Early

Hong Kong and Macao Sudden Search

Before the opening of this article, tell a small story first.On June 8th, more than three months ago, the daughter -in -law of a real estate developer in Hong Kong held a charity organization in an important position and held a charity dinner at a five -star hotel.A friend H's boss sponsored a table, and I was invited to attend the event.

That day was just the night before the democratic school initiated the anti -amendment of the fugitive regulations, but the dinner was not affected at all, and it still attracted a large number of scholars' celebrities and star -studded.Surprisingly, Lin Zhengyue, who was the leader of the Hong Kong government, also attended the dinner. Not only did he stay for an hour, he also gave a speech.

I have forgotten the content of Lin Zhengyue's speech. In the impression, I only remember that she was talking and laughing.The next day, the development of the situation on June 9th, everyone already knows that the number of Hong Kong people with 100,000 Hong Kong people took the street on the afternoon, setting off the unprecedented large -scale demonstration opposition in Hong Kong.This turmoil lasted for nearly four months and has not seen the dawn of solution.

Later, I talked about this with experts familiar with Chinese national conditions.He lamented that in mainland China, if there was a super typhoon blowing, the local leader would not go to the front line to inspect the day before, but would have been reported to attend the remuneration banquet.Lin Zhengyue was not preparing to deal with the Chief Executive's Office on the eve of the political decisive battle. Instead, he attended the rich activities of the rich man. He also reflects the long -standing deep level of Hong Kong: the real estate developer and other chaebols in Hong Kong.

It is true that before 1997, the Chinese government promised to maintain the status quo of Hong Kong in order to transition to the transition, so that Hong Kong capitalists led by large real estate business consortiums have become the privilege class, monopolized Hong Kong industry, and the control of Hong Kong people's daily diet is almost indispensable.degree.

When the real estate -related industry has become an important income of the warehouse, the Hong Kong Government naturally has a rats to a lot of real estate developers.What's more, the Hong Kong Chief Executive Election Commission consists of 1,200 people in the four major sectors. Among them, it is the figure of large real estate developers and their related companies.The Chief Executive did not dare to rashly take this group of voters, and some policies even had to be biased towards real estate developers, so that real estate hegemony in Hong Kong has appeared.

However, while Hong Kong real estate developers have enjoyed the results of more than 20 years of prosperity, it does not seem to bear the corresponding responsibility. Especially in recent years, the prices of private houses in Hong Kong have repeatedly reached high, which has led to a deep sense of social grievances.

What makes the central government even more dissatisfied is that Hong Kong's real estate developers either do not express their statements or support demonstrators in this anti -repair campaign.It was not until the official media of the mainland to actively criticize some companies, and the silent real estate developer broke the silence and published advertisements in newspapers to condemn thugs.

However, the later consciousness of Hong Kong real estate developers has obviously irritated Beijing. In the recent period, it has begun to rub his fists. The sword refers to the real estate hegemony of Hong Kong and obviously firms the real estate developers in Hong Kong.One of the examples is that the Democratic Construction Federation of the largest part of the political parties in Hong Kong, which has close relations with Beijing, suddenly suddenly opened up the wind at high profile, requiring the SAR government to quote the recovery of the land regulations and recycle the agricultural land accumulated by real estate developers in the New Territories to build public housing.

By the middle of this month, the SAR government suddenly announced that the vacant tax publication promoted by the Conference at the end of June last year, killing developers caught off guard.According to the Sing Tao Daily, some developers were in private and anger, and rebuked the government's move to take the surgery of real estate developers. They believed that the primary goal of the authorities at this stage should be to settle the chaos first, and not to launch controversial policies at this time.

In addition, Li Jiacheng, the richest man in Hong Kong, opened a side to the young people, and immediately attracted the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China Political and Legal Committee, People's Daily and Xinhua News Agency.Real estate hegemony is the root of deep contradictions in Hong Kong.

All signs show that the Chinese government's friendly policy towards Hong Kong real estate developers is about to adjust.Beijing seems to re -dominate the control of land supply in Hong Kong in order to increase houses to relieve the people's grievances.This also echoed the reports of Reuters earlier: The central government has called on state -owned enterprises to increase their investment in the field of real estate in Hong Kong and strengthen control to try to calm the Hong Kong chaos.

In fact, after more than 20 years of development in mainland China, in recent years, it has gradually become active in the Hong Kong market and actively buying land.In the future, mainland real estate developers have further increased under the blessing of the central government, and then replaced Hong Kong -owned real estate hegemony, making Hong Kong real estate territory a large shuffle, which has almost been a foregone conclusion.

However, for nearly four months since the outbreak of the anti -repair campaign, the focus of Hong Kong society has gradually been gradually from anti -cultivation and desire to improve people's livelihood, and upgraded to demanding the so -called abuse of power and pursuing the real general election.At this time, Beijing was at an attempt to break the vested interest pattern. Will it be a bit late at the time?At present, the answer seems to be yes.