The Hong Kong National Security Law took effect immediately after the full text of the evening of June 30.The implementation of this special day on July 1 has made the National Security Law have the significance of a certain era.The second return is the interpretation of some public opinion, which gives it special value.
Will this be the second return of Hong Kong, can it truly realize the return of Hong Kong people?Now asserting that it is too early to assert, after all, the return of the people's hearts is far away.But the deterrent effect brought by this law is obvious.
As early as before the Hong Kong National Security Law was officially effective, many original traditional democratic people in Hong Kong or those who were directly engaged in the Hong Kong independence movement, or cut off with Hong Kong independence, organizations, and violent claims, or announced the dissolution of relevant organizations, staying away from Hong Kong away from Hong Kong.EssenceThis includes Chen Fangsheng and Li Zhuming of traditional pan -democrats, as well as Huang Zhifeng, Luo Guancong, Zhou Ting and others of the new generation.The deterrent effect of the Hong Kong National Security Law is evident.
For the outside world, the role of this law is obviously more than that.In a sense, it does change the implementation of the two systems and two systems in Hong Kong.According to the Hong Kong National Security Law, the newly established National Security Office has become the fourth mainland official institution that has been publicly established and operated in Hong Kong.Although three institutions in the mainland had been stationed in Hong Kong before that, the National Security Office was the only institution in Hong Kong.This is a fundamental change.
Some public opinion believes that one country and two systems have changed from here to one Hong Kong and two governances. This statement is not wrong.After 23 years of return, Hong Kong has ushered in great changes.Beijing's governance system finally entered Hong Kong.If the time goes back, Luo Huining and Xia Baolong will start when they serve as related positions in Hong Kong.
Now, this huge change will not only further change the implementation of one country, two systems, but also instantly calm Hong Kong. Since last year, the large -scale demonstrations caused by revised fugitive regulations.In the short term, I believe it is difficult to see a large -scale demonstration like last year.
Only how Yu Bo will affect Hong Kong, and even the political trend of the three places on both sides of the strait, is the most sensitive under this huge change, and it may be the most difficult to detect at the moment.
The transformation of a governance model is largely a summary of the past history.In the past 23 years, there have been many political fighting campaigns in Hong Kong. It is simply summarized and can basically be divided into two types. One is the fighting route adopted by traditional pan -democratic factions.
The purpose of this route is very simple. It originated in the 1980s and is closely linked to the political storm of the spring and summer of mainland China in the spring and summer of 1989.This method of fighting tries to achieve democratization in Hong Kong and promote political changes in the mainland. Before the 50 -year commitment period arrived, the two sides of the Shenzhen River finally coexist and integrate because of the consistency or similar values.
But this kind of obviously unrealistic route now, in 2014, the Chinese Movement, the riots in Mong Kok in 2016, and even last year's repair storm, finally returned to history.The street political confrontation campaign led by young people has become a new way of confrontation.
The emergence of this method is to say goodbye to the previous protest method.Its source of thought and behavior is based on cutting with the mainland.It is above this root that the main identity of Hong Kong identity has been produced and strengthened.This identity has a deeper local political soil than in the past.
Now, although these movements have faded with the effectiveness of the Hong Kong National Security Law.It is just a strong political pressure. Maybe it can quickly remove all tangible obstacles on the streets of Hong Kong, but it is difficult to completely eradicate the ideological concepts and consciousness rooted in the spiritual world.
On the contrary, with the fleeing of some Hong Kong people, the international existence of these people has made such protests have a more abstract spiritual symbolic significance.It may have a significant impact on the establishment and formation, consolidation and continuation of Hong Kong people's identity.This is where Beijing needs to face up and pay attention.
As for the local area of Hong Kong, I am afraid that more problems will be caused by the vagueness of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law, such as the tear and extremeization of society.This extremeization is bound to further strengthen the consciousness of the main body of Hong Kong people that has been emphasized since last year.
The definition of vague crimes plays an important role in the implementation and deterrent of the National Security Law in Hong Kong, but it also means that it has a huge impact in the heart of a person.No one can accurately understand their position, and eventually leads to the emergence of two extreme people, either conservatively conservatively concession to a safe corner, or holding a death, it is better to fight to the end.Hong Kong society may be more tear.
Under such a background, how to implement the Hong Kong National Security Law, how to explain to the local people of Hong Kong to explain the level, scope, and methods of the natives of Hong Kong, and the importance is not lower than the appearance of the National Security Law itself.The Hong Kong National Security Law has made the distance between Hong Kong and Beijing no longer far.But Beijing's control over Hong Kong, what it means to mean in the background of the new era, is worth thinking about repeatedly.
In the past 70 years, the three places on both sides of the strait seek their own value and development direction with their own different development methods and paths.Even after Hong Kong returned in 1997, he still had the opportunity to explore its own destiny and direction.Now, the emergence of a law has basically changed the governance model of Hong Kong, and it is bound to greatly limit the possibility of free development.
Looking for the identity of Hong Kong people, to some extent, since the 1980s, it has continuously constructed the identity based on its own development.Although this process is long, the main identity of the Taiwanese will not be completed until 2020.In the process, external pressures are all to promote their thinking, constant positioning, and gradually complete the construction of the main elements.
Just as we saw at the election of Tsai Ing -wen last year and this year's inauguration ceremony, the dark green colors of the DPP in the past incorporated more flags of the Republic of China.Just as Tsai Ing -wen advocated the Republic of China, the integration between the two means the completion of the identity of the Taiwanese, and successfully devoured the color represented by the Republic of China.
In this sense, after the emergence of the Hong Kong National Security Law, the relationship between the three places on both sides of the strait may become more clear.In the past 70 years of independent exploration, their respective colors have become clearer.
In the past, the two forces in Hong Kong and Taiwan were cases of possible changes in mainland China, but in the future, it may become an important force to restrict the expansion of the mainland.The disappearance of one country and two systems in the eyes of some foreign politicians and the media will become a notes of this huge change.
The 41 -day -old law, the great changes brought about by Hong Kong, are a battle or tactical victory for Beijing.But after the huge changes, the influence of its influence is more profound than it.
The author is a freelance writer in Beijing, China
The great changes that have been passed by 41 days to Hong Kong are a battle or tactical victory for Beijing.But after the huge changes, the influence of its influence is more profound than it.
