Author: Yang Zongxin
Facing the frequent disturbances of the main aircraft, Tsai Ing -wen announced that the led by the air should not be tolerated by others.However, in fact, the central line of the Taiwan Military Machinery has not led the air in Taiwan, nor is it the air defense identification area, but the long -term tacit understanding formed on both sides of the strait.
As for this tacit understanding, whether it can be regarded as an international practice depends on the same behavior of actively exercising the same behavior and subjectively.It takes at least decades of practice for the formation of practice, and at least in 1968, there are still records of sending black cat squadron to the mainland inland reconnaissance.It will not agree that the central line of the Strait is an international practice.From this point of view, the mainland has recently said that there is no strait midline, which is completely traceable.
In the past, the mainland was willing to take the middle line as the boundary. It can only be said that it is based on a certain trust. Although the two sides of the strait are divided into division, both sides agree with the principles of the first China.Nowadays, the mutual trust foundation of the 1992 consensus has been lost, and the situation of time and space has changed. It is difficult for Taiwan to have a position to continue to ask Lu to adhere to the habit of the past.If you want to solve the problem of provocations of maintenance of main military aircraft, you cannot use the strait midline that is neither international convention, reality, and difficulty, but to find solutions from international law.
According to the Convention on the United Nations Marine Law, the aircraft has the right to fly over the Gonghai, the exclusive economic zone, and the continental shelf, but it does not define the connotation of flying over.However, in 2001, the military aircraft crashing in China and the United States, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the mainland stated that all countries enjoyed freedom of flying over in the exclusive economic zone of a country.However, hellip; U.S. military reconnaissance planes on the coast of China have already exceeded the scope of flying over China, abuse and violate the principle of freedom of flying.It can be seen that the mainland believes that flying is not for transportation, it is abuse.
This kind of thinking is brought out in order to prevent the United States from investigating the name of freedom and searches in order to avoid the name of the United States.From the same logical perspective, when the PLA is flying to Taiwan's exclusive economic zone (land officials do not recognize, but at least the fishermen on the other side still use the midline as the activity line), from time to time, they deviate from the normal channel, and even the mainland media bluntly claims that the purpose of the around Taiwan is for the purpose of the purpose of around the Taiwan to be for the purpose of the purpose of around the Taiwan.A scary Taiwan independence is not a simple transportation.
If Taiwan can seize this, entering will force maintenance of military aircraft to face the appropriateness of disturbing Taiwan, and retirement can win the support of international public opinion.
