Gray Middot; Allen (left), chairman of the National Committee of the US -China Trade National Committee, affirmed China's recent efforts in reform and opening up, but believed that it was not enough.(Photo by You Runtian)

Allen said that it was normal for his more than 20 years to participate in the Sino -U.S. Trade negotiations, and it was normal for a certain stage to negotiate. He did not think that this round of trade negotiations fell into a deadlock or failed.

Gray Middot, Chairman of the National Committee of the United States and China Trade; Allen believes that Sino -US trade negotiations have reached an inflection point. The Capital of China and the United States hopes and needs to reach a trade agreement. The agreement is expected to reach the end of this month.

He spoke to foreign reporters in Beijing yesterday that US President Trump and Chinese President ... Recently, the two sides agreed to attend the meeting at the G20 summit at the G20 (G20) summit at the end of this month.He believes that the two parties are expected to reach an agreement.

The negotiations between the Sino -US trade negotiation delegation did not go well last month. The United States pointed out that China has retreated from its original promised position, and China refers to that the United States has temporarily added many new requirements.Allen said that it was normal for his more than 20 years to participate in the Sino -U.S. Trade negotiations, and it was normal for a certain stage to negotiate. He did not think that this round of trade negotiations fell into a deadlock or failed.

He explained that during the negotiation process, when the two officials drafted a specific plan for individual issues, each solution could be separated, but when all the schemes of all issues were compiled into the agreement text, the leaders often felt that the specifics would feel specificThe text is different from the consensus obtained by his other leaders.

The US -China Trade National Committee is an non -governmental organization on behalf of 220 large US companies.Allen has worked in the US Department of Commerce and the State Department for more than 30 years.He said that he hopes that the trade negotiations between the two parties should not be disturbed by other issues, but should concentrate their spirit and negotiate for structural issues such as intellectual property protection, government subsidies, state -owned enterprise reforms, and industrial standards.

Allen said that the contradiction between the two countries is not limited to economic and trade, but if the economic and trade agreement can be reached, if China can truly fulfill all the promises when joining the World Trade Organization, this can create a wider and more complicated security mutual trust.Atmosphere of lack of problems.

He used the concept of international politics that China and the United States are currently in a security predicament, and both sides are highly inconsistent with each other. On the other hand, one party has taken actions to enhance their sense of security.The contradiction between the two sides has expanded from trade to science and technology, ideology, military, network security and other fields.He believes that when the two countries are in a security predicament, trade issues are easily squeezed out by other issues, so the negotiating team between the two parties must focus on economic and trade with laser -like concentration and not be deviated by other issues.

Allen made three states at the hearing of Washington the day before yesterday.The first point is that American companies fully support Trump to ask China to make structural reforms, but there is some reservations for the means of improving tariffs, because Americans are finally paid.It will weaken.

The second point is to affirm that China has recently been in reform and opening up.He said that measures such as the prohibition of compulsory technology transfer in the foreign investment law is a deposit that China and the United States have promised to pay for its commitment. Unfortunately, European and Japanese companies have benefited, but American companies have benefited from tariffs because of tariffs because of tariffs.The measures were not benefited.

The third point is that the implementation of structural reforms in China is good for both economies and workers.

In the United States, there is a point of view that reducing connection with China and trade with China and cutting moderately with Chinese technology companies in order to maintain national security.Allen disagrees, he believes that from another perspective, the economy of the two countries is more closely integrated can benefit peace and stability.