Recently, the Democratic Progressive Party's government has repeatedly changed the DPRK's issue on the issue of Lu Sheng's return to Taiwan and the issue of Lu Guanzi to return to Taiwan.With the surge in the anti -midline, the anti -unilateral operation of the DPP has become more obvious; at the same time, it also highlights the lack of coordination of government policies and the flow of decision -making process.The official document of Lu Sheng returned to Taiwan to study two changes a day, and Lu Gaozi returned to Taiwan to announce three changes a day. Cross -strait policy instability and retaliation countermeasures were also affected by foreign authorities' diplomatic suppression and military threats, cross -strait dialogue.The interrupted stimulus, return to the teeth.
The DPP authorities did not recognize the 1992 consensus, and the mainland authorities turned their Taiwan policy to hard, harder, softer and softer strategies. Especially in the hard part, diplomatic suppression was constantly suspended.The Republic of China has been changed to the office of Taipei name, and Taiwan cannot participate in the World Health Organization, International Civil Aviation Organization and International Interpol Organization Conference.Dialogue and negotiations with the Maritime Association, the Taiwan Affairs Office of the National Taiwan Affairs Office and the MAC regularly met, and suspended the freedom of Luke and Lu Sheng to go to Taiwan to study.
Mainland authorities actively promote unidirectional cross -strait exchanges and cooperation, suppressing Taiwan with Huai Rou, stimulating the DPP government to adopt unilateral one -sided means of countermeasures, especially the Five Laws of the National Security and the formulation of reverse osmosis laws, standardized and restricted cross -strait exchanges, edges, edgesThe Kuomintang cross -strait route and the right to speak.
First of all, the Democratic Progressive Party proposed a friendly land -raising policy during the opposition party.The DPP government advocated the policy environment of friendly Lu Sheng and Luci at the 2014 Huashan Conference, and it was advertised as a model for human rights.However, after governing, the policy of studying and returning to Taiwan for the specific landing and returning to Taiwan has taken restrictive measures.
On June 17th, the Ministry of Education of Taiwan announced that the opening of overseas students will return to Taiwan to resume classes, but mainland students are not on the first batch of open entry lists.On August 5th, it was also announced that all overseas academic degrees were born in Taiwan, but it did not include Lu Sheng.This will inevitably give the outside world a social cognition of discrimination.
In particular, the effectiveness of the epidemic control of the mainland has been internationally affirmed. The opening of other countries and not opening the mainland will intensify the rise of nationalism in the mainland and can easily cause mainland society to expand from anti -Taiwan independence to anti -Taiwan.However, the reason why the MAC proposed to suspend the return of Lu Sheng to study in Taiwan to study in Taiwan is that there have been many cases that have recently obstructed Lu Sheng to return to Taiwan.This policy that excludes land to be abroad also declares that the mainland has set up political obstacles. As for when it is open, it is necessary to study the words carefully, so as to deepen the obsession and opposition between the two sides of the strait.
Secondly, it is restricted that Lu Sheng returns to Taiwan at a degree from his degree, and it means retaliated measures with teeth to return teeth.On April 9th, the person in charge of the Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan Office of the Ministry of Education of the Ministry of Education stated that after considering the current crown disease epidemic prevention and control and cross -strait relations, it was decided to suspend graduates from various levels of academic qualifications across the mainland to Taiwan to promote the work;(University) Lu Sheng, who is studying and is willing to continue to be promoted in Taiwan, can continue to be promoted in Taiwan in accordance with the principle of voluntary.At the same time, it is declared that it is necessary to solve the problem of being blocked by Lu Sheng's return to Taiwan universities and effectively safeguarding their legitimate rights and interests.
The mainland authorities suspended Lu Sheng's policy of coming to Taiwan, which can be said to follow the continuation of Luke's free travel measures in August 2019.It not only shows that the DPP authorities do not recognize the punishment of the 1992 consensus, but also highlight the re -election of President Tsai Ing -wen, and Taiwan society is filled with anti -Chinese political atmosphere.
Furthermore, the adjustment of terrestrial and land -matching policies often turns straight down, indicating that the coordination of the Taiwan government's cross -departmental coordination needs to be improved.The Democratic Progressive Party's policy of returning to Taiwan for the return of Luci has changed three times a day. First, based on family gatherings and humanitarian considerations, it was announced on February 11 that the Chinese people who held long -term residence permits or had long -term visiting relatives and children in mainland China were allowed to enter the country.However, because of the opposition of netizens, it was announced that only the two conditions of unattended care in China were able to enter the country, and it was necessary to apply for a project;However, Chen Shizhong, the director of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of the Central Epidemic Prevention Command Center, announced that everything was canceled.
This change in government policy not only shows the lack of horizontal connection between the Taiwan government's cross -departmental meeting, but also has its ability and the interests of the department.Political consequences.Several Pan -Blue Political Party calls on the DPP government to consider the right to reunite with international conventions such as the Convention on the Convention on Children's Rights of Human Rights. Under adult children who are born and have not owned by the nationality of the Republic of China should be allowed to return to Taiwan to return to Taiwan and their parentsReunion.
Finally, the DPP government has been criticized by the Different Differences of the mainland ethnic groups. It has been criticized by the Pan -Blue Political Alliance as the anti -human rights of human rights and caused the dislike of the immigrant ethnic group.The ethnic group does not necessarily agree with the DPP government's policy.
If you have a reasonable factors to restrict the children of Luci in Taiwan because of the early prevention of epidemic prevention; when the epidemic slows down, other foreign spouse children are not limited.Humanitarian care.Differences on land distribution and their children may trigger the pressure of new immigrants to accumulate rebounds against the DPP government; lack of fair treatment and discriminatory policies, and anti -strengthening the original recognition of the Pan -Blue Party.
The Democratic Progressive Party authorities are open, equally, and no differential treatment measures for the Lu Shenglu policy, which can be determined at all; if the mainland authorities take restricted measures, it is also limited.The right to learn the right to learn and return to Taiwan, so that Lu Sheng and Lu Mao became reduced to those who were damaged by the cross -strait authorities to suppress and counter -effort.
In the past, the Kuomintang ruling proposed the Chinese Communist Party's non -China distinction method to adopt the principle of separation of land policies: the CCP regime was severe and released goodwill to the mainland people.However, the national security decision -making under the DPP's ruling does not work, not only to strengthen the tough attitude and position of the CCP regime, but also take severe policies and measures to the people of the mainland.
Regardless of humanitarian principles, universal values, shaping the image of human rights, or from long -term national strategic development and needs, if you want to construct cross -strait civil society dialogue and alliances, such rigid national security decisions should be adjusted as soon as possible.Even though the Trump administration's strategy of China, despite the crosses of the CCP regime, the mainland people have adopted a relatively friendly attitude towards the people of the mainland.If the DPP government does not distinguish the Chinese Communist regime and the people of the mainland, and at the same time, it takes tough means. In fact, it lacks strategic cutting -edge deployment thinking and cannot establish a mainland civic society of Youtai.
The author is Taiwan Foguang University
Assistant professor of the Department of Public Affairs
The DPP government has been criticized by the Different Differences of the mainland ethnic groups and has been criticized by the Pan Blue Political Alliance as the anti -human rights of human rights and caused the dislike of the immigrant group; it does not pay attention to the new immigrant welfare policy, but also the suppression of land immigrants. The new immigrant group may not agreeDPP government policy.
