Author: Tang Jiazheng
Today, under the pursuit of hegemonism, the definition of national security has been promoted to endless, which can be said to be another generation of nouns.It is generally regarded as a activity of commercial trade, multinational investment and scientific and technological development. As long as it is from China, it is a crime that endangers national security.After the United States fought against China on a trade war, the Trump regime immediately transferred the suppression target to the communication systems and technologies such as Huawei, ZTE, Douyin, and WeChat.The vowing to clearly clear the river and Han realm with China, and push the relationship between the two countries to a comprehensive and hostile situation.
Many human rights and constitutional scholars have begun to question how in a country where the three powers are separated and the constitutional protection of human rights, how can there be some important world core values such as freedom of exploitation of administrative instructions, ignoring rights of rights or asset rights, fair competition, etc.The totalitarian behavior.Many people infer that the September 1st incident gave an excellent excuse for the US administrative organs to magnify the administrative power infinitely.These arguments have been found from the US judicial system to voluntarily abandon the balance of balance of balance.This transition is evident in the case of the famous American Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project.You can find this paragraph from the judgment of the Supreme Court in the United States in the case: In terms of national security and terrorist issues, the court lacks the ability to search for evidence and make facts. Therefore, the conclusion of the government must be appropriate.hellip; These conclusions are often based on information judgment more than authentic evidence hell; hellip; but when the government claims to prevent instant damage on international affairs and national security issuesTogether, we only agree with the government's conclusions.In other words, as long as the government and the parliament propose sufficient allegations, the judicial organs will automatically abandon the power of judicial checks and balances and accept these allegations.This position is not completely independent of the parliament and administrative organs for the US judicial system.
In this case, the state has encountered political scammers such as Trump, coupled with the political identity of parliament, the president can do whatever he wants.The fact is that these domineering behaviors do not need to exist with the National Security Law to pull a lot of relationships, let alone a convincing fact and evidence.This is a manifestation of naked people, and the United States has never made any political makeup or concealment of the essence of these behaviors.Coupled with the strong influence of the United States, many countries that have always benefited from the United States are even more capable or will to question these allegations of lack of factual reason. Under this circumstances, it is easy to become one of the US presidents.
From the perspective of China, it is not so much that can be done.Of course, China can use teeth to return to teeth and make corresponding attacks. It is also based on national security to comprehensively block the United States' US companies in China, including the SAR; but is this a great way?Is a big country worth taking care of the overall interests of the country and the length of the villain?Or is the gentleman and the villain.
From another perspective, dancing with Trump and Wolf not only degraded China's identity, but also might be in Trump's arms.Needless to say, he thought it was to push Sino -US opposition to the highest peak, and even provoked regional armed conflicts, creating a total of evil enemies for domestic election, and using the enemy to cover his incompetence and dictatorship.If this is the case, why should China be aid for Trump?In the long run, the national emotions of the American Qiuhua have undergone these four years, which is not so easy to reduce or change.The world peace is in danger, and the trend has always been worrying.
