US President Trump opposed mailing votes on the social platform Tuesday (26th). It is mentioned that mailing votes can be deceived and there is never possible.A few hours later, the twitter system's exclamation sign logo appeared under the relevant posts. It is to be verified that the postal votes are required to remind users that this post may be misleading.As a result, Madman President Trump was furious, and he even criticized Twitter to completely kill the freedom of speech.
Twitter's misleading information guidelines for Trump's voting method this time are the regulations formulated based on eliminating the misleading information of the epidemic in the previous period.For example, in addition to the labeling of Trump's tweets about posting voting, the tweets of the President of Brazil and Venezuela have also been deleted.At present, although the regulations extend to other fields, they are still mainly targeted at politicians.For many opponents who think Trump often runs with a train, this time Twitter can be described as executive justice, and alert Trump needs to be cautious, but on the other hand, this has also aroused many public concerns about social platform speech reviewEssence
According to another social platform giant Facebook President Juckerberg, although he did not directly comment on Trump on Thursday (28th), he also talked about his attitude towards online platform speech review.He said that social platforms should not be the referee of the truth, and also mentioned that remarks should not be too strict.
Examination criteria is most important
As we pointed out earlier, of course, information or social platforms must have a review of the necessary degree, but the review should mainly target the harmful information of bottom lines such as bloody, hatred, and violence, instead of obliging non -polar content.The content of the gray zone can be handled by the user through the reporting mechanism, or the reminder and other methods.This may allow most of the content to communicate diverse, avoid the misunderstanding of AI or the subjective deviation of the examiner to make the content single, and it can avoid the spread of the extreme colorful content.
The way Twitter reminds Trump's information this time, although there is no role of the ball certificate, but there is still room for improvement. The most important thing is that the principle of review should be specific and transparent to avoid the public's questioning whether it is fairly questioning whether it is fair.EssenceFor example, Twitter judged that Trump's tweet was misleading whether it was impossible for mailing votes to be or Trump's explanation of the impact of mailing votes.This reminder to Trump's tweet is based on the misleading information guidelines specified in the epidemic, and obviously may not have universal characteristics since then.When the regulations extend to other issues and are no longer limited to politicians, how to determine the standards of misleading information, Twitter must have public specifies, so as not to be questioned as public opinion.
Of course, in addition to the review of the social platform, this incident also reminds the public figures to speak more cautiously.Trump's random speaking may have become the norm, but politicians in other places should also avoid passing by.For example, the Hong Kong Legislative Councilor Jiang Liyun's practice of sterilizing steaming masks on the personal social network earlier has caused many people to worry that it is not an effective practice.In fact, not just public figures, everyone can get a seat in public discourse space in the Internet era.And this more open public speech space is better than the disadvantages, or the disadvantage is greater than the advantages, is the improvement of the review system and the self -standards of each user.
