Liu Xingzhi
Hubei writer Fang Fang wrote 60 diaries in Fengcheng, Wuhan, recorded personal insights and feelings, and published on her Weibo one after another.These diaries, in the first days of panic and chaos, like a private letter in Wuhan City, are precious, which has attracted great attention in Chinese society.What followed was to make her feel unexpectedly destroyed.
Fear of the people's opinion, such as water, can carry boats and cover the boat, but also often change.The progress of the epidemic has flipped a lot of narratives, driving the changes in public opinion, and the Fang Fang diary also experienced a public opinion roller coaster.
First, it is red and purple.At first, the Fang Fang diary used the perspective of an ordinary citizen, full of sympathy, compassion and temperature, and the anger, criticism and doubts about government work, which stirred a wide range of resonance.The narrative of heavy, depressed, and gray tones is very inconsistent with the positive energy reports of the officials and positive praise.
Because of the inconsistency, it brought people venting exports, which made the Fang Fang diary greatly sought after, and won praise from the real intellectuals of the conscience of the society.The person who is reputable is not to know the reputation, and is intended to open up the eyes and support the field to express his dissatisfaction with the government and disdain to the Gede school.During this time, the Fang Fang diary became popular in the folk public opinion field, and even represents a political correctness.As a result, criticism of diary will be regarded as defective and lack of tolerance.This also buried the foreshadowing that was fiercely arguing later.
Then, the big tear of the WeChat circle of friends (the main folk public opinion field).As the anti -epidemic work stepped on the right track, the epidemic gradually controlled, and people gradually recovered their confidence.The tragic atmosphere of resistance to the country, the lovely white warriors who aid Hubei in various provinces, the efficient construction of Vulgar Mountain and Lei Shenshan Hospital have indeed made the Chinese inspiring and moved.The epidemic was unexpectedly raging overseas, which made people see the chaotic disorder of anti -epidemic in many countries, and a little more tolerant about the early things in Wuhan.
The Fang Fang diary's gently and sad style, and the blind criticism of the government, has changed the changes in the mood of the people.Increased criticism of diary: such as hearing, inaccurate; only writing misery, not tragic, and incompleteness; sorrow, mourning, pretentiousness, insignificant, and no help to resist.There were even personal attacks.This tear, to a large extent, responds to the common scenes of liberals and the autocratic factions. The potential core issues behind them are how to evaluate the role of China's resistance and how to evaluate the role of the government and the system in resistance.
Subsequently, it was gradually turning from red.It is the self -defense psychology that Western society has accused China of shaking the pot.The Fang Fang Diary is published overseas with uncommon efficiency and is obviously used to discredit China.This incident made the critical voice exploded, and it also made her supporters feel a little short of losses and difficult to fight.
Earlier, critics predicted that the Fang Fang diary was no different from Western anti -Chinese elements to send bullets.At this point, many people said that the opponent fans turned black and even very angry.The other party's personal attacks and more and more on the Internet have also burst into some things that are difficult to distinguish between true and false. It once again shows a very bad style in folk ideological disputes.
There is no doubt that Fang Fang lost a large number of supporters, and many of them directly became critics.In their opinion, Fang Fang's diary was more like scar literature before, but now it is like a black material that intentionally or unintentionally put together the Western anti -Chinese school.From the perspective of political stance, there seems to be a context: the initial liberals, intermediates, and a considerable part of the establishment of the formulas welcomed the Fang Fang diary, and gradually became liberals, the creation factions returned to the team, and the middle school split.Outside of liberals, most people have more or less opposition.
The official attitude is also intriguing.In the epidemic, Internet management has tightened, but the other party's diary is still released.The editor -in -chief of the Global Times Hu Xijin has repeatedly speaking, advocating social tolerance and accepting similar sounds, even if there is a certain price.Perhaps, it has learned the lesson of the Li Wenliang incident, or knows that the Fang's diary has an indispensable role in soothe the psychological trauma of the masses.
In any case, the Fang Fang diary and its red and black are almost the most noticeable cultural incident in this epidemic.It commented that its value and contribution, as if evaluating the gains and losses in the government's resistance, slightly complicated.If you jump out of the dispute itself, you can also get a little inspiration from this boiling thing.
First, the people do not follow blindly and have independent judgment.This judgment is both reflected in the evaluation of the government's resistance and the response to Western public opinion. The Fang Fang diary is just a carrier expressed by the public.Most people do not preset their positions. They are willing and can objectively treat the advantages and disadvantages of the system and the gains and losses of government work.Even if the liberals and institutions are not unchanged, they will be judged based on the government as a specific matter.In the Internet era, the so -called positive publicity or negative publicity may be overestimated.More information can help strengthen the judgment of the public, not the opposite.
Second, the Chinese people are used to seeing problems from the perspective of the game, ideological struggle, and international public opinion.The government's propaganda has some impact on this, but it is more of the strong national psychological habits formed under the unique experience of modern China.This habit is also a double -edged sword.On the one hand, it can produce cohesion when the game of great powers is intensified; on the other hand, it is also easy to enlarge threats, let diplomatic overwhelming internal affairs, make unity consistent, and overwhelm rational disputes to promote reform.
Third, the foundation of the game of great powers is to do your own thing.Other people can't solve their own problems, but in order to prevent the pot from being short, they can't solve their own problems.This mentality not only has the government, but also the public.Western media has a long history of prejudice against China, and there is no shortage of themes of hype and discreditation.In order to reduce a little international saliva, tighten domestic criticism space, and reduce the government's pressure and improve the motivation, it is the end.
Fourth, the people's ideological controversy has not overcome the bad habits such as fighting sticks, buckle hats, digging people, and making rumors and discreditation.Even if only a few people are used by a few people, this kind of cultural revolution will corrupt the atmosphere. It is not conducive to rational and peaceful debates, is not conducive to improving reform consensus, and should be eliminated.
Fifth, cannot ignore intergenerational differences.The criticism of the criticism is very fierce, and there are many young people.They are not interested in politics, but they have a strong sense of national pride in the era of high -speed progress in China.The performance of the younger generation in this epidemic was moving and worthy of praise.But we must also be alert to being too confident and even proud.Don't forget that China ’s achievements today are created by older generations who have more reflection, more humble and cautious, and more willing to learn from the West.This generation does not know how to grasp and take care of geopolitics, the game of great powers, and cultural conflicts.These all require young people to learn.
The above -mentioned association seems to be a little bit out.But people who understand the disputes between Chinese folk public opinion should not feel too far from the problem.
The author is a legal adviser to Cultural Communication Company in Jilin Province, China
