Early
Hunsheng paper description
In China, whenever there are hot incidents, new words in the Internet are often born.In the past few days, Chinese netizens with unlimited creativity have invented a hot word: teasing goose grievances, specifically referring to the Internet giant Tencent, which was also ridiculed by the entire network after being deceived.
Tencent, with the image of penguin as a trademark, has always been called a goose factory by Chinese netizens.It is well -known for its online products such as QQ and WeChat, and because of its strong legal department, it has the alias of Nanshan Pizza Hut Mdash; MDASH; Tencent Headquarters is located in Nanshan District, Shenzhen. Netizens joked that it has never lost a lawsuit here.However, Last week Tencent planted a big heel on a lawsuit.
The matter should start with a civil ruling issued by the Nanshan District Court last week.This ruling judgment seizes and frozen the name of the well -known chili sauce brand of 16.24 million yuan (RMB, Same, ST $ 3.2 million) assets under the name.Long -term arrears costs, Tencent resorted to legal recovery of arrears.
This seemingly unusual business dispute was that the old godmother had denied that she had signed a cooperation agreement and said Tencent was deceived and caused public attention.The development of the situation was even more unexpected: After the old godmother called the police, the Guiyang police arrested three suspects the next day, and found that they forged the seal of the old godmother company.Get the online game gifts given by Tencent in the promotion activity, and then sell it to the gamers to make a profit.
The police reported that public opinion was uproar, and Tencent's official had to post on social media to laughed at himself: the pepper sauce at noon today was not fragrant. Hellip; hellip; and the netizen ridiculed: I always thought Tencent was lsquo; fighting goose rsquo;It's only lsquo; silly white goose rsquo;!
Although more than 10 million yuan of advertising fees for Tencent with a market value of nearly 5 trillion yuan are just Jiu Niu and one hair, the outside world is curious that this Internet giant that has established more than 20 years has been planted on such a primitive business scam.Followed?
Industry insiders pointed out that such 10 million yuan of cooperation and promotion projects involve marketing, legal affairs, finance and products. Customers usually need to pay a prepaid to pay for the amount, and then pay the remaining models in stages in stages.Before signing contracts with the first cooperation, you often have to review qualified documents such as business licenses and visit the other company.It is difficult to imagine that Tencent signed an agreement with the scammer with a fake official seal without verifying the identity, and did not require the other party to pay the security deposit or pay in installments.
In fact, the large enterprises deceived by the fake official seal are not only Tencent.In 2018, BYD, an electric vehicle company, found that someone posted as a company executive and passed the forged seal to cooperate with more than 30 advertising companies for three years, and the amount involved exceeded 1 billion yuan.A supplier of the e -commerce platform JD.com also faked financing with JD.com's business contract through fake seal. JD.com did not discover the matter until the creditor was sued by the court last year.
How to solve the problem of fake official seal?The hardest core response is to abandon the official seal and switch to the signature of electronic.After Tencent's deception incident, its competitors in the field of fintech, Alipay, quickly became popular. While posting Weibo, she hoped that there was no false chapter in the world.Advertising for Alipay's blockchain anti -pseudo technology.
However, blockchain technology also has its own limitations.It can only ensure that the contract after the signing is not tampered with, but whether the transactions in the contract really exist, whether the person who signed the contract has the authority of the company, and it still must be verified by artificially and cannot work by science and technology.
In other words, the company recruited in the fake official seal scam is not because of the lack of high -tech, but because it has not fulfilled complete authentication and strict due diligence, which also reflects the company's risk control formula.Responsible personnel choose to recognize the rules for simplifying the verification process, and provide the opportunity for the fake official seal.
The Chinese financial market has developed rapidly in recent years, and more and more companies have gone abroad to go public, but business integrity is still a major problem that plagues Chinese companies.At the beginning of the year, Ruixing's counterfeit storm seriously cracked down on the image of overseas Chinese concept stocks, and eventually led to this former Chinese stock star was removed.Recently, the incident of teasing goose more intuitively highlight the long -term risk control loopholes that Chinese companies have been criticized for a long time, and even hegemony companies like Tencent have not been spared.
In addition to lagging corporate management levels, not enough laws and regulations and insufficient supervision, it is also a guidance for commercial fraud incidents.To solve this problem, it is not a day's work, nor can it be relying on Tencent or Alipay's power.Since April this year, China's financial market has been open to foreign countries. More foreign financial institutions will settle in this vast market, provide services to Chinese companies, and cooperate with them.How to maintain business integrity in a more open and more complex market is a challenge for enterprises, regulators and law enforcement departments to deal with them together.
