Author: Shi Weiquan
Source: Zhongshi Electronics News
Following the arrest of Li Zhiying, it does not mean to agree with the Apple Daily; opposing the National Security Law of Hong Kong is not the same as pro -beauty; opposing the Taiwan National Security Law is not equal to pro -China.The freedom of speech should be surpassed beyond the national borders, and it has nothing to do with pro -American or pro -China. Unfortunately, the political position has blinded many public opinion of Taiwan.Zhu Lilun followed the Hong Kong National Security Law, and the deep blue person scolded him to express his statement to the United States.
Even more sad, the national machine is named for national security, expands administrative tailoring, restricts freedom, and occurs in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Many Taiwanese media have condemned the Hong Kong National Security Law, but they do not criticize the DPP government's defense democracy.People should not be a slave in Beijing, but they are willing to be the slaves of the DPP.
The focus of freedom of speech is not to protect our ideological freedom, but to protect the freedom of ideas that we don't like, including advocating the freedom of one country, two systems and unity.The Democratic Progressive Party advocates defensive democracy, indicating that in order to defend democracy, they can use means to restrict democracy and suppress their dislikes.Taiwanese media people and academia do not dare to disassemble this logic that is not deceiving, because populism is terrible and they are not brave enough.
Look at the reverse osmosis method launched by the Democratic Progressive Party to the Hong Kong National Security Law. Both are based on national security to prevent overseas forces.If the first text of the two laws is swapped, it will not have a sense of disobedience.
The Hong Kong National Security Law prohibit the division of the country's claims and remarks. Even if there is no use of force or threatened by force, even if it is criminal; after Taiwan ’s five laws in the National Security, the same is true. Political objections are sufficient to be convicted.If the Taiwanese attended the symposium of one country, two systems in mainland China, or cooperating with the mainland units to publish a statement of one country, two systems in Taiwan, have become a preparation or conspiracy offenders in violation of the crime of external affords.If the retired general pays tribute to the national anthem and flag of the mainland, although it is not a martial arts act, there will be sin.
Similarly, not there.The MAC issued a statement to criticize the implementation rules of the Hong Kong National Security Law and define the dullness.effect.However, the words of the MAC can be used to criticize Taiwan's reverse osmosis law. Among them, the regulations of various organizations or dispatched people who are substantially controlled by overseas hostile forces can also cause the cicada effect.
For example, does the Cross -Strait Marriage and Family Service Center on the Straits of the Mainland be sources?The Malaysian government started the reform of the rights and interests of the land distribution. The mainland authorities followed and also cared about cross -strait marriage. In 2012, the agency was established. There are more and more cross -strait marriage partners who choose to settle in the mainland. This agency has helped a lot to the rights and interests of cross -strait partners.According to the reverse osmosis method, Taiwan's administrative organs can position it as the source of penetration.
Similar circumstances, there is also a national friendly association of Taiwan compatriots in the country. According to the regulations of the mainland, the Taiwan Enterprise Federation is supervised and guided by the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council and the Ministry of Civil Affairs.According to the anti -penetration method, the Taiwan administrative organs have the right to treat it as a source of infiltration. However, in order to appease the panic of millions of businessmen, the MAC has publicly stated that the reverse osmosis method will not affect the rights and interests of Taiwanese businessmen and Taiwanese businessmen.
The MAC's states are showing the problems of national security laws such as reverse osmosis.Is it the source of penetration?Does it violate Guoan?The administrative system has the right to tailor, and the final say.When the Cai government wants to fight for your votes, it is said that you are not the source of penetration, but when the government can turn his face up like a book, you can accuse you of passing by when you don't like you.Just as during the martial arts period of Taiwan, the Kuomintang government said that martial law only quit 3%, which does not affect the lives of Periodics. The question is, which is 3%?Will 3%become 30%?Power is controlled in the hands of the party state, and the people can only surrender in the face of intimidation.
The Beijing government is also properlyization of the Hong Kong National Security Law for the same reason.Beijing said that as early as 2009, Macau has passed the maintenance of the National Security Law in 2009 and has never been used for more than ten years. Therefore, Hong Kong people who abide by the law do not need to fear the Hong Kong National Security Law.However, Li Zhiying's case proves that it is not used by Beijing's political considerations, not the principle of rule of law.Beijing's methods, like the national security law of the DPP government, retain the power of turning their faces at any time.
The National Security Law of Hong Kong, the National Security Five Law and Reverse Fasting Method of Taiwan are the spells that are tightened. In the Journey to the West, the Guanyin Bodhisattva passed on the mantra to the Tang monk.Tight, headache, the more painful the struggle.Tang Seng said that he usually wore a tightly wore, and his actions were as usual.However, if you are obedient, Tang Seng said.Hong Kong monkeys and Taiwanese monkeys want to resist. Only the judicial checks and balances of the two places. At this moment, the administrative power of the two places has gradually eroded judicial independence. Public opinion is responsible for strong exposure. The Apple Daily's encounter in Hong Kong.
