Zhongshi Electronics News
According to an article on the China Times of Taiwan, the Hong Kong National Security Law takes effect, which has caused a significant impact on Lu and the United States relations, cross -strait relations, and Taiwan -Hong Kong relations. The DPP government has supported Hong Kong with the United States, but the mouth benefits are more than substantial.The Hong Kong National Security Law is like a demon mirror. According to the DPP, the DPP will only seek political interests from Hong Kong. It also sees that the Cai government has repeatedly used the reasons of defensive democracy.There is no time to rough, and what qualifications are the CCP?
The Tsai government forced the amendment of the National Security Five Law last year. Later, it also introduced the reverse osmosis method. On the clarity of the exquisiteness of legislative technology and the definition of criminal behavior, the Hong Kong National Security Law is relatively high -quality.Exquisite and delicate with reverse osmosis.Among them, the most proper is that the reverse osmosis method has all included the political rights such as the election platform, the publicity of the candidate to promote and promote the voting of citizens into the criminal constituent elements, and almost incorporate the university and important think tank institutions of the mainland.The cold cicada effect and negative impact are great.
Anti -democracy under the banner of democracy
This is the Democratic Progressive Party government, in the name of defending democracy. The actual bill of actual launch is full of white terror DNA. The deserted cavity can not be added.The Democratic Progressive Party government first used the transformation of justice to clear the white terror of the year. How can the DPP, known as promoting the democratic constitutional government in Taiwan to use the same thinking during the mobilization of the chaos?This is nothing more than the CCP to intimidate the people to consolidate its own power of governance while cutting off cross -strait exchanges, and to trample on the rule of law and freedom for this reason.
The DPP government recently expelled two mainland journalists to recruit criticism and was considered to deviate from the concept of freedom of the press. Unexpectedly, someone took the opportunity to talk about defensive democratic arguments.EssenceThe so -called defensive democracy is not nonsense, because to ensure national security, democratic value and lifestyle, positive measures must be prevented from being eroded and hollowed out by maliciously.
The concept of defensive democracy comes from Article 21 of the German Basic Law. It means that political parties or party members intend to destroy or overthrow the order of freedom democracy or the intention of harming the German Federal Republic.In addition, in addition to the dissolution of the constitutional party system, the German federal criminal law also has criminal punishment regulations to destroy public peace, incite race, religion or other similar groups, and prohibit denying, diluting or supporting national socialism and the past of the Nazi past.For remarks, this is based on defensive democracy.Germany is the most restricted country in Western democratic countries. It can be limited to the expression of remarks because of the potential damage of democracy.
This specification is not universal. The United States Constitution is another set. The freedom of speech is almost absolutely protected. The rights to citizens are constructed and protected by individualism. The country can only do the least supervision.The concept of German defensive democracy comes from the special experience of Wima Republic after a war. Wima Constitution adopts a democratic freedom system, but quickly collapses in the political movement of the totalitarianism.The law is supporting.
From the perspective of interpretation of constitutionalism, Taiwan tends to the concept of the United States. The Judge's interpretation No. 499 explained to confirm the foundation of the Constitution that the constitutional order of freedom and democracy. The specific practice of the Taiwan Constitution did not adopt the concept of Germany's defensive democracy.As for the freedom of speech, the coordination of Judge Xu Zongli Yu Shizi No. 644 has a reference value. He believes that defense democracy is not applicable to the freedom of speech in Taiwan.Principles are obviously different from the Basic Law of Germany.
Become a tool to eliminate dissidents
Even if the tone of the German Basic Law, the statement of democratic countries should not be tolerant to advocate dictatorship and hostile democratic constitution, and must fight against each other.But how is the problem be confirming what kind of remarks are hostile democracy, and what kind of situation needs to get up to defense?German society has a high consensus on this, and political party law has strict restrictions on political party activities, and public power can also actively intervene, so there is no doubt and conflict.In contrast, Taiwan's ideological confrontation has intensified. How can we define the enemy under the premise that there is no common country recognition?What kind of behavior is harmful to the order of freedom and democracy?If the ruling authorities are determined, wouldn't defensive democracy be a tool to eliminate dissidents?
Democracy needs defense, but the effective way of defense democracy is not to give people more power more power, but to give the people's freedom, freedom of speech, and room for the opposition party activities.The Democratic Progressive Party already has too many resources and power, for Taiwan's democracy can be long -term, talk less about democratic defense, and talk about free protection!
