Ming Pao Society Review
The National People's Congress passed the bill, and the Standing Committee of the People's Congress of the People's Congress formulated the "National Security Law of the Port District".In Hong Kong, different camps have two poles, and some people support legislation to maintain national security. Some people question that one country and two systems have died.One country, two systems are the unity of contradictions. It is necessary to take into account the "one country" and "two systems", and at the same time, they must also keep the division and limitations in order to be stable and far.EssenceThe Hong Kong independence activity has changed from darkness, and the central government cannot be at ease; many Hong Kong people have worries about the National Security Law of the Hong Kong District and restless at the atmosphere. It is similar to the resumption of sovereignty in Hong Kong in the early 1980s.Insufficient trust, it takes time to re -run in and rebuild trust.
The National Security Law highlights the problem of mutual trust
Hong Kong people are like the early 1980s.
The relevant decisions passed by the National People's Congress proposed to split the country, subvert the state power, andOrganize the implementation of terrorist activities, as well as foreign forces to interfere with the four categories of crimes of Hong Kong affairs to maintain national security.The decision -making introduction reflects the central government's research on the current situation in Hong Kong, including Hong Kong's various types of illegal activities such as "Hong Kong independence, division of state, and violent terrorist activities", and some overseas forces are "using Hong Kong to engage in activities that endanger national security."In the eyes of the central government, "the national security risks of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region are prominent", it is necessary to formulate legal and execution mechanisms, and "prevent, stop and punish" behaviors and activities that "prevent, stop and punish".Hong Kong fulfills the responsibility of maintaining Guoan, and regularly submits a report to the central government.
In recent years, the gap between Hong Kong and the Mainland has become deeper and deeper. Some people do not understand or intend to understand the operation of the Mainland.It is still being formulated by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, and it is expected to be introduced for a while.The decision text passed yesterday, compared with the draft of the draft, made some words amendments, such as one of them "the behavior of prohibiting the harm of Guoan" and "the behavior and activity that prohibit the harm of Guoan".Some of the legal community in Hong Kong pay attention to expanding the scope of regulatory punishment, and some people in the Hong Kong area. The other parts of the text have already said "behavior and activities". Related changes are only used for uniform words without excessive interpretation.Of course, "behavior" and "behavior and activity" are of course different. However, the national security law in the port area is still being drafted.If you are punishment, etc., you must wait for the law to be completed to complete the work before you can comment.
The central government's formulation of the Guoan Law of the Hong Kong District will have time to observe the influence of Hong Kong in the future; Washington threatens sanctions, Beijing is countermeasures, Hong Kong becomes a "battlefield", political fog is shrouded, which is more likely to make people easierI feel confused.According to the latest foreign media, Washington may cancel Hong Kong's special preferential treatment in tourist visas and export tariffs.Compared with the United States' one -year trade surplus to Hong Kong trade about HK $ 200 billion, it is not worth mentioning.The United States hopes to mobilize allies to sanction China, but other countries have their own calculations, and improving the economy must be the first consideration.After the June 4th incident, the West joined forces in China in the early 1990s. At this moment, whether similar situations may be repeated, it is indeed a big question.Of course, the end of the world is chaotic, and it is difficult to eliminate various possibilities. Hong Kong is like a leaf boat. What others do and Hong Kong can't control it. They can only think about the way of being in the storm.
Since the return this time, the central government has decided to implement directly in Hong Kong on Hong Kong's affairs. The practice is unprecedented. Hong Kong's prospects are unknown, Hong Kong people are uneasy, immigration inquiries have increased sharply. Hong Kong issues seem to return 40 years ago 40 years ago.Original point.In the early 1980s, Beijing proposed to the British to restore sovereignty over Hong Kong. Hong Kong society shocked. Some people agreed to return. Many people lacked confidence in the Mainland and chose to immigrate to foreign countries.In order to stabilize people's hearts, the central government proposed the "one country, two systems" policy. Although there have been many twists and turns in the running -in process, they finally found a balance point through the Basic Law to deal with the confidence of Hong Kong people.
After the return, the Hong Kong people and the central government have a honeymoon period. However, in recent years, the relationship between the two parties has tight relations and the problem of confidence has been reproduced, and it is no longer unilaterally doubted the central government in Hong Kong.In this compartment, some Hong Kong people feel that the "comprehensively and accurately implement one country, two systems" mentioned by the central government, and they are concerned with what they think, and they are worried that the "one country" will overwhelm the "two systems".The violence activities continued to grow deeply, and suspected that someone wanted to use the "two systems" to deny the "one country", and to achieve the goal with the help of external forces.One country and two systems are stable and far away. They need to take into account the "one country" and "two systems". They must also recognize the limitations of the two. If all parties are ignored, they must have a big problem. This is also the current dilemma of Hong Kong.
China and Hong Kong must regain the balance point.
It is difficult to run in the difficulty.
From the central perspective, the national security law of the port area is to re -clear the line and curb the destruction.The country's "security activities have repeatedly emphasized that legislation will not affect the freedom and basic rights of general Hong Kong people. However, in Hong Kong, people who want to engage in Hong Kong independence are left aside.After impacting the "two systems" and whether the central government has relevant laws and implementation mechanisms, it will "strictly manage Hong Kong."The problem of mutual trust cannot be achieved overnight. The central and Hong Kong needs to regain the "balance point" for one country, two systems. This process of re -running needs a period of time. The key is that all parties must re -understand and abide by their respective divisions.The central government needs to adhere to the special processing of Hong Kong and two systems to deal with the concerns and concerns of Hong Kong people. At the same time, Hong Kong people must understand that Hong Kong independence will only push Hong Kong down the cliff.
?
