitable practice.Officials can invite prestigious people, leaders of the independent review committee, to find experts and partners of all parties and partners on some anti -epidemic issues, provide opinions at the time, provide improving opinions, and publicize the results of the review.The obedience allows the public to know more about this war resistance.
