The investigation team of the State Supervision Commission reported the conclusion of the investigation involving Dr. Li Wenliang, and determined that the Wuhan Public Security Bureau's Zhongnan Road Police Station issued improper training and irregular law enforcement procedures.The investigation team requested the urging public security organs to revoke the training of Li Wenliang and investigate the responsibilities of relevant personnel.
Just revoke the commandment, did not completely overthrow the training at the time, did not announce the arrest of several senior officials?In addition, is there no conclusion on the initial manifestation of Wuhan anti -epidemic?Some people probably feel unhappy.
First of all, according to Lao Hu's understanding, this is the investigation team involving Li Wenliang's investigation team, not the investigation team in the early stages of Wuhan and Hubei.Regarding the latter, the slow operation of Wuhan in the early days of Wuhan was a consensus on China. Lao Hu believes that the country will definitely investigate separately and strictly pursue it.In my opinion, the public deserves further expectations: at the end of the epidemic, the state will carry out a comprehensive summary, and some further accountability will not be absent.
As far as Li Wenliang is concerned, everyone has noticed that in early March, he has been rated as a national advanced person in the country by the country. This is an important signal, which is obviously related to the early work of the Supervision Commission's investigation team.Coupled with the formal revocation of the admonition of the public security department at the beginning, these two progress marks that Li Wenliang has been completely vindicated, and the state has given him the affirmation and respect he deserves.
It is worth pointing out that public opinion has played a role in promoting these changes. The high -level investigation team established a high level of response to public opinion.The investigation team eventually contributed to correction. This should be regarded as the official admission to public opinion, and seeking truth from facts is the verification of the ultimate principles of this country.There will always be errors, but to face up to face and correct mistakes in a timely manner, this is a key ability for a country and society to continue to progress.
Li Wenliang's encounter is a memory pain point for the public around this disaster. From the side, it reveals the poor response of Wuhan's early epidemic and the public's attitude towards this.Our society needs to trace a lot of incidents than this investigation team to promote the learning of lessons.However, as the investigation team of the Supervisory Commission returned Li Wenliang a fair, people can already see the country's big logic and direction of the disaster.
This investigation team has worked for a long time than the other three investigation teams, and was the last to announce the results of the investigation to the society.This reflects its most difficult work. It needs to be checked repeatedly for each fact. It must withstand the greatest focus of public opinion, and it must be able to withstand historical tests.
When Li Wenliang died of illness, there was a tsunami of public opinion. He was labeled with some labels and contained various emotions of society at that time.It was the most difficult time for China to resist immunity. The public had strong dissatisfaction with Wuhan's early response. After the country's shot, the effects of from Wuhan's sealing city to resistance from various places were unclear.The complexity of the public opinion made the Li Wenliang incident with additional significance. Which of them belonged to the Li Wenliang incident and which belonged to the peeling, they needed to be seriously identified.
Lao Hu believes that the investigation team of the Supervisory Commission is not about the various emotions and opinions of the society, and even at home and abroad. The only weapon is to focus on facts, neither stance first, nor looking forward to it.What the society really needs is this attitude, and insisting on this attitude is often the most challenging.
The facts in the public opinion field are sometimes arranged by values and desires.Through the restoration of all the situations involved in Li Wenliang, the investigation is loyal to the facts, and the public also accepts the real fact. This is a process of further maturity in the Internet era in the Internet era.
The investigation of the Li Wenliang incident has ended. Generally, it looks at Li Wenliang a fair.However, the new crown epidemic in the past 17 years after SARS has re -concluding the lessons of this country's outbreak of this country must continue, and it will be reflected through relevant accountability.Let our epidemic prevention system be stronger, sensitive and effective, and also allows the whole country to do one of them. We still have a lot of things to do. The Li Wenliang's investigation team is not an end.
