The Hong Kong Governments governance disability fails to solve the dead end depe

Ming Pao News Agency

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government suspended the amendment of the fugitive regulations. However, the crisis of governance was not lifted. The demonstrators gathered in the government headquarters, highlighting the government on all sides of the government, and the governance was invalid.In the past week, the development of the situation has changed sharply, and the citizens have a complete outbreak of the mood of the SAR government's unbelver, nor do they believe that the Legislative Council can reflect the mainstream public opinion. The problem is related to the recognition of the entire political system.EssenceThe crisis caused by the dispute over this example reflects that the current political system cannot control Hong Kong. Only a set of political systems that are compatible with Hong Kong society can govern for a long time and truly solve the crisis of governance.

Citizens lose trust in the system Non -focus on people's livelihood sugar can be packed

After the government announced the suspension of the amendment last Saturday, the social atmosphere was still quite tight. How to clean up the disabled is overwhelming.The Chief Executive Lin Zhengyue apologized for the disappointment of the process of repair. Several executives members said that the temporary suspension of the instance was basically equal to the withdrawal.The Chief Executive Office asked Lin Zheng to step down and formally withdrawn.Temporarily relieved that the instance was actually just cooling the people's conditions. The SAR government was in the most serious crisis of governance since the return, and the situation has not really changed.In order to avoid the reduction of the issue of zombies and continue to become the burden of governance in the future, the government should consider formal withdrawal of revisions.

Yesterday, Lin Zheng met with representatives such as the educational community and the religious community. According to the participants, Lin Zheng had apologized to the issue of the practice. He also talked about the results of his hope to continue to make the results in education according to the blueprint of politics.There are indeed many major people's livelihood issues in Hong Kong society that are urgently needed. Regardless of the fields of land, houses, medical care, and peace, there are still many things that the government can do and need to do.There is a clear bag, and there are not many more than any more. At present, many people's livelihood problems in Hong Kong all involve complex vested interests and political resistance. In the future, it is difficult for the government to promote controversial policies.Political mines.

In the essence of the situation, the current crisis faced by the government is severe compared to the 2003 opposition to Article 23 of the Basic Law and even the 2014 occupation movement.In 2003, 500,000 people went to the streets. In addition to the citizens 'doubts about 23 legislation, they also mixed with factors such as SARS, economic fatigue, and negative citizens' assets.The economy is enough to slowly get out of the crisis.In 2014, the occupation campaign, demonstrators demanded the true universal election. The spearheads mainly point to the Central Government 8.31 decision. All parties have always knew that the political reform plan was not enough to vote at the Legislative Council, and the opportunity was not large.Although the occupation movement has an impact on the governance of the SAR, from the perspective of the sequelae of the consciousness of the consciousness of Hong Kong, the biggest impact of the incident is obviously the relationship between Hong Kong and the Mainland.

In contrast, the crisis of trust in the SAR government and the entire political system that was detonated by the revision.Hong Kong's political system is malformed. The Chief Executive is not universal or no of the support of the party. There are many functional groups in the Legislative Council.No need to look at the overall situation.The foundation of public opinion has insufficient basis. It was originally a fatal injury of the SAR government.EssenceA large number of citizens do not believe the government's rhetoric, nor do they believe that the Legislative Council truthfully reflects the mainstream public opinion and prefers the system outside the system.Zhang Bingliang, the former director of transportation, believes that Hong Kong has no longer the same, and the people's hearts have not changed. The government faces the citizen's distrust. It is very difficult in the future, and the problem of the problem is positive.

The government's effective governance, citizens' trust in the system is extremely important. If most people no longer trust the system and choose to struggle outside the system, society will be turbulent.In 22 years of returning in Hong Kong, the social situation has been constantly changing. This crisis reflects that the current political system cannot control Hong Kong. If the right medicine is not applied, even if others replace Lin Zheng as the chief executive, it may not be possible to solve the problem. Even if the government strives to focus on people's livelihood secrets in the futureTancan is not necessarily enough to make up for structural trust deficits. In the future, as long as there is a slightly controversial issue in the future, the crisis of trust will come again at any time.

The failure of governance drags down the reconstruction of Hong Kong dual universal election

A good political system should be able to find common groundworthy differences, solve differences through a reasonable mechanism, and seek mainstream consensus. However, Hong Kong's political system continues to create problems.The government and the Legislative Council are inadequate, and the government does not have the political foundation of the political party, and it also seriously affects the authority of the authorities to judge the people's conditions.To ensure that the society is in harmony, the Hong Kong governance system is invalid, and it is actually gradually going down Hong Kong. If you want to solve the dead knot, you must jump out of the current institutional frame and establish a political system that is truly suitable for Hong Kong's social development.In the case, it is a subject that cannot be avoided.The experience of Hong Kong's past 20 years has clearly stated that it is not enough to solve the problem of recognition by relying on small repairs and small supplements to increase the democratic composition of the Chief Executive and Legislative Council.