Source: United Daily

The brutal aunt Liang was sentenced to life imprisonment in the first instance.There are two focus on the outside world: First, the man surnamed Liang had no history of mental illness. It was killing and killing the consciousness caused by drug abuse. Is this in line with the criminal reduction conditions of criminal law?Second, the judge blamed the man to pay the Taoyuan Health Bureau, and said that if he disappeared the next day, it would not be possible to throw the problem to the society?

At the end of April, the railway police case was sentenced to innocence due to the disorders suffering from Silicon, which also triggered social inexperience.The suspect of the aunt's case was a record of seeking a medical treatment. The judge lost his ability to identify his ability to identify because of drug use, that is, he was not guilty to be released in court, and he did not make mandatory medical sanctions.Such identification and processing, in addition to hasty, are more contradictory. How can the judge guarantee that he will not commit it again?

From the mental disorders of mental patients to the ability of drug addicts, the behavior of the person and effect of the person in charge is very different.Unfortunately, the judge in this case actually waited for the two casually, which was a serious fallacy; no wonder, the Minister of Justice Cai Qingxiang was worried that the judgment would release the wrong message.Many people leave a message to comment: Can they be confession after drinking and taking drugs?

In April of this year, Wang Jingyu, a murderer of the little bulb murder, was finally sentenced to life imprisonment. He escaped and died, which also caused public opinion.Wang Jingyu suffered from mental illness for a long time, and often had hallucinations. However, the judge did not sign a sentence on the grounds that he had no significant reduction in his ability to identify when he committed the crime. In contrast, Liang suspected of the fierce mother after taking drugs was removed.The judgment standard is so chaotic, how can the judiciary convince people?