Hong Kong 01: The Xialuo New Bureau is not the end of the one country, two systems

Source: Hong Kong 01

The changes in the style of the two office reflect the new pattern of the central government.We don't tirelessly point out that all this has long been able to follow. From the practice of the one -country, two systems in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in 2014, the decision to improve the one -country and two system systems in the 19th Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.The trend is regarded as the main political contradiction, and there are steps to disorderly disorder anyway.Needless to say, in the Xialuo New Bureau, the central government will leave the game with Hong Kong's appeasement policy, and the political acts that challenge the central bottom line will be severely countered.

To say that the appeasement policy exits, many pan -democrat may disagree. Their imagination of the two systems still seems to stay in the well -watering knowledge of well water, only two systems, ignore one country, ignore their own political actions and Hong Kong society as a wholeThe contradiction of interests is even more blind to Hong Kong's tension that has not fulfilled the national security level and has caused the tension with the fundamental interests of the country.What's even more, the Central Committee asked for this, but they mislead public opinion that Hong Kong's democratic freedom and autonomy are increasingly eroded., Hong Kong will be completely recovered and become one country and one system.This argument reveals the amazing ignorance. If the central government wants to change the one country, two systems, do you need to divide today and tomorrow?Leaving aside a country, two systems, and two systems are given by the national constitution. If the central government is only an autocratic regime in the Pan -people's mouth, it is not necessary to give the Fanmin or Britain and the United States, and it is not necessary to subtly recover its own city.

Some people remember the concessions of the central government in the early days of the return to Hong Kong. Among them, a mentality of just seeking others to care and ignoring their responsibilities. To put it bluntly, it is wayward.In interpersonal relationships, accidents may be exchanged for pity, but the willfulness of continuous and intensified can only be disgusted, as well as political ethics.From this perspective, Hong Kong people believe that the central government's policy after 2012 has changed. Although there are personal factors, there is actually a set of logic.From a macro -history face -oriented face -to -face development after the development of Hong Kong after the return of 1997, it is possible to see how superficial and narrow discipline the central government's persecution of Hong Kong.Article 23 of the Basic Law in 2003, even if it is clearly stipulated in the constitutional responsibility, due to the opposition of Hong Kong citizens, the central government has retired;Is it a central position iron board, or is it that Hong Kong Fanmao is not unplugged?In addition to the politics concession, the central government helped when the Hong Kong economy faced difficulties. In 2003, CEPA and the freedom of freedom were the main driving force for the economic growth of Hong Kong.The effective model of Metropolitan District tries to create plans that are conducive to further development in Hong Kong.

Democratic factions have long regarded the political concessions of the central government as the fruits that they have won. Some radical natives interpreted the policy of benefiting from Hong Kong as the Mainland economy in Hong Kong, and Yelang's great mentality overflowed.However, if you think about it, this is probably not a victory or negative in the eyes of the central government, but tolerance and treating kindness, but you are kindly lingering, in exchange for some politicians to be greedy.Imagine that the Central sense does not feel that the respect should be with you in the constitutional structure, how can you be polite to you?The official media of the Mainland once criticized the radical ideas that they could force the central government to use violence to force the central government to concessions on the principles; we also repeatedly pointed out that violent demonstrations could not solve the problem at all.The fundamental interests of Hong Kong citizens will only be able to end up with a small number of brave and martial arts in the end.

How to operate in one country and two systems has certain elasticity, but no matter how gorgeous the democratic use of the democratic use, it is impossible to change the fundamental fact of Hong Kong as the Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.Looking back at 2014, the central government's publication paper strongly proposed to have a comprehensive governance right to Hong Kong, and made 831 decisions on political reform. In fact, the corresponding Hong Kong social background is that Hong Kong's independence is floating.The anti -repair exercise further made the central government aware that Hong Kong's political risks continued to rise, and it was impossible to continue tolerated, and even cold treatment could not be treated.

