Source: Hong Kong 01

"Hong Kong 01" theory

Hong Kong Chief Executive Li Jiachao went to Beijing for his first time after taking office. President Xi Jinping said that he resolutely maintain national security, vigorously restore economic vitality, and actively respond to public concern.Premier Li Keqiang of the State Council also showed the work of "fully affirming" Li Jiachao and the SAR Government.It is certainly unknown to the outside world when you close the door, but if you don't talk about the work of maintaining national security, it is unlikely.Less than a month ago, the central government sent a letter to Li Jiachao, asking him to report the work of maintaining national security since the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law, and there are attachments to indicate matters.

As the dual head of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the SAR Government, the Chief Executive is responsible for the dual responsibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Central Government. These two "dual" form the foundation for the Chief Executive to the President of the State Council and the Prime Minister of the State Council.After the National Security Law came into effect, the Chief Executive had more Hong Kong maintenance of the chairman of the National Security Council.Li Jiachao issued a statement issued by the central government's official letter, which was made as the Chief Executive and the Chairman of the National Security Commission.Article 11 of the National Security Law also states that the chief executive should be responsible for maintaining national security affairs to the central government.Obviously, every position of the Chief Executive is accompanied by a accountability. The subordinate relationship between the central government and the SAR, the national leader and the chief executive is in an orderly manner.

The Chief Executive of the State Security Commission's Chief Executive Loan

In fact, according to the constitutional order of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the chairman of the National Security Commission has no choice but not the chief executive.As the head of the SAR, the Chief Executive has already shouldered the duties of maintaining national security.Under the administrative -led system, he also has great power, just as the Court of Final Appeal confirmed that the chief executive had a wide and flexible legislative power in the judicial review of the Emergency Law to quickly and fully cope with the emergency or harmful public security.In the past, the Chief Executive lacked a service unit responsible for maintaining national security.Free of the challenge of judicial review.The Chief Executive has both responsibilities and power.

However, the central government asked the chief executive to report the national security affairs this time, and it was announced on the eve of whether the lawyer applied for the lawyer of Li Zhiying's external lawyer in the Final Audit Court.EssenceIf overseas lawyers are hired in cases involving the National Security Law, it may constitute the risk of endangering national security. Why is the law of law in the High Court that has always agreed with the original approval criteria.When applying for an appeal to the Court of Final Appeal, although the Department of Justice pointed out that the original criteria should not be applied to cases involving the National Security Law, it is just as the verdict refers that there is neither substantial support nor the specific clarification of the new standards.The Chief Executive is not only the superior of the Division of the Department of Justice in the government structure, but also has the relationship between the chairman and the members of the Director of the Director of the State Security Commission.

blame responsibilities on the SAR courts.What Liang Aishi, Chen Hongyi, and Lie Xianlun said, do not repeat them here.The Court of Appeal of the Final Appeal stated in the judgment that "when the consideration related to national security is proposed in a conventional approach in the application application, of course, it is of course the most important consideration."It can be expected that even if the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress does not make an interpretation, if the national security case will apply for overseas lawyers in the future, the court will definitely be approved strictly, and national security is mainly considered.Now Li Zhiying's application wood has become a boat. It is best to respect the judicial procedure, but even if the Chief Executive believes that he has to be a last resort, he can start from entry control and consider the cancellation of the visa of the designated person.Not only the director of the Immigration Department is a member of the State Party Committee, the entry regulations have also given the Chief Executive Export the power of the "unpopular immigrants" to go out of the country, not to mention that the decision made by the National Security Commission is not judged by judicial review.

