Recently, Kunming primary school students have been questioned by netizens to study cancer awards, causing heated discussions.On July 15th, the 34th Yunnan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Contest Organizing Committee Office issued a notification to revoke the first prize of the student.
On the evening of July 15th, the Office of the 34th Yunnan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Contest Organizing Committee issued investigations and handling results on the incident of primary school students' research on cancer papers.Writing ability, the project research report cannot be independently written by the author himself. According to the suggestion of the jury, the organizing committee decided to revoke the first prize of the 34th Yunnan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Achievement Project (Primary School Group) to take the medals and certificates.EssenceOn the afternoon of the 15th, the award -winning elementary school student Chen Moumou issued an open letter to the public, admitting that during the project application process, he excessively participated in the compilation of the textbook text materials and used a large number of biomedical professional terms.At the same time, he applied to the contest organizing committee to submit the award obtained by the project, and respects and obey the contest organizing committee's opinion on the project award.
From this matter, we can see the chaos of academic achievements.The name of the name like this is only a very small number in China. More academic achievements are falsely named. It is the result of the results of not participating in the substantial work of officials and senior experts. It is recommended that relevant national departments consider it carefully and regard the academic achievements as academics.The corruption behavior in the field has been promoted to the height of corruption to hit, so that it can hit the key to all.
The author has been engaged in scientific research for many years, knowing the root cause and harm of the proliferation of false names in the field of scientific research.The root cause is basically as follows: First, the supervision confirmation procedures for academic names are incomplete or not.The second is that the cost of illegal regulations for academic names is still too low.The third is that it is not enough to combat academic false names.The fourth is that many of the famous people are officials and experts. Those who are under scientific research under their hands are completely unsuitable, and they have more choices to swallow.Sometimes it is complete, because the name of the expert or the name of officials is easy to win.
In the definition of academic publishing specifications Mdash; MDASH; mdash; in the definition of academic misconducts of journals, improper signatures have just been officially included in the category of academic inconsistency.
In November 2018, the General Office of the Ministry of Education issued a notice and decided to carry out the work of cleaning the arguments, hats, job title, academic qualifications, and only awards in colleges and universities.The document believes that only by breaking the Wuwei in depth and changing the current rigid professional title review system and academic evaluation orientation, instead of a scientific, reasonable, and diverse review system, can we fundamentally remove the soil that breeds academic names and chaos.
However, the author believes that if the academic false name is directly qualitatively qualitative to corruption, it will be a cure method.
The names of leaders or experts who have no substantial work participation in scientific research awards are a kind of scientific research corruption of scientific researchers and interests of scientific researchers.It seriously affects the scientific research enthusiasm of specific scientific researchers, and seriously restricts the active creation of scientific research results.This kind of scientific research must rose to the height of anti -corruption in order to eradicate it. Leaders and experts cannot grab their fame and profit with scientific researchers in real affairs.It is a minimum respect for the person who has achieved scientific research results in scientific research and gains in scientific research.It is also the guarantee of scientific research incentives to play a normal incentive role.
Academic name is not a matter of style, and its harm is as fierce.First of all, the academic rules disrupted.Some leaders, experts, use their status, status and power to capture the scientific research results of researchers, obtain personal fame and fortune in a murderous manner, and want to disrupt academic rules.Secondly, the academic atmosphere was corrupted.A good academic atmosphere is a necessary condition for the development of scientific research. It requires the joint maintenance of scientific researchers. The random interference of administrative power will destroy this good atmosphere.Leaders' names and not engaged in specific research work can easily form a bad atmosphere of scientific research, so that the power of the power and horse head is a bad atmosphere, and then defile the academic environment of scientific research. In the endAnd aspiration.Secondly, it will also promote academic dislocation.There are many kinds of academic non -endless behavior. One of them is the name of the scientific research results of others, including the results, subjects, papers, works, patents, etc. of others.The leadership is applied for the project, and the host does not bear the specific research tasks. When the paper is published, not only the name is also listed as the first author. This is a typical academic dislocation.
These phenomena were previously under the jurisdiction of the administrative administrative in charge of education, and they were far from being strong. They should be responsible for the Discipline Inspection Commission.Academic achievements such as thesis, monograph and other academic achievements and author sorting, reflecting the degree of participation of scientific researchers in research.The name of those who do not contribute to academic contributions are essentially a disciplinary corruption behavior that uses power to seize interests.
Academic name chaos is far -reaching.Those who are well -known, do not put their minds on teaching and scientific research, and want to take shortcuts, violate academic norms and the principles of integrity.Campaigning the name can also make the named person more practical to participate in real scientific research and allow them to invest more in real scientific research work.of.
The last summary is a sentence: the academic name should be directly qualitatively characterized by corruption, which can not only protect the scientific enthusiasm of non -official non -officials, non -officials, and non -big coffee experts.This is an academic corruption that must be attached to the blow of science and technology. Otherwise, no matter how good the scientific research policies must be hollowed out by this corruption, no matter how good scientific research expects, it will be faked by scientific research.We cannot afford the deficiency and fakes of national scientific research, especially the increasingly fierce competition between China and the United States.
In today's increasingly fierce competition between China and the United States, paying attention to the true and truth of Chinese scientific research, should use heavy codes!
Author: Peng Shengyu
Strategic Researcher