Just as parents often swallow the bitter fruit for their daughters, the central government is now at the price of long -term letting Hong Kong.The long -term partial mentality and the wrong communication model have led to some speculative policies.Crooked theory.If the bottom line of the central government in 2014, I hope that Hong Kong people can think about and re -understand it. The new layout from the Fourth Plenary Session to the current two -office layout is that the central government realizes that it is not enough to draw the bottom line.The method of actively involved in Hong Kong's governance, nesting away from the chaos of the political ethics of the central port, and completely eliminating the fermentation of the independence of Hong Kong.Under this context to understand the detailed framework of the Fourth Plenary Session of the two systems and two systems, the central government will understand that the central government has identified the long pain of the central government to deal with the long pain in Hong Kong.

To what extent, Xia Baolong and Luo Huining's Hong Kong and Macau Office and the China United Nations Office can chaos the relationship between central and Hong Kong relations. Whether or not Hong Kong society can follow is to be verified.To be sure, the new normal representative representative of the central and port relations represents the comprehensive retirement policy of the Central Committee with the main axis of the central government, that is, the central government will no longer endure the democratic school repeatedly challenging the central government in the principle of sovereignty, national security, and promoting the stable development of Hong Kong society.It will not sit down at any act of being named by autonomy, or attempting to deny the central bank's sovereignty and define the one country, two systems.This new normal cannot be separated from the international structure to understand. Under the increasingly fierce Sino -US wrestling situation, national security is the fundamental interests that the two sides cannot give up.It is even required to sanction in Hong Kong politicians, which will only be regarded as inciting sinners who endanger national security.The theory of political stir -fry and economic speculation will be considered to be a move of challenging the stable development of Hong Kong, and the central government will not tolerate.

In the past, there were few principles of the principles of the central government in Hong Kong society, let alone pay attention, no one thinks that they need to touch this boundary.The Hong Kong and Macau Office and the China United Nations Office now show that they will not be silent in touching the central bottom line. If politicians are still holding speculation and fluke, they think that provoking right and wrong is still through, but it is just to deceive themselves.Some politicians often warn the central government not to misjudge the people of Hong Kong, and they should not misjudge the political determination.The more realistic issue is that leaving politicians that the power theory of power often hangs on their mouths, the central government is now proved to them that even if they resort to historical facts and jurisdictions, one country, two systems and high autonomy are different from what they imagine.

Highly autonomy in Hong Kong is authorized by the central government, and it is by no means a joint statement in China and the British. Young people may not know their historical background, but will the old -fashioned Pan -politics be unknown?Or is they pretending to be deaf?According to the basic law formulated by the National Constitution, the only legal document authorized Hong Kong to autonomy in Hong Kong.There is an authority for supervision. The two offices have recently stated that they need to exercise the central government's supervision power.The Lawyer Association sent a letter to the government to explain what the supervisory power is, which attracted some politicians.This requirement may seem reasonable, but if the central government really responds, the Standing Committee of the People's Congress will write the supervision rights clearly. Is the person who put forward the request to accept it responsible in accordance with the law?From the perspective of political level, I would like to forcely open the Pandora box, or go back to carefully understand and use the power of being granted, fulfill the corresponding responsibilities and obligations, and be more beneficial to social operations?

If politicians insist on continuing political operations, ignore the bottom line of the Central Government's three orders and five sins, and ignore the fundamental ethics and legal foundations of one country and two systems.If politicians are just speculating with their own political career, and it does not affect the interests of Hong Kong people, it is not particularly unique to others.But in fact, these reckless political gambling have endangered the overall interests of Hong Kong society, and directly pulled young people into water for cannon fodder.On the one hand, many years of political internal consumption have not brought about substantial progress to Hong Kong. Some politicians now advocate to stir -fry, and even legal scholars have thrown out ten steps for frying.The mentality, which is completely distinguished and fried, is unsatisfactory.Hong Kong people should see clearly and think clearly, whether the political prospects depicted by these people canOK?Do they have standing at the front line to lead the enemy, or just ignite the wind next to them, fantasizing that they are Zhuge Kongming, but in fact, is they dreaming about dreams?Every Hong Kong person should ask himself, what is the interests of Hong Kong, and do you continue to bundle the future of Hong Kong with the fantasy of these drool policies and fry them with them?It is as if some people tell the story of shaking the tree as a stir -fry, or will it think so, but will the tree take it seriously?