Source: China Times Society

Zhang Nianchi, the director of the Shanghai East Asia Research Institute, wrote in the China Times, calling on the cross -strait concept to create a new concept of China, but was criticized by Li Yi, the martial arts faction of the mainland. Chen Kongli, the former director of the Xiamen University Research Institute, wrote to Zhang Nianchi.In the mainland community media, he reproduced a large number of articles in Li Yi, as well as Taiwan ’s unified online celebrities to support Li Yi.Sino -US relations have deteriorated the sensitive nerves on both sides of the strait.

Zhang Nianchi and Chen Kongli are Thai -related circles in the mainland, and they are not at the same level as the people of Wutongists. There is no need for discussion in this pen battle.Wu Tong's debate and quarrel lasted at least 30 years.However, the long -term arguments have been separated by newspapers and magazines as the position. Later, the rise of television political theory programs and turned into faced decisions, but they still said that the literatiism of the literati discussion was for the aftermath of tea.However, in 2016, the rotation of the political party and the deterioration of cross -strait relations, coupled with the rise of the Internet, the dispute with the Tong VS martial arts has become a collision of 100,000, millions, and even 10 million.

At this point, the content of the debate between the two factions is unchanged, the form has changed, and the nature has changed. It is no longer a simple policy debate, but the wind of populism tsunami, and even devour the rational cognition of society, elite circle, and decision -making.In this battle with Wu Lun, most people in Taiwan watched the fire across the shore, while the independence was very ridiculous. The perspective of supporting martial arts theory has become the shells of the martial arts of the mainland, and it is even more violently bombarded by the unification.

The disappointment of Taiwan's unified and unified prospects should be understood.Frankly speaking, with the current mainstream public opinion of Taiwan, the route of Taiwan's governors, and the unity in Taiwan's difficult and dangerous survival situation, the unification of the two sides of the strait cannot be led by Taiwan. Taiwan is incompetent and unwilling to promote unification. This is indeed a fact.Therefore, when people discuss the martial arts or the same, it is clear that it is specifically referring to the Taiwan policy of Taiwan. This is of course the policy agenda within the mainland, but it is related to the safety of the lives and property of each Taiwanese, and naturally cannot be placed out of the matter.

If you really understand the Taiwan policy and understand the long -term strategy of the Chinese Communist Party, you should realize that the CCP, which emphasizes materialist dialectics, will never have the opposite and martial arts and martial arts.As far as the logic of the Communist Party is concerned, solving the problem of Taiwan is the goal, and the battle with the war is just a two -hand strategy.Otherwise, how can there be three major conditions provided by anti -split national law?Otherwise, how can there be a pile game on both sides of the diplomatic occasion?Otherwise, how can there be Xi Wujiao reiterating not to give up force against Taiwan?

Under the guidance of the Material Dialectics, the CCP has not given up the issue of martial arts.Even Chen Kongli and Zhang Nianchi have never made remarks such as abolishing anti -split national laws or withdrawal missiles, and even they are the Chinese Communist Party's decision -making participants in Taiwan's attack on the martial arts.However, as long as a peaceful policy of peace and unity is written into the report of the Communist Party of China for a day, Chen Kongli, Zhang Nianchi and others resorted to the peaceful and unified mission of Taiwan's peace and unity in a gentle and rational language.In other words, the mainland's proposal and unity of the Taiwan pigeons, how to study the Taiwan scholars is due to their duties, and there is no problem of abandoning the martial arts.

In this way, I can see the mystery of the mystery: those who oppose them with the confrontation and martial arts, and the denying of Wu Tong is the one who has no intention of touching the fish with muddy water.In this regard, the people of the mainland should polish their eyes, and the people of Taiwan must look seriously.

In particular, Taiwanese people use martial arts to negate, criticize and unify, and attack the mainland scholars in Taiwan, which is tantamount to the pain of relatives, the avengers, and the missiles are not long, and the war is unknown.The Mainland Martial Arts also needs to understand that when the United States believes that in 30 years of contact with land failed, it will change to anger the CCP and seduce or force its violence or retreat to the country, which will make the results of the reform and opening up of the mainland.If the two sides of the strait form a confrontation between martial arts and martial arts and martial arts, the Taiwan Strait is stirring in war, and the United States can throw away China without any effort.The Chinese Communist Party has won Taiwan at the cost of sacrificing 30 years. The United States has re -stabilized the global boss at the expense of Taiwan. Who will make a loss and who will win?

Wu Tong is not the mainstream of mainland society, and Taiwan independence is not the belief of most people in Taiwan. The pursuit of a good life, the peaceful coexistence on both sides of the strait, and the fit of the mind are the voice of the people on both sides of the strait.Even if the environment is difficult, the peaceful cross -strait peace school should insist on promoting cross -strait communication and resolving the knot on both sides of the strait.Oppositioning martial arts should be the basic conscience of Taiwanese, which is undoubted.