Education topic

The latest version of the artificial intelligence chat program ChatGPT was launched at the end of November last year, and immediately became the topic of the city of global netizens. The number of registered users exceeded one million within five days.Many users can "chat" with the text with ChatGPT3 for one or two hours. It seems that the other party is a real person who knows dozens of languages and can "talk about the inner uterus from outer space to the inner uterus".

The intelligent text generation technology behind ChatGPT3 has been for many years. Recently, there has been a technological leap, and because some programs are open to Internet users to try it, users are surprised that they seem to be wise and boundless, and may even threaten human existing work, study, life, life, life, lifeThe form, so it "goes to each other" on the Internet and has a high popularity.

One of the fields of "goosebumps" is the education community.Is the popularization of such text -generation systems that will promote the cheating of students?In particular, these systems seem to surpass the "traditional" search engine (can only list related websites according to keywords), and advance to students who need to write chapter operations or computer programs to "catch knives"?There is a school in the United States who quickly released the first shot, which explicitly banned students from using ChatGPT3; however, another primary school sent an email to introduce the ChatGPT3 to the parents of the students, asking everyone to look at it positively and how to make good use of it.

Why not jump out of the perspective of "blessing or scourge" for students. Talk about what changes can it bring to the teacher?

Yes, ChatGPT3 can actually become a little assistant for teachers!For example, teachers can invite ChatGPT3 "Curriculum Outline of the secondary equations of math courses in middle schools", "designing primary school science courses related to the factors that affect moisture evaporation rate", "formulate computer room student rules", "out of the five -way choice questions about Singapore history"The three -way open issue" and "the scoring standard for planning portraits for art classes." It all "mission must be reached", but teachers cannot collect them in the order.

First of all, it is better to believe that the text content generated by ChatGPT3 is not as high as the accuracy.For example, the choice of Singapore history from ChatGPT3 has not accurate wording, such as: "Which country is the city in Singapore?" The word "Zeng" is barely acceptable."What year is Singapore and Malaysia?" The options include 1963, 1965, 1967, 1969.We know that Malaysia was "established" in 1963, and Singapore was separated from British colonial rule by joining Malaysia; Singapore itself was independent in 1965.Ask the question like this, I don't know which answer should I choose.

Teachers should ask the question right

More importantly, teachers need to ask ChatGPT3 to help, and they must ask questions, higher -level questions, and favorable conditions.For example, there are theories of various factions behind language teaching.Please ChatGPT3 "Design Studentist Trust Plan", "Design Cognitive Oral Class Teaching Plan", "Design Classification of Oral Lesson Lesson Lesson Plan Guarded by a Traffic Language Learning Mode";The learning tasks are all around the scene.But those who are familiar with these theories or models can see their differences -behavioralism advocates students to recite and practice words, and open their mouths to "back" when dialogue;Selling; communication model emphasizes that students invest in real life context such as asking for roads and ordering, and students can correct and improve after completing the conversation.

Therefore, teachers must clearly know the appropriate teaching roads. Ask the right question, ChatGPT3 can generate more applicable teaching materials or lifting points.In fact, contemporary two -character teaching experts respect for communication and cognitiveism, and behavioralism teaching should only be used occasionally.If the teacher only requires "designing a speaking lesson lesson", there is no condition, and ChatGPT3 will "decide" how to "掰" lesson plan.

Link back to the perspective of student perspectives, and contemporary educators have repeatedly reminded that a key skill of the 21st century learners is to "ask questions" -the importance even surpass "answers".Before this century, textbooks and teachers played the role of knowledge authority on the learning path of students; now this is no longer a matter of course, because students have more learning channels, such as using the Internet, the answers can be found between their fingers.But the key is that they have to choose the "right" keyword combination to find more correlated and higher quality reference content.Similarly, ask teachers, experts, or ChatGPT3 questions that if you want to ask questions about high quality, you can get high -quality answers.For example, assuming that there is a primary school arranging students to visit the butterfly garden. There is a Google search before a student's trip to learn about the relevant knowledge of personal interest. Three of them searched: "Who found the butterfly?" "How many colors are there in butterflies?""What is the life cycle of butterflies?" If these three issues reflect the learning goals of individual students, who do you say who will preview before the trip and can learn the most in the visit?

Chatgpt3's Yu is flawed, but the possibility of opening new learning tasks.For middle schools and college students, mentors can use ChatGPT3 to generate chapters related to curriculum content to students, ask them to write reply / comment, or search the Internet to search for their information or opinion sources and identify authenticity ("letter (interest)" than three)──This helps to improve information literacy.Or you can specify a big theme, ask students to ask questions to ChatGPT3, and then compare which ChatGPT3 answers to the most in place, and cultivate students' ability to ask questions -this is with "learning fishing" (relative to "waiting for being fed fish")Related.

and ChatGPT3, which is the most criticized "can write a chapter -type operation", from another perspective, do all the homework start from scratch?Even when designing courses, teaching plans, student conservation, test questions, etc., teachers can refer to a large number of existing materials or samples developed by colleagues or online -now testing the actual conditions of teacher analysis and based on the actual conditions of student background, resource limitations, and other actual conditions, Screening, integration, modification, and adjusting the ability of these teaching tools.Similarly, for students, ChatGPT3 can help them, give them the homework, and let them focus on cultivating skills that can not do or do not do well.

Of course, there are still students who must start from scratch, such as learning reflection on text, composition of Chinese lessons, computer programs, etc.Ask ChatGPT3: "Please draw out the codes that prohibit students from using the ChatGPT3 cheating", it really lists 10 codes (although there are two repeats, the other two have nothing to do with ChatGPT3), including "clearly notify students to ban ChatGPT3, and if they are exposed, they are revealedThe consequences "" use multiple evaluation methods, such as adding verbal reports, questions from teachers and students, and peer mutual evaluation ".

A thick and trap shoulder

Another professor's proposal that if it is necessary to show the integration or review of the group of literature, students must indicate the source of all opinions or information (the current ChatGPT3 cannot be done).Teachers themselves must learn to read the text as soon as they read the article, because the "machine text" is close to perfect, but the words, grammar, and articles structure are rigid. As long as they are doubt, they will use ChatGPT3 to generate related articles.Compare with students, how similar it is.At present, some computer scholars have developed special detection articles for artificial intelligence.

The advent of

ChatGPT3 seems to challenge the essence, purpose, and methods of education and learning that we have considered for granted in the past.Let's not use it in a hurry, and we should not block it immediately; but we should continue to exploreTo understand the value of the positive and negative sides of it, gradually explore the strategies and design that can except for the disadvantages and disadvantages.

The definition of wisdom in the 21st century is to know how to stand on the shoulders of others.Chatgpt3 may be a thick, but there is a trap shoulder, which is blindly copied, for fear that it will step on the air and fall.To make good use of it from a speculative perspective, it can alleviate the burden on operating low -level lessons or learning tasks, and focuses on the exercise of high -level thinking and skills.

The author Huang Longxiang is the National School of Education, Nanyang University of Technology

Senior Education Research Scientist

Luci Jie is a professor at the college

The advent of

ChatGPT3 seems to challenge the essence, purpose, and methods of education and learning that we have considered for granted in the past.We should not use it in a hurry, and we should not block it immediately; but we should continue to explore and understand the value of its positive and negative sides, and gradually explore strategies and design that can except for disadvantages and disadvantages.