"Everyone has a central affairs" and also use good tools

Remember that when the Chief Executive was an exclusive interview with Hong Kong earlier, he mentioned that he had many tools in the toolbox of his land problem.In terms of maintaining national security, isn't his toolbox also have a lot of tools?It cannot be denied. It is recommended that the Central Government's Planning of the Standing Committee of the People's Congress is a tool, but this is not the only tool, and it can even be said that it is a responsible manifestation. It is self -evident.For example, in February, the fifth wave of epidemic in Hong Kong broke out. After Xi Jinping issued the instructions of "three everything and two guarantees", the manpower and material resources of the Central Central Affairs of the Central Committee came to Hong Kong.This is the same time, it is a charcoal in the snow.However, if we can do a good job of epidemic prevention and make good use of the public and private medical system, we can avoid the outbreak from the beginning, and the mainland will not need to help Hong Kong to resist epidemic.In March, the China United Nations Office even sent two anti -epidemic teams to "directly insert a line and understand the truth". Isn't it also the side reflects the main responsibility of the SAR government that has not fully fulfilled the resistance?

The establishment faction often describes the central government with the "general pocket".This is not wrong, but it is by no means a responsible manifestation, nor the meaning of "one country, two systems".On the contrary, this is the same as the previous mentality of "rivers who do not commit well in well water" and Lugang distinguished. It is a negative "one country, two systems".Its negative is that he has the mentality of "all events and the central government", and has not actively done a good job of "Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong" and "highly autonomous".The parents are the most understanding that although they are the biggest support and strongest backing of their children, they never want their children to rely too much and become an Adou.In today's popular words, there is a "giant baby" or "Mom Bao".

What is the right to use the central government from the white paper to the fourth middle school?

The death of President Jiang Zemin last month, some people miss his relative attitude towards Hong Kong.In fact, that is not to let go, but trust, it is Dong Jianhua's relatively positive policy policy, which makes the central government feel relieved.From the same perspective, the Central Government will promulgate the practice white paper of the "one country, two systems" in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in 2014, pointing out that the Chief Executive "is the first responsible person in Hong Kong's implementation of the" one country, two systems' policies and the basic law ", and supports the Chief Executive's" centralized energy to develop the economy to develop the economy.It is not satisfied that the central government is increasingly uneasy about the Chief Executive's life and the achievements of the people's livelihood for the Central Government.

By 2019, the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee of the Mainland Government passed a decision, saying that it was necessary to improve the central government's "exercise of the constitution and the power given by the basic law in accordance with the law."In the past 25 years, the white paper from the "one country, two systems" to the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee has focused on the issue of how much power to exercise the central government on the central government, and has made the same mistake.Regardless of whether it is the theory of "the central government", or regarding the central government as the "one country, two systems" destroyers, the central government has ignored the background of the central government's participation in Hong Kong affairs.Who can exercise power is the problem of Western politics, and why it is necessary to exercise power is the concern of Chinese governance.Without looking at the latter, only ask the former, no one can understand the thinking of the central government.

In terms of the Hong Kong National Security Law, Article 7 states that Hong Kong should complete the "maintenance of national security legislation and improve relevant laws stipulated in the Basic Law" as soon as possible. "The National Security Law is not only to mess up the "one country, two systems", but even strictly speaking, it is not only because of the so -called "black storms" in 2019, but the responsibility of the SAR government has not yet fulfilled national security legislation.If Hong Kong has already developed a sound national security law, even if the society has a large -scale riots, the Hong Kong government has sufficient ability to deal with it.

The central government has the right to formulate the National Security Law for the Hong Kong, but this was originally a constitutional responsibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; the Hong Kong National Security Law established the Central Committee of the Central Committee in Hong Kong, but the Hong Kong National Security Commission is "the main responsibility for maintaining national security."The Chief Executive is "responsible to the Central People's Government"; although the central government is located in the Hong Kong Liaison Office in Hong Kong, it can undertake various matters assigned by the Central People's Government.It is not the responsible person in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is directly under the Central Government and does not belong to any other unit or institution;High -degree autonomy and the maintenance of Guoan are responsible for the Chief Executive to the Central Committee to report and report to the leaders.

Deng Xiaoping, who set the policy of "Hong Kong people to govern Hong Kong" and "highly autonomous", once said that "believes that Hong Kong people can manage Hong Kong well."Li Jiachao, who shows the new weather of the "Patriotic Governance of Hong Kong", should not make Deng Xiaoping's trust failure in the new era and the new journey in the new era and the new journey.