So far, the sociology, political, and historical research with China as the object has undergone changes in generations.
In the first generation, Chinese research under the influence of the Soviet Union was restricted by the paradigm of totalitarianism; the second generation, the United States -based Chinese research, was obsessed with the Chinese social revolution movement; the third generation, Chinese research with European scholars as the main body,Try to understand the process of being restrained and promoted between the state and society in Chinese society.
With the opening up of China, a large number of Chinese scholars and overseas Chinese studies (China Studies) have gradually formed effective communication and dialogue, breaking the inherent disciplines and paradigm.
The coronary virus epidemic in 2019 has challenged the development of Chinese research and provided opportunities.Compared with hard sciences such as biology and virus, the contribution of Chinese research is not unknown.
Sociological research is not the same as natural science. It can release exciting and visible new achievements from time to time in providing antidote.Social science emphasizes the exposure of existing system disadvantages, social inequality, ugly human nature under extreme circumstances, rumors and false information control over public opinion.It is an unprecedented crisis such as coronal virus that provides a platform for development of Chinese research.
Pursuing certainty is human nature.The most dangerous of coronary virus is not its mortality, but its uncontrollable impact on human society.Uncertainty will cause huge social panic. The triggered rumors, blindly listening to rumors, stigmatized certain social groups, and cyberbulsus, these consequences are more fatal than the virus itself.Therefore, it is obviously unfair to solve the heavy responsibility of solving the problem of virus problems to natural science researchers.
Our understanding of coronal virus is still very shallow, and even scientists are so, even more politicians.It is conceivable that the people's lack of knowledge, once the use of politicians, what kind of social turmoil will cause.The tracking of patients Zero fully reflects the political game behind the resistance.We can see from the history of the zero patients of love of love. It is very difficult to find the zero patients in the true biological sense scientifically; this process is no longer a simple scientific discussion, but this process is no longer a simple scientific discussion, but but alsoBecome an accomplice of racial discrimination and sexual orientation discrimination.
In the crown disease epidemic, some politicians regarded the epidemic as a weight of political speculation for political interests, and pushed the shudder in blame and even the fire.In this context, the tracking of patients Zero is no longer a simple scientific issue.Scientists have repeatedly clarified, and they cannot eliminate conspiracy theories such as viruses from laboratory.
What's more, some academic exchange platforms have also become a political corner field.In the early days of the epidemic, the major publishers opened pre -printing thesis in order to facilitate the scientific research in the state of crisis.Scholars are also actively published through social media such as Twitter.However, the coronary virus also exactly exposed the weakness of this research: some researchers are quick -profit to expand their popularity in the way of attracting eyeballs, and even bring political colors in the research, becoming an accomplice to spread false information.
With the deepening of scientific research, scientists will eventually have clear answers on how the virus spreads, how to mutate, and how human immunity should cope with these mutations.However, there is more time for sociological research on coronary viruses.
At present, in the eyes of some people in the West, China is still generally considered to be the source of viruses, so many sociological studies are inevitably involved in the relationship between China and the international community.The crown disease epidemic is intertwined with Sino -US trade, which has put forward new challenges to Sino -US relations.The mutual accusations of the people have developed into a saliva war on diplomatic occasions, which hinders the international community's cooperation against virus.
In the year of Gengzi, natural disasters and human disasters were superimposed, which influenced each other, which made people smell the atmosphere of the world.At this moment, the media is more willing to help the flames.This is not surprising, because creating hotspots and attracting attention is the essence of the media.
As a serious Chinese researcher, he should neither follow the trend, nor should he forget that scholars are also the creators of history.Regardless of the purpose of legalization of certain policies or the pure pursuit of academics, it may have an impact on policies.Rather than being passively used by politicians to prove the legitimacy of its policy, and even deliberately interpreted, it is better to seize the opportunity, actively affect and participate in policy formulation.
History has proven more than once that misjudgment in a certain detail may lead to a major military conflict.Scholars and think tanks are a line of defense among nationalists who block the nationalists who are angry and angry. Their careful verification may avoid an imminent disaster.
In China, disciplines such as politics and international studies are still in a position that is isolated in the world due to the influence of language and ideology.Studies in domestic and abroad are like two parallel worlds, running according to their own paradigms, and rarely communicate with each other.
It is true that some Western scholars do use the discourse hegemony of Western countries in international relations to promote democracy, and it is a hegemony.The asymmetry of this academic discourse makes it difficult for China's political and international relations to enter the international context.Although there are famous scholars such as Qin Yaqing, they try to seek the establishment of international relations with international relations, but the research of a large number of Chinese scholars still failed to get enough attention.
At the same time, it should be acknowledged that China's international relations research is still at the stage of learning.To establish the right to speak internationally, we need to improve the existing evaluation system so that good research will be respected.In the study of Chinese issues, ideological problems are the existence of reality, but ideology should not be a puppet of academic research, nor should it be the motivation for the academic community to fight each other.Conversely, academic research should be a bridge for different ideological people to communicate and communicate.
China ’s international problem scholars should have a self -confidence and open mind, with a spirit of truth and pragmatic, and have a effective, constructive, factual and logical dialogue with Western scholars, and gradually built in the international academic world.
In
