Liu Xingzhi
At the beginning of September, the Hong Kong Chief Executive Lin Zheng Yue'e announced that it had withdrawn the amendment of the fugitive regulations and launched four actions.When the situation was the most tense, it was rumored that Beijing had instructed the relevant parties to review the gains and losses of governing the Hong Kong party, and studied the policy of governance of long -term stability in the future.Now that the storm is getting quiet, the transformation of Beijing's governance strategy seems to have begun to start.
A few days ago, the Hong Kong Civil Construction Federation called on the Hong Kong Government to quote the recovery of land regulations and recover some idle land under private names for public housing construction to make up for the gap in ordinary citizens' housing.This move was awarded the Global Times Social Review and the CPC Central Committee's Political and Law Commission WeChat Changan Jian Jian Ji. The two articles directly pointed out that high housing prices are the deep reasons for the contradiction between Hong Kong society.Practice, remind real estate developers to have political and economical understanding, and use it to talk about Huangtai's melon. How can Li Jiacheng open the side of the future owner and question whether real estate developers who have hoarded land and the rich in Li will have the future of Hong Kong.Open the net?These should be a very straightforward shout for the central government.
There are similar criticism in the intellectual community in the Mainland, and even more merciless.Professor Huang Jing, a professor of Beijing Language University, focused on the serious media of China and the United States, China and the United States focusing on the issue of the internal article: The internal cause is the foundation of the 2019 summer turmoil in Hong Kong.This article rebuked the Capital Elite Governance of Hong Kong Capital Management. The control of the Capital Capital was Hong Kong's illness. It is clearly stated that the Hong Kong Government has promoted housing reforms to be blocked by real estate developers. In recent years, the opposition campaign has support behind large capital.Country and strengthening.It can be described as the argument.
After the return of Hong Kong, the Chinese government relied on large capitalists and the unreasonable establishment of the system of governing Hong Kong. This is really the situation.On the one hand, it is in line with the reality of Hong Kong, because these people have their status, strong control and high popularity in Hong Kong.After the British leave, they are the ruling class of nature.If they abandon them at the time, they must fundamentally transform Hong Kong's economy and society.Not to mention that Beijing is unintentional, and it is difficult for Hong Kong society to accept the big moves with socialist transformation.Beijing relies on them to govern Hong Kong, and it is similar to relying on the governance of noble toast in the newbound border areas.
On the other hand, Hong Kong has always been an important channel for exchanges between the mainland and the international community. In the foreign economic and political exchanges, the central government appreciates and relies on Hong Kong's capital and institutions.And they did make great contributions in supporting and integrating the development of the mainland, and of course they made a lot of money.
The central government's economic and social structural problems, such as industrial malformations, gaps between the rich and the poor, and monopoly hindering innovation, are naturally known.Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao reminded the Hong Kong government to pay attention to these problems in their early years.But Gou uses its strengths to be short, and since Beijing uses the other, it is not good to be responsible for the governor.Moreover, the central government thinks that these problems belong to Hong Kong's internal affairs, and it is inconvenient to intervene in too much. It still makes Hong Kong society slowly change.In this way, the large capitalists have been valued in the central government. They are sought after in various places that are eager to attract investment, and they are not constrained by the central government in Hong Kong. Therefore, they are also sincere in Beijing.
After that, the factors that had been close to both parties were fading, and the central government intentionally or unintentionally strengthened the governance and influence on Hong Kong society, and the gap was slowly.In recent years, the central government and mainland public opinion have been ambiguous towards the Hong Kong capitalist, and both ends of the first mouse have long been impatient.The anti -repair examples together, simply broke this window paper.The serious media of the mainland, the mass media, and some pro -Beijing media in Hong Kong have focused on Hong Kong's economic issues, especially high housing prices. It is deemed to be the crux of Hong Kong's deep contradictions.Essence
Who, who cares about, and oppose who is always the fundamental issue of real politics.The central government's strategy of governing the port has seems to have been adjusted from this fundamental issue.Do you want to cut off with Hong Kong capitalists?Should not.However, it will definitely take care of the underlying interests and correct the long vertical of the past.For the deep economic and social issues of Hong Kong, it will also re -examine from the stability of national security and the stability of Hong Kong, change the relatively restrained attitude in the past, and strongly support the Hong Kong Government to issue measures to balance the interests of the class and win the hearts of the bottom people.
Good at balanced economic interests of different levels is the traditional advantage of the Chinese ruling party.In the era of revolution and reform, the CCP attached great importance to this.After the anti -repair example, the central government's opinion will first sacrifice this trick to support the Hong Kong government to engage in a mildly and under the Hong Kong legal framework.This is necessary for the healthy development of Hong Kong, and it does not have a adverse impact on Hong Kong's freedom and the rule of law.At the same time, it was a knock on Hong Kong's large capitalists and a small punishment.
What do you think of this class of Hong Kong society?Will the underlying layer welcomes, and the middle -class will worry about the depreciation of the existing property and oppose it?The real estate developer will secretly encourage the middle producers to do things?Those who are familiar with Chinese history will know that there are very few good results of aristocratic toast against the court.It is okay to fight for one battle. It is another thing to stand on the opposite side.The Communist Party media reminds real estate developers to have political and economical understanding, not just talking.
The author is a legal adviser to Cultural Communication Company in Jilin Province, China
