mdash; mdash; do not have to replace science's own way of discourse with other atmosphere, science is also based on science itself as a pre -question question
At the beginning of the new crown pneumonia's epidemic, Gao Fu and dozens of joint authors of the China Centers for Disease Control and Prevention co -authored two articles: one about the research on the new crown virus and the other about the development of the epidemic at the time.These two articles are published in the two internationally renowned academic journals, New England Medical Magazine and Liuye Dao.This approach of scientists has aroused controversy: Should scientists post academic articles?Should I send it in the country or internationally?Should scientists publish academic articles, or should they only fight against the epidemic?(Global Times April 23)
At the beginning of the new crown pneumonia's epidemic, these scientists were concerned about this emergency. From the social role of scientists, they gave corresponding research as soon as possible.Responsibilities.Especially within the first time, many countries around the world have not fully understood this, let alone pay attention to it, and the role of the dissertation at this time is at least a reminder to countries around the world.From this perspective, scientists send academic papers to participate in the epidemic in the epidemic in their own specific roles.
But it is not that the result of these two papers is completely correct, let alone the final conclusion, because the basis of the scientific papers explains the problem, always stand on the known conditions at this stage, and the existing known conditionsIt is a constant concept of dynamic dynamic.Just like all scientific research, the stage of time and the richness of known materials will always constitute a dynamic tranquility to a certain extent.
Scientific research, even in the face of the same topic, it is difficult for scientists in various countries to give a certain answer in the short term, because all scientists are also troubled by the time phase and the richness of materials.From this perspective, there is no difference between scientists in which country's scientists. Some are just going to observe and study. If there will be any differences in the end, it is the scientists who are willing to give up.It may be at the forefront of this subject.
On the other hand, in the large -scale scientific research process, each advanced scientist may be just the steps of the latecomers, and his research results are likely to be overturned by more new cognition and new conditions.But from a scientific perspective, this is not wrong, because the progress of any scientific research cannot be done by one person, and it needs the continuous negation or correction of the latecomers.But it is undeniable that this negation or correction itself also borrows the results of the pioneer, and the nutrients are absorbed in the negation or correction, and the scientific development is always in such progressive interaction, and the developmentThe spiral of the reciprocating cycle rises.
Should I send it in the country or internationally?Obviously, this is not a problem at all.Because the epidemic is not just a matter of China. The epidemic has no national borders. It is the common enemy of all human beings.Internationally, of course, it will produce due to a greater scope. New England Medical Magazine and willow -leaf knives are the most cutting -edge academic journals.The interaction and extension effect caused by this will greatly lead the subject to the in -depth track of the borders.
Scientific research can not avoid its subsidence at that time, but from the time of publishing the paper, you can see the materials it used at the beginning, and readers can also understand the objective vision of the author at that time.Instead of reading disabilities, on the contrary, it will be more inspired.
Therefore, looking at these two papers, no matter how short of its existence, it cannot be separated from the two objective dimensions. One is the dynamic progressive dimension of scientific research and research itself, and the other is the historical materialism dimension.At this moment, the richer materials are measured to measure the vision of the other moment.Controversy is an organic soil environment that must exist in scientific research. It is normal for controversy, but scientific affairs must be based on the laws of science itself.It is the blockade of science.
