Source: Hong Kong 01
Author: Oujing Luo
US President Trump was accused of suspending funding for the World Health Organization in order to punish WHO to move closer to China, causing the new type of coronary virus pneumonia to erupt in the world.
Trump stated on April 10 that he would decide the funding arrangements for WHO next week.Trump said at a press conference that the United States gave WHO $ 500 million each year and will talk about this issue next week.The outside world believes that this is the intention of the United States intentionally reduced the suspension of the WTO.
At present, the voices of the United States are particularly loud in the politics hawk. Politico reports that people who suspend funding are from the White House and the National Security Council, and many people have a tough attitude towards China.And some people proposed to establish a replacement of WTuan institutions based on the UNAIDS.
UNAIDS was established in 1996. The establishment of the background is related to the slow countermeasures of AIDS in the past and the lack of leadership ability.WHO has been criticized that since the first report of the HIV case in 1981, it was impossible to give the correct warning and unified the pace of the country, and missed the opportunity of epidemic prevention to make AIDS popular all over the world.
It is unknown what kind of organization I want to establish, but there is concerns that stopping funding for WHO today, which is concerned about the prevalence of the epidemic, will affect the prevention work of WHO in poor countries, especially the disease prevention of diseases other than the new crown virus.Actions may be opposed by countries including the United States allies and may further strengthen China's influence on WHO.
Among the currently criticized WTO's voice, the most basic thing is that he hopes that WHO can improve the police officer when the outbreak of the epidemic, and let WHO have a greater motivation to ask for more information such as China that is lacking transparency in China.In the early days of the outbreak, a greater alarm signal can be sent to the world.
In the early days of the epidemic, WHO praised China's measures for the epidemic of the new crown virus, and opposed the implementation of restrictions on entry and exit.
WHO is not an arbitration agency, and its operation is largely limited by member states.WHO has no power to ask for a specific country to do things. If Tan Desai hopes that China will join forces to resist, he must cooperate with China.
This is the same as when treating the United States. Former US President Barack Obama government crisis officials, now the Global Development Senior Policy Researcher Jeremy Konyndyk, a senior policy researcher, said that if the Criticism is not enough to ChinaTough, the WHO is not as tough as the United States.
Konodak criticized the Trump administration to ignore the danger of the epidemic and wast the time to deal with the virus, which caused a large -scale outbreak today.Konodak specifically pointed out that Tan Desai has not criticized the United States' slow response.
Politico also quoted a spokesman for a US state government to point out that from the popularity of new crown pneumonia, many lessons can be learned, including where the WHO has made a mistake in performing its mission, and it should make a comprehensive assessment after the current epidemic to avoid humans avoidedFuture crisis.